[Lnc-business] King v. Burwell v. Obergefell v. Hodges

Scott L. scott73 at earthlink.net
Sat Jun 27 11:16:46 EDT 2015


 

I am not going to argue with that showstopper, but Counselor - at least get
your facts correct:

 

 

 

http://www.sltrib.com/home/2668885-155/story.html

 

"Before Friday, gay and lesbian couples already could marry in 36 states -
including Utah - and the District of Columbia. With the ruling, the
remaining 14 states, in the South and Midwest, will have to stop enforcing
their bans on same-sex marriage."

 

In other words - Obergefell v. Hodges did not change the law in "all 50
states." 

It only "changed the law" in the remaining 14 states.


   Scott Lieberman

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of
Nicholas Sarwark
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 6:54 AM
To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] King v. Burwell v. Obergefell v. Hodges

 

One of those decisions maintained the status quo ante regarding health
insurance subsidies and one of those decisions was a landmark case
recognizing individual rights that changed the law in all 50 states.

   Nick

 

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

 

 

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Scott L. <scott73 at earthlink.net> wrote:

Fellow LNC members:

 

As of right now, 5am Pacific Time on Saturday, June 27 there are 2 articles,
and 2 memes, 

regarding the "Gay Marriage" Supreme Court "verdict" on the LP's Facebook
page.

There is nothing wrong with that, even though it is less than 24 hours after
that "verdict" was released.

However - it has been almost 48 hours since the Supreme Court's "verdict" in
the King v. Burwell case was released, and there are 0 articles and 0 memes
regarding that "verdict" on the LP's Facebook page.

Considering that the best estimates are that only 3% of the US population is
gay, whereas something like 99% of the population will need health care at
some time in their lives, is there any rational reason for this discrepancy
in the number of items on the LP's Facebook page regarding these two
"verdicts"?

We know that as of yesterday afternoon the Facebook team had at least 3
memes for King v. Burwell ready to go.

   Scott Lieberman

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20150627/6311e702/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list