[Lnc-business] website motion

Tue Feb 16 20:31:44 EST 2016

Thanks for that response, Mr. Katz.  I hope other members of the body weigh
in here.

While we're on the topic, it is my understanding that the IT Committee was
given a budget of $25,000 at the very first IT committee meeting.  They had
one main goal: fix the website.

We are now close to two years in and still have nothing to show for it.

I wanted to point that out because unless I'm incorrect about that number,
we don't even have to rearrange the budget to do it.  We just have spend
what was allocated to make it happen.

I am happy to use NationBuilder BTW.  It would be even cheaper at this
point.  I can easily outsource the design of the website based on specific
criteria.  I can get us back visual comps.  We can pick one.  They can beef
it up.  NationBuilder can implement it.  For $25,000 I would expect that
possibly almost overnight!  ...not really, but in the "Good, fast, cheap -
pick two" world, $25,000 gets you a hell of a lot of GOOD and FAST when
you're just need to design the site and not develop it.

Kevin Ludlow
Region 7
512-773-3968

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Joshua Katz <planning4liberty at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'll address Mr. Ludlow's open question, in the course of doing so, I
> think I will address some of Mr. Riemer's points.
>
> As I said before, I don't know if our website is good or bad, and if it's
> bad, I don't know why.  That doesn't matter, though, since I am not in
> either of the two groups that would be reliable on this question:  web
> developers and the target market.  Mr. Ludlow is in one of those groups, so
> I believe him on that.
>
> I don't need to know what, precisely, is wrong with our website.  No one
> elected me here because of my capacity for being impressed by websites.  I
> do notice a few things - our home page is covered in text, while
> Democrats.org is not, for instance.  I also happen to know that companies
> don't just come up with websites that say what they want to say.  They
> think carefully about who their messaging is targeting, and then pay people
> to come up with sites that will speak to those people.  Do we have a solid
> sense of our target market?  If not, I am not sure a web developer can
> design something to do what we want.  I think we do, though, and I think we
> could communicate our needs to a web developer, who knows how to make a
> page accomplish the things we want to accomplish.
>
> I have no idea what makes one page appeal to one group and a different
> page to another.  I see that the home page of Democrats.org displays very
> brief "I'm a Democrat because..." statements, and asks users why they are
> Democrats (getting customers to tell you how to sell to them seems useful).
>
>
> That seems a pretty apt reason why this board shouldn't be asking
> questions like "what's wrong with it?  what would you have it do instead?"
>  If a programmer comes to Microsoft's board and wants funding to update
> some program, the board doesn't try to second-guess that programmer, using
> whatever coding skills they picked up at a weekend class at their local
> public library.  They believe the programmer, then decide if the
> expenditure to do the update fits into their strategic plans.  They
> certainly don't say "we're not going to fund that, but I went to a
> programming forum and found this bit of code...stick that into your program
> instead and see if that works."  Instead, I'd suggest we do what we were
> elected to do, and not things we weren't elected to do.
>
> Why do it now and not next budget year?  Well, that depends.  If we
> believe that a better website would generate more votes, better candidates,
> and more elected officials, what's the point of waiting?  If we have some
> reason that more members, more donors, and more elected officials now would
> be a bad thing, then yes, I agree, we shouldn't improve our largest
> marketing presence now.  If not, then I don't see why we'd agree it needs
> to be done, then wait.
>
> Will I support this proposal?  Most likely, but I'll want to know first
> what's going on with the IT committee, which took on this project.  I don't
> want bids coming in for two different overhauls, and I want to know where
> they are in the process.  Certainly, the length of time we've been talking
> about this is much longer than Mr. Ludlow tells us the entire project
> usually takes, so I'm also curious why it isn't done already (and why we,
> the LNC, don't give our committees more power to act on our behalf, rather
> than making reports at quarterly meetings on which the LNC may or may not
> act).
>
> So that's where I stand on this; pending seeing the actual motion and
> hearing the IT committee report.
>
> Joshua Katz
>
>
>
> Joshua A. Katz
> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Kevin Ludlow <ludlow at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All:
>>
>> As I mentioned last week when adding to the agenda, I intend to pursue
>> $20,000 from the budget and the blessing to spend that money on a 3rd party
>> website development company for lp.org.  I have several highly qualified
>> companies that I work with.  I've no intention of pursuing my own software
>> company as a vendor.
>>
>> I will formalize the motion before Saturday.
>>
>> I was hoping to get an idea on who would be willing to support this
>> motion.  I would note that this has been talked about for 2 years.  The
>> website is horrible.  I am professionally qualified to lead this effort.  I
>> am highly confident we can have the whole thing done in 6 weeks time (from
>> whenever we get going).
>>
>> If there is a discussion to be had, please start that discussion here so
>> we needn't waste time on the floor answering questions that could easily be
>> answered on via email.
>>
>> I really hope this group is interested in pursuing this.  Please consider
>> that we spend over twice as much annually sending printed pieces of paper
>> as I am requesting for a the one-time development cost of what should be
>> our single most valuable tool for marketing, branding, and general outreach.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> Kevin Ludlow
>> Region 7 Rep
>>
>>
>> --
>> ========================================================
>> Kevin Ludlow
>> 512-773-3968
>> http://www.kevinludlow.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>

-- 
========================================================
Kevin Ludlow
512-773-3968
http://www.kevinludlow.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160216/f01ce649/attachment-0002.html>