[Lnc-business] petitions
Roland Riemers
riemers at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 27 09:28:35 EST 2016
Wes, in regards to the petitions, it would appear that we already have a good handle on validating, and I do not believe we should spend a huge amount of effort doing the states work for them. But, one area I would have for caution, is to insure there are no mass fraudulent signatures put in by paid petitioners. Although they have already been reviewed for that here, I would suggest any petitioner who was not well known to us, and who collected more then a few pages, be given a cautious look at to insure honesty. I would not have much concern or waste time on petitioners with an established good record with us. Another red flag might be a petitioner who when given a quick verification on some of his petitions, came up with an unusually high or an unusually low verification rate. I would think that if we spent a day on such a review, and it turned up nothing suspicious, that the state is not likely to find any fraud either.
Well, me and Paul are off again to hassle the voters. Have a good day, and see you in February.
Roland Riemers ND
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160127/7ac5802e/attachment.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list