[Lnc-business] draft minutes of 9/20/14 LNC meeting

[Alicia Mattson]

A message from the Knights who 'til recently said, "Ni":

Now YOU'RE talking about it, Dan.  Oh!  When I'm pointing out that you're
talking about it, it makes me talk about it.  I talked about it again!  I
keep talking about it!   Aaaaaah!

-Alicia



On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Daniel Wiener <wiener at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> Will you all please shut up about the secret budget?  You know we're not
> even supposed to mention its existence except in our secretly-held secret
> sessions.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There's a secret budget for the pickle-flavored chapstick that's in my
>> pile of potential gifts?  I spent that 50 cents from my own pocket!  :-)
>>
>> -Alicia
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:34 PM, <SAM8074 at aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  I think we need to debate the points openly and freely.  If points are
>>> going to lead to party funded suites for LNC members with champagne buckets
>>> and fois gras, then we must at least add a line item in the secret budget.
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>>  In a message dated 10/3/2014 2:56:58 P.M. US Eastern Daylight Time,
>>> wiener at alum.mit.edu writes:
>>>
>>>  Alicia,
>>>
>>> I trust you are maintaining a detailed spreadsheet of points awarded and
>>> deducted?  Do we need to add a Policy Manual provision regarding points?
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Evan gets one half of a point for amusing the Secretary by noting
>>>> Bill's name correction.
>>>>
>>>> I also awarded Dan Wiener a point for his having noticed during the
>>>> Alexandria meeting that my motion to amend the policy manual without
>>>> previous notice required something other than a simple majority vote.
>>>>
>>>> -Alicia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Evan McMahon <indyliberty at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I found a mistake. Bill Redpath is NOT refered to by his preferred
>>>>> name... Cherry Bomb.
>>>>>
>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>
>>>>> Evan McMahon
>>>>> At-Large Representative
>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>
>>>>> evan.mcmahon at lp.org
>>>>>  On Sep 27, 2014 2:53 AM, "Alicia Mattson" <agmattson at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>    Attached are the first draft minutes from the Sept 20-21 LNC
>>>>>> meeting in Alexandria.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please note that comments from the LNC on the minutes are due by
>>>>>> October 11.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alicia Mattson
>>>>>> LNC Secretary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
>>> guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
>>> compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
>>> this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
>>> the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
>>> experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
>>> disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
>>> to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
>>> doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
>>> If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
>>> -- Richard Feynman
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
> guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
> compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
> this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
> the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
> experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
> disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
> to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
> doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
> If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
> -- Richard Feynman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20141003/214db0ed/attachment-0002.html>