[Lnc-business] confusion on LPKY motions
Alicia Mattson
agmattson at gmail.com
Sun Sep 25 14:52:35 EDT 2016
Caryn's re-co-sponsorship is sufficient to get the count to 4 on LPKY
motions A and B. Email ballot coming shortly.
-Alicia
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com
> wrote:
> Ahh I was confused.
>
> I re-affirm my co-sponsorship of A and B.
>
> .
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There are three motions about two different LPKY lawsuits that have been
>> floated for email ballots. I got them confused, and perhaps my confusion
>> dragged two others down with me.
>>
>> Let's see if I can clear this up.
>>
>> The three motions are summarized as:
>>
>> A) $500 to cover costs in ballot access lawsuit
>>
>> B) $2,000 to appeal ballot access lawsuit to SCOTUS
>>
>> C) $7,000 to cover costs in lawsuit against KET over debate criteria
>>
>> Motions A and B were initially co-sponsored by Katz, Harlos, Redpath,
>> Bittner, Hayes.
>>
>> Katz indicated he was willing to move C (since Moellman as an alternate
>> can't do it). After I posted a minutes excerpt from Sept 2014 indicating
>> the LNC had previously approved $6,500 of the $7,000 being requested in
>> motion C, Katz withdrew from C.
>>
>> After Katz withdrew sponsorship of C, both Bittner and Harlos said they
>> would withdraw also...but they had only co-sponsored A and B, not C, so the
>> only thing they could withdraw from was A and B.
>>
>> If Bittner and Harlos are withdrawing from A and B, then those motions
>> only have 3 co-sponsors and would need a 4th to become an email ballot.
>>
>> If, however, they also got the subjects crossed, perhaps they would like
>> to re-affirm their co-sponsorship of A and B?
>>
>> Sorry for starting the confusion... Have I got it right now?
>>
>> -Alicia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160925/06304d3d/attachment.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list