[Lnc-business] Quarantine

Joshua Katz planning4liberty at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 23:53:12 EDT 2014


That position, I think, implies that the right policy decisions depend
on knowledge of the situation.  That may be, but it may also be that
forcibly quarantining people is wrong, regardless of the risk of
infection (not saying I'm sure of that, just that it's one position
that a person could take.)  So such a statement is taking a position,
at least on one question.

Maybe that's right - maybe we should forcibly quarantine people if a
real threat of an outbreak exists.  I'm not sure.

I heard a radio host tonight talking about the nurse in Maine.  He
opined that she presented no risk, but should be quarantined anyway,
because people will panic if she's not.  Regardless of the question I
ask above, this kind of thing seems clearly wrong - you lose your
rights because, if you didn't, other people might be stupid.
Joshua A. Katz
Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)


On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Marc Allan Feldman <marc at openivo.com> wrote:
> Philosopher and historian William Durant once said "Nothing is often a
> good thing to do, and always a clever thing to say."
> When there is something on the horizon, many people very early cry "We
> have to do something!"  as if doing something that makes the situation
> worse is preferable to waiting for more information to make a wise
> decision.
> Rahm Emanuel said "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And
> what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you'd think you
> could not do before."
> I suppose I would like a statement like:
> "We do not have enough information yet to determine the best policy
> decisions.  Everything we know so far is that although there is a
> great deal of fear, the actual risk is vanishingly small.  The
> important thing to do in this situation is to take reasonable
> precautions while gathering information, and resist efforts of those
> who would use a crisis to take advantage of the fear to grab power and
> infringe on our freedoms in ways they could not do before."
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Joshua Katz <joshua.katz at lp.org> wrote:
>> I am struggling as to the libertarian/Libertarian response to this
>> issue.  Libertarians have been giving answers all over the map, and
>> some have been more permissive of government action on this than, for
>> instance, Obama.  Others have given 'absolutely not' answers - but I
>> don't know that the right answer is "your right to go to the movies
>> trumps us not wanting an epidemic."
>>
>> Now, I think the panic about Ebola is based largely on
>> misunderstandings - some deliberate, some not - of its potential for
>> contagion, mode of transmission, and so on.  But that's also no answer
>> to the principle question.  What if a disease really was as contagious
>> as people think Ebola is?  What would be the answer then?
>>
>> I'm bringing this up here because it's one of the most stark questions
>> about freedom in society at the moment.  I think the LNC should hammer
>> out some position, and that this position should guide staff in
>> interviews, publications, etc.  I don't know what that position should
>> be.
>>
>> Joshua A. Katz
>>
>> Region 8 (Region of Badassdom) Alternate
>> Libertarian National Committee
>>
>> Chair, Libertarian Party of Connecticut
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
> --
> Marc Allan Feldman
> CEO
> OpenIVO, Inc.
> Beachwood, OH
> marc at openivo.com
> http://about.me/marcallanfeldman
> 216-312-4169 (direct)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org




More information about the Lnc-business mailing list