[Lnc-business] [Lnc-votes] Meeting Request

[Starchild]

	My commitment for Sunday the 25th goes into the evening time you're proposing, but is this the case for the members who mentioned Saturday commitments? They may have been assuming an all-day type online meeting, and perhaps are free Saturday evening at the proposed time.

Love & Liberty,
                                  ((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                               (415) 625-FREE


On Sep 6, 2016, at 5:36 PM, Joshua Katz wrote:

> My memory, apparently, is faulty.  Two members had stated they had commitments every Saturday, and I forgot about that.  My understanding is that Starchild could not do that Sunday.  How about the 18th?
> 
> Joshua A. Katz
> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
> 
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Joshua Katz <planning4liberty at gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, I meant videoconference.
> 
> Joshua A. Katz
> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
> 
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 	I'll co-request this. From 5-7pm on the 24th should work for me.
> 
> Love & Liberty,
>                                    ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>                                 (415) 625-FREE
> 
> 
> On Sep 6, 2016, at 4:38 PM, lnc-votes at hq.lp.org wrote:
> 
>> I am seeking co-requesters for a teleconference meeting to be held Saturday, September 24, 2016, at 5PM Pacific - 7PM Pacific.  I am happy to adjust date and time if needed; I'm basing this off my memory and Caryn's assistance.
>> 
>> The agenda items would be as follows:
>> Amend Something Previously Adopted - Budget
>> Populating Committees
>> Transparency for Committees
>> 
>> The items would be in that order, and there would be, I hope, a 2 hour hard stop.  (According to some recent research, a 72 minute hard stop would be better, but that's not realistic.)  
>> 
>> It is my belief that these items, particularly the budget item, can be dealt with fairly easily at such a meeting if we do the spadework here, and might possibly be questions that come out differently at such a meeting vs. email.  In other words, I think they would profit from real-time discussion and deliberation.  
>> 
>> Joshua A. Katz
>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lncvotes" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lncvotes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160906/a395b770/attachment-0002.html>