[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2016-03: Gun Rights Resolution

Sean O'Toole sean at kingfieldcapital.com
Sun Aug 14 20:26:30 EDT 2016


Good work David! Thanks for working on Iowa. Missouri is covered as we 
consistently exceed the minimum vote counts to remain a recognized party 
here. Minnesota shouldn't be a problem. Traditionally, Minnesotans are 
willing to sign even when they disagree with us. The total signatures 
needed used to get collected over a few weeks with volunteers at a few 
well attended festivals.

Interstate communications and state to LNC do seem to be lacking. The 
only time we Missourians seem to look outside the state is when we are 
looking to put together multi-state conventions every few years. I'd 
like to see that change but my peers here in Missouri are pretty busy 
with the 40+ campaigns we have this year.

_________________________
Sean O'Toole
sean at kingfieldcapital.com
(816) 739-2737

On 14 Aug 2016, at 18:59, David Demarest wrote:

> Thanks, Sean. I have voted Aye this motion and will vote Aye on 
> Starchild’s amendment to the motion on but I appreciate your vote 
> too!
>
>
>
> Any issues with ballot access in Missouri? My wife and I just 
> collected about 50 signatures for Iowa this afternoon and will go out 
> again tomorrow if necessary before the Iowa deadline Friday. Still 
> have not heard back from Minnesota. I have never gotten a response 
> from Wisconsin but I think I heard they are okay. Since I found out 
> about these Region 6 ballot access issues only by accident, I jacked 
> up the ballot access committee to keep the regional reps and 
> alternates informed on ballot access issues in their regions. In 
> general, it appears to me that we need more robust communication 
> channels at all levels of the LNC.
>
>
>
> Celebrate Life, Set the Bar High and LIVE FREE!
>
>
>
> ~David Pratt Demarest
>
> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (IA, IL, MN, 
> MO, NE, ND, WI)
>
> Secretary at LPNE.org <mailto:Secretary at LPNE.org>
>
> David.Demarest at LP.org <mailto:David.Demarest at LP.org>
>
> DPDemarest at centurylink.net <mailto:DPDemarest at centurylink.net>
>
> David.Demarest at firstdata.com <mailto:David.Demarest at firstdata.com>
>
> Cell:      402-981-6469
>
> Home: 402-493-0873
>
> Office: 402-222-7207
>
>
>
> From: Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf 
> Of Sean O'Toole
> Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 4:03 PM
> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2016-03: Gun Rights 
> Resolution
>
>
>
> I believe that Mr. Demerest has already cast his vote. But in the 
> event that he has not and does not, I vote "yes".
>
>   _____
>
> Sean O'Toole
> sean at kingfieldcapital.com <mailto:sean at kingfieldcapital.com>
> (816) 739-2737
>
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 22:40, Alicia Mattson wrote:
>
> We have an electronic mail ballot.
>
> Votes are due to the LNC-Business list by August 22, 2016 at 
> 11:59:59pm
> Pacific time.
> Co-Sponsors: Harlos, Katz, Hayes, Goldstein, Vohra
>
> Motion:
>
> WHEREAS, Libertarians affirm that self-defense is an inherent human 
> right;
>
> WHEREAS, the Platform of the Libertarian Party opposes all laws at any
> level of government restricting, registering, or monitoring the 
> ownership,
> manufacture, or transfer of firearms or ammunition;
>
> WHEREAS, the Platform of the Libertarian Party affirms the right of 
> due
> process and deny the legitimacy of “victimless crimes”;
>
> WHEREAS, the government has steadily encroached upon these rights by
> illegitimately regulating and restricting access for firearms and
> ammunition and may further seek to deprive people who have been 
> convicted
> of no crime of their inherent right to full self-defense by denying 
> their
> civil and inherent rights to obtain firearms and ammunition;
>
> BE IT RESOLVED that the Libertarian National Committee opposes any 
> policy
> which would deny access to any firearms or ammunition to any person 
> simply
> for being placed on any government watch or no-fly list and reaffirms 
> its
> call to repeal and oppose any existing or proposed firearm and 
> ammunition
> regulations.
>
> -Alicia
>
>   _____
>
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org <mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160814/2393c159/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list