[Lnc-business] request co-sponsors to approve 6/26/14 minutes

[Vicki Kirkland]

I will co-sponsor.
Vicki Kirkland


On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Daniel Wiener <wiener at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> I'll co-sponsor it.
>
> Daniel Wiener
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am now requesting co-sponsors for an email ballot to approve the
>> attached minutes from the 6/26/14 pre-convention LNC meeting.  The only
>> difference between this document and the previous one I distributed is that
>> the status on page 1 has changed from "draft" to "candidate for approval".
>>
>> Alicia Mattson
>> LNC Secretary
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
> guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
> compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
> this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
> the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
> experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
> disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
> to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
> doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
> If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
> -- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20150127/cc31e066/attachment-0002.html>