[Lnc-business] website motion

[Daniel Wiener]

Roland, I just saw that the arrival time for my flight has *advanced* to
12:52 pm from 1:05 pm.  That makes it more marginal, for me to wait an
extra quarter hour.  Of course who knows what additional delays may occur.
So let's just say that the situation is fluid.  I'll talk to you Friday.

Dan Wiener

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Wiener <wiener at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> Roland, my Southwest flight is scheduled to arrive at 1:05 pm (MST).
> Unless I hear a better offer, I'd be interested in sharing a shuttle with
> you and anyone else, since it will still probably be faster than public
> transportation.  My cell phone number is 805-587-2647.
>
> Dan Wiener
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Roland Riemers <riemers at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Yah,  we have a new web site in ND this year.  Has a zippy button to join
>> or make donations.   Has a zippy button to push for Pay Pal,  or another
>> one for a credit card.  I prefer using a credit card.  But,  hit the credit
>> card button and you end back into Pay Pal.  ERRRG.   So, no donation to the
>> party from me.  So much for fancy new web sites.  Of course, me and
>> computers have never gotten along anyway.
>>
>> But enough about web sites.  For those going to Arizona tomorrow, my
>> Delta flight was delayed and now gets in at 1:43 p.m. if anyone is
>> interested in sharing AAA shuttle call me at 701-317-1803.
>>
>> Roland Riemers ND,  Reg. 6
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
> guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
> compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
> this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
> the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
> experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
> disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
> to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
> doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
> If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
> -- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
>



-- 
*"In general, we look for a new law by the following process. First, we
guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we
compute the consequences of the guess, to see what, if this is right, if
this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply and then we compare
the computation results to nature or we say compare to experiment or
experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works. If it
disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key
to science. It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it
doesn’t matter how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is.
If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. That’s all there is to it.”*
-- Richard Feynman (https://tinyurl.com/lozjjps)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160218/cfe9adbd/attachment-0002.html>