[Lnc-business] Spring LNC mtg: San Diego, Houston, Atlanta, Alexandria

[Joshua Katz]

Why not both?  That provides a good reason to go twice.  Why not have every
meeting there?  Have I mentioned I like LV?

I agree with my regional rep in thinking that we don't need to send staff
to FF.  If we want a presence there, I'm sure volunteers would be willing
to staff a booth.  It would cost us less to pay entry fees for a few
volunteers than to send staff - but I would expect, in any case, that
buying a booth gets you free passes for the volunteers anyway.  If Nevada
doesn't have sufficient volunteers (unlikely) I'd bet that there are
activists in other states willing to travel at their own expense to staff a
booth.

It shouldn't be hard to train volunteers to man a booth properly - most do
it often in their affiliates.

Joshua A. Katz
Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Rich Tomasso <rtomasso at lpnh.org> wrote:

> Dr Lieberman wrote:
> > I suggest that this weekend we first decide if we want to hold an
> > LNC Session in Las Vegas the day after Freedom Fest.
>
> If you are talking about an LNC meeting in Vegas, better to coordinate it
> with the LSLA meeting than FreedomFest. I think Brett even floated that
> option. Plus, Vegas in July??
>
>
> Norm Olsen wrote:
> > Meeting after Freedom Fest has advantages and disadvantages.
> > 1>Staff is often there already and saves costs.
>
> Are we sending staff to FreedomFest? If so, why? I've been asking for
> years for the return on FF, other than when Gary Johnson had a presence
> there, and have yet to hear anything to justify the expense. We have a very
> active affiliate in NV who could take on the staffing of a booth.
>
>
> ~Rich
>  Region 8 Rep
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20141209/b532c759/attachment-0002.html>