[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2014-06: International Representatives

[Daniel Wiener]

I vote yes on Email Ballot 2014-06: International Representatives.

Daniel Wiener
Region 4 Representative


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:

> We have another electronic mail ballot.
>
> *Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by July 13, 2014 at 11:59:59pm
> Pacific time.*
>
> *Sponsor:*  Nick Sarwark
>
> *Motion:*   Amend the Policy Manual to add the following as a new Section
> 2.09.3 (and renumber as needed):
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> 3)  International Representatives
>
> The LNC may appoint one or more individuals to serve as International
> Representatives, subject to the following:
>
>    - The title is honorary, and does not convey any binding authority,
>    unless specifically and conditionally delegated by the LNC.
>    - The International Representative serves at will, and may be
>    terminated by either party at will without cause.
>    - The terms of service are from appointment until termination, and
>    will not be tied to LNC terms of office.
>    - Expenditures for this position must be made from either budgeted
>    expenses or from restricted funds raised specifically for this purpose.
>    - The purpose of this position is to establish and maintain mutually
>    beneficial relationships between the LP and its international counterparts.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> And, appoint Geoffrey Neale to serve as International Representative.
>
>
> Alicia Mattson
> LNC Secretary
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>


-- 
*"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
-- Richard Feynman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20140704/a318c60d/attachment-0002.html>