[Lnc-business] requesting email blast for LPEX

[Daniel Wiener]

That email blast went out this morning.

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Since the LNC adopted a motion to become a sponsor of LPEX, I think it's
> perfectly appropriate for us to send an email blast to our list to make
> sure our members know of the opportunity to attend.
>
> If we're going to sponsor it, why not take one extra easy step to help it
> be a bigger success?
>
> As Brett Pojunis indicated on the state chairs' email list, the deadline
> is approaching for booking hotel rooms in the block, so sending a message
> sooner will be more effective than sending one later.
>
> What is the sense of the rest of the LNC?
>
> -Alicia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>


-- 
*"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
-- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20150423/4a73afb8/attachment-0002.html>