[Lnc-business] Fwd: Request for Motion to Censure

[David Demarest]

Good grief, don’t we have better things to do during this election year. Without examining the merits of this motion, I can’t think of a better way to shoot ourselves in the foot! The sensible time and place to consider this motion is after the election when calm, cool and collected wisdom can be brought to bear on this issue.

 

Celebrate Life, Set the Bar High and LIVE FREE!

 

The War on Cronyism Begins Now!

 

~David Pratt Demarest

Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee

Secretary, Nebraska Libertarian State Central Committee

David.Demarest at LP.org <mailto:David.Demarest at LP.org>  

Secretary at LPNE.org <mailto:Secretary at LPNE.org> 

DPDemarest at centurylink.net <mailto:DPDemarest at centurylink.net>  

David.Demarest at firstdata.com <mailto:David.Demarest at firstdata.com> 

http://www.LP.org  

http://www.LPNE.org

Cell:       402-981-6469

Home: 402-493-0873

Office: 402-222-7207

 

From: Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of Arvin Vohra
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:29 AM
To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
Subject: [Lnc-business] Fwd: Request for Motion to Censure

 

LNC,

 

A request has been made from Guy McLendon, a former LNC member and current LP member to put forth this motion to censure. In my role as a member of the LNC, I am forwarding this motion to be considered by mail ballot. I believe that it requires 3 additional cosponsors to go to a mail ballot. If you wish to cosponsor this motion for it to be considered by mail ballot, please indicate that to this list. The motion and supporting information follows:

 

*********************************************

 

Please motion on my behalf:  “Based upon evidence provided in the case ‘McLendon vs Hayes & Adams’, motion to censure Hayes for alleged blackmail, fraud and violations of the Libertarian principle of non-aggression, and to censure Adams for alleged violations of the Libertarian principle of non-aggression.”  Please forward this message to the LNC in its entirety with six attachments.

 

Blackmail definition:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=blackmail

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blackmail

 

Fraud definition:

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/fraud

 

When a LP member believes a credible risk is present that could threaten the integrity of our organization, and even the integrity of some aspects of our conventions, that member has a duty to blow the proverbial whistle.  It’s my hope that you, the LNC & our members don’t condemn this messenger for requesting a motion to censure.

 

Please consider these general questions about our organization when reviewing this material:

*         What's the value in having the pledge of non-aggression if we lack an internal judicial system capable of handling gross violations of the NAP against our own members?

*         Is the public court system the only recourse to LP internal victims?

 

There are features of our recent 2016 National Convention that I perceive as very troublesome, but at this time I have insufficient hard evidence upon which to issue a formal complaint.  However, in convention planning meetings & teleconferences bullying tactics such as elevated voice levels have the potential to improperly influence decision making processes.  Corroborating information is available upon request.

 

Please protect the integrity of the LNC, and our national conventions.

 

Respectfully yours in liberty,

Guy McLendon

Chairman Calcasieu Parish Louisiana





 

-- 

Arvin Vohra

www.VoteVohra.com <http://www.VoteVohra.com> 
VoteVohra at gmail.com <mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com> 
(301) 320-3634

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160616/55e8fe4c/attachment-0002.html>