[Lnc-business] Motion, need help with specifics

[travellingcircus at gmail.com]

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Arvin Vohra <arvin at arvinvohra.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Chairman Neale suggested this.
>
> "Staff shall be responsible for the development and maintenance of an
> Editorial Policy.  Any changes to the Editorial Policy will require the
> approval of the LNC."
>
> I think this should be done sooner rather than later, and I think it
> addresses some of the concerns with Starchild's motion as being too
> vulnerable to a Wayne Root type situation, while also giving flexibility to
> adjust quickly.
>
> Does anything need to be added before this is formally introduced as a
> motion?
>
> -Arvin
>
>
I would add something like "clearly stated" or "publicly posted" before
Editorial Policy. Not sure which term would be best but hopefully you get
my idea. There was already an editorial policy, but there was obviously
confusion over what exactly it was.

Paulie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20130105/1360f82b/attachment-0002.html>