[Lnc-business] September meeting, prior to asking for co-requestors

[Ken Moellman]

Just checking to make sure that this electronic meeting wouldn't trigger
the following from the policy manual. I don't think it does, but I want
to be sure we have adequate time to create the ballot access committee
report. 

"With the assistance of staff, and prior to the second general LNC
meeting following the completion of the bi-annual election cycle ending
in November of even numbered years, prepare and present a report" 

---
Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
LPKY Judicial Committee 

On 2016-08-18 18:44, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote: 

> Thank you Joshua. We can start batting around some dates if we get enough support. Or if the Chair calls a meeting. A member asked me privately how much time I was talking about and I said 4-6 hours total (I anticipate there will be other agenda items that people would want, and perhaps inviting Nielson to give a campaign update would be in order). 
> 
> -- 
> 
> IN LIBERTY, 
> CARYN ANN HARLOS 
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org 
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado [1] 
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus [2] 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Joshua Katz <planning4liberty at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree with meeting electronically in September. I'm not sure about handling goals at such a meeting, but I do think we should meet. My availability is questionable, though, but I'll say this: I can't tell you "I'm available at such and such times" but I will make every effort to attend, whenever it is scheduled. 
> 
> Joshua A. Katz 
> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat) 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> I firmly believe we need a September electronic meeting. I would like people to give availibility. Seems to me this is something that can and should be discussed publicly without off-list private discussions. 
> 
> Business? Primarily the goals that were not done the last meeting. And any other outstanding issues, for myself that would be the transparency proposal.
> 
> -- 
> 
> IN LIBERTY, 
> CARYN ANN HARLOS 
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org 
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado [3] 
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus [4] 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [5]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [5]

 -- 

IN LIBERTY, 
CARYN ANN HARLOS 
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) -
Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org 
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado [3] 
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus [4] 

_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org [5] 

Links:
------
[1] http://www.lpcolorado.org/
[2] http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/
[3] http://www.lpcolorado.org
[4] http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org
[5] http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160818/d106c9cd/attachment-0002.html>