[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2015-09: Increase Branding Budget

Wes Benedict wes.benedict at lp.org
Sun Oct 4 22:40:31 EDT 2015


We are not throwing stuff away. Hardly any for practical purposes. I've re-ordered the old style shirts twice since the new logo was adopted. I've even reordered old style stationery in small quantities while we finalize the new stationery. Shirts hats stickers brochures we sell for more than we pay for most of it. 

See my email about selling $25 polo shirts for $50. And for those I got the sales before ordering stock. 

> On Oct 4, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Roland Riemers <riemers at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> In regards to the new Logo,  I think the big discussion at the LNC meeting was which one and the cost of buying the rights for it, and was it really worth $5,000.  I may be wrong, but I do not recall $20,000 for rebranding everything.  I think the idea presented was to use up what we have and go to the new as we order new supplies.  But, where did I leave me notes?????
> Roland of ND
> 
> From: Joshua Katz <planning4liberty at gmail.com>
> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org 
> Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 1:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2015-09: Increase Branding Budget
> 
> I'm not voting yet, but it seems to me that we, in some sense, took on this responsibility when we decided to change our logo.  We can't logically adopt a logo and not update our materials, nor can we ask those materials to magically update themselves.
> 
> The remaining question, then, is whether we should do it now, or first run out of materials and then do it.  Either way, we'll be paying.  A related question is - can we buy new materials and not throw away what we have on hand, and live with the fact that not everything will be perfectly branded?
> 
> In my mind, I see a rather strong argument that it is penny-wise, pound-foolish to not maintain consistent branding, and so I find this rather unobjectionable, given what we've already decided to do.  
> 
> Joshua Katz
> 
> Joshua A. Katz
> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
> 
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> We have an electronic mail ballot.
>  
> Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by October 14, 2015 at 11:59:59pm Pacific time.
>  
> Sponsor:  Sarwark
>  
> Motion:  to amend the budget by increasing line 26 Branding/Political Materials Revenue by $15,000 from $20,200 to $35,200 and by increasing line 55 Branding/Political Materials Expense by $15,000 from $20,000 to $35,000
> 
> Alicia Mattson
> LNC Secretary
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20151004/49428462/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list