[Lnc-business] clarifying wording of LPKY motions

[Alicia Mattson]

There are two LPKY motions which have received a sufficient number of
co-sponsors to become email ballots.

As I was working these up to send out, I noticed a detail in the motion
wording that we should perhaps fix.  The revised wording by Joshua when it
was split into two separate motions refer to it as a "ballot access case".
As I recall, this is not a lawsuit over ballot access.  It's over candidate
debate criteria at a publicly funded television station (KET) which is
required by law to set objective criteria, but instead they kept tweaking
the criteria for the express purpose of keeping the LP candidate excluded.

Joshua, was that phrase perhaps written out of habit (so many of our
lawsuits are about ballot access) when you really meant to keep Ken's
original terminology that it is the "KET case"?

While we get clarification of the intended wording, I'll locate the minutes
from our original actions on this subject.

-Alicia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160924/bcd54aa0/attachment-0001.html>