[Lnc-business] Motions (status of secretary)

[Starchild]

	Does this mean we delay any motions until January 13? I'm not suggesting an immediate move to suspend or remove Ruth as secretary, but it does not seem appropriate to wait another entire week to get some clarity on the situation, at least not without a better explanation than we've been given (i.e. none).

Love & Liberty,
                                   ((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee


On Jan 6, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Geoffrey Neale wrote:

> I just got off the phone with Ruth – she is alive and well, so no need to be concerned with alien abduction or the like.
>  
> She has informed me that she will have a general announcement to the LNC by the end of the week, and will be working on getting up-to-date on Secretarial duties in the meantime.
>  
> Geoffrey Neale



On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Arvin Vohra wrote:

> LNC,
> 
> Based on the recent update from the Chair, I consider it appropriate to wait for the secretary's announcement at the end of the week before taking action at this time.
> 
> -Arvin
> 
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Arvin Vohra <arvin at arvinvohra.com> wrote:
> LNC,
> 
> As an appropriate courtesy, I will wait 48 hrs to either hear from the secretary, or to be given some relevant reason why suspension/resignation is not appropriate. At that time, if nothing has changed, I will formally ask for the secretary's resignation. If that yields no results or additional information in 48 hours, I will move for suspension, assuming that is possible without a secretary.
> 
> -Arvin
> 
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:56 PM, <SAM8074 at aol.com> wrote:
> Arvin, 
>  
> Please see Article 7 Section 0 of the LP Bylaws (https://www.lp.org/files/2012%20LP%20Bylaws%20and%20Convention%20Rules%20w%202012%20JC%20Rules.pdf).  Does 2/3 of the LNC have the intestinal fortitude to remove Ms. Bennett from her office for cause?
>  
> That is the only solution we have to this problem other than her stepping and doing the job for which she chose to run and to which the convention delegates elected her. 
>  
> Sam
>  
> In a message dated 1/6/2013 2:08:47 P.M. US Eastern Standard Time, arvin at arvinvohra.com writes:
> LNC,
> 
> Is it correct that without the secretary's action, we cannot do ANY mail ballots? All future motions are on hold?
> 
> If that is correct, as the Chair suggested earlier, that is so astronomically unacceptable that it's hard to know where to begin.
> 
> -Arvin
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org