[Lnc-business] Informal Poll LNC December Meeting
Scott L.
scott73 at earthlink.net
Fri Aug 1 17:00:18 EDT 2014
Madame Secretary:
I request that you deduct two points from Mr. Katz's point total because he
used the phrase "point of unitary elasticity"
in an e-mail to this list.
I have a minor in economics, and I still had to look that phrase up on the
Internet to refresh my memory as to what it meant.
Scott Lieberman
_____
From: Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of
Joshua Katz
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 12:34 PM
To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Informal Poll LNC December Meeting
I take no position on whether we use a contractor or not. I also, as a side
note, would love to see New Orleans - it's been on my list for quite some
time. When I moved to Texas, I in fact got off at New Orleans to see the
city, but my schedule didn't permit an overnight stay. Neither did my
budget, which is the concern I raise today. The hotel we are considering
for this convention will cost us about $5000 to hold an LNC meeting there.
I am assuming that this is with the knowledge that we are considering them
as a venue for a major convention, hence a really good deal (respective to
the hotel.) I understand that the average cost of an LNC meeting is in the
neighborhood of $2500. I am only guess, then, that this will be a quite
expensive convention. Floor fee or no, the more expensive the venue, the
less we are likely to net profit/greater net loss, unless either:
1. We have states who have more willing delegates than spots (not too many)
and an expensive venue will keep the poorer delegates away, thus increasing
sales of larger packages. I would object to this on moral grounds if I
thought it, in fact, were the case, but I don't.
2. We charge more for packages that are substantially the same. Of course,
for instance, banquet tickets will cost more at a costlier location (I'd
expect) since food costs will be higher - and of course we don't know where
the point of unitary elasticity is, although I strongly suspect (see 1
above) that this point doesn't move when the convention is held at a fancier
location.
Given the cost of this venue for an LNC meeting, I therefore lean towards it
not being a great venue for a convention, and would support having the
meeting at the Hampton Inn instead. I would add that, while it's a good
idea in any case, we really need to minimize costs for the next couple LNC
meetings since we are, in a sense, bankrupt. So even if using the Hampton
Inn will increase costs in the future, I think it makes sense at this
particular moment to defer some costs into the future - time preference,
etc.
Joshua A. Katz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20140801/cd15cd55/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list