[Lnc-business] Committee transparency

[Daniel Hayes]

It's transparent that this is planned and coordinated and planned effort.  Was this concocted in some hidden defunct AOL private room from the early 90s at a cost of $3.95/hr? Or was this done in Jekyll Isle, Georgia?


Daniel Hayes
LNC At Large Member

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 14, 2016, at 3:07 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Charles, thank you for writing.  As your Regional Representative I am absolutely committed to transparency and will keep my campaign promise to fight for it.  I urge my fellow Regional Representatives to be in touch with grass roots Party members.  I am, and do not find that they support opacity.  I also support the limited exceptions you do, which is already in place.  I will keep Region 1 updated as to the status of my efforts, and thus far, no one in Region 1 has supported opacity.
> 
> cc: LNC Business List
> 
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Hi Charles,
>> 
>>         Thank you for taking time to write and to be engaged as a member with the governance of our party. Such engagement is vital to maintaining the Libertarian Party as a grassroots, bottom-up organization.
>> 
>>         My view is that secrecy should be used very rarely by our party's leadership, and that if a matter is important enough that it needs to be kept secret, it is important enough that it should be considered by the entire LNC and not just a subcommittee. But I appreciate your generally pro-transparency stance, and it seems quite possible that something like what you suggest may be the compromise we end up with (hopefully with appropriate safeguards to prevent the abuse of "exceptions").
>> 
>>         Thanks again for writing, and for your work for freedom as an activist and candidate for public office. Good luck with your race this November!
>> 
>> Love & Liberty,
>>                                  ((( starchild )))
>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>>                               (415) 625-FREE
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 13, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Charles Schaefer wrote:
>> 
>> > To the members of the LNC,
>> >
>> > I am writing to request than any committees empowered to make decisions on your behalf be subject to the same standards of transparency as the LNC currently is. I understand exceptions may be necessary for personnel matters, ballot access discussions, and other sensitive issues, but those should be the exception and not the rule.
>> >
>> > Charles Schaefer
>> > Washington State Representative Candidate (Libertarian)
>> > 33rd Legislative District, Position 1
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160814/ee3b6f7c/attachment-0002.html>