[Lnc-business] Recent LP Facebook post - Our Continued Social Media Blunders

[Vicki Kirkland]

>
>
>
> Dan:
>

    I agree with what you are saying.

    Vicki Kirkland
     Region 2 Rep LNC


------------------------------

>
>
> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Daniel Wiener
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 01, 2015 2:42 PM
> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Recent LP Facebook post - Our Continued
> Social Media Blunders
>
>
>
> Following up on Nick's comment, I have been tracking the number of
> "shares" of this meme since yesterday (see attached graph).  The question
> in my mind was whether it was better from a public relations perspective to
> just let the matter die out, or to entirely remove the image resulting in a
> "content unavailable" Facebook error for those who had already shared it.
> If I saw that the controversy was continuing at a high level or even
> accelerating ("going viral") then I would absolutely recommend removing the
> image as the least bad course of action.  However, as the graph shows, the
> average number of "shares" (which are no longer coming from the LP's
> Facebook timeline) has rapidly dwindled over the past day from an average
> of 45 an hour to an average of just 3 an hour.  So unless something
> suddenly changes, I'm inclined to let it die off naturally rather than risk
> re-igniting the controversy by pulling the image.
>
>
>
> Dan Wiener
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20150302/2d18bbe0/attachment-0002.html>