[Lnc-business] Developing a regular process for funding Libertarian candidates and campaigns
Caryn Ann Harlos
carynannharlos at gmail.com
Sat Sep 24 18:34:05 EDT 2016
I'm on my phone and cannot type much but I'm sure Daniel will chime in on
the ASC. I have been very pleased with the way he has Chaired this
committee.
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
On Saturday, September 24, 2016, Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net> wrote:
> What is the exact status of how we are doing things with regard to the
> Affiliate Support Committee, i.e. which decisions they are making that do
> not get referred to the LNC? I believe we adopted a policy, but I don't
> recall how specific it was without going back and looking it up. Speaking
> of fishes, I wish the committee page on LP.org ( http://www.lp.org/bylaws-
> mandated-committees ) included descriptions of what the committees do and
> how they function – not only for the sake of transparency, but so we on the
> LNC ourselves can keep track. It amazes and dismays me that a simple thing
> like this still hasn't gotten fixed since I was on the LNC before
> (2012-2014). Is there anyone who actually opposes adding this information?
> Links to committee reports and minutes? Contact information for the
> committees? Email lists to join on read-only basis?
>
> I don't want to rely only on those LNC members who care enough about
> accountability to keep committees from going awry. The Libertarian National
> Campaign Committee remains a cautionary example of how this has not worked.
> Years after its former chair Wayne Allyn Root went back to the Republican
> Party to support politicians like Mitt Romney and Donald Trump, its
> website, while no longer looking like his personal vanity project, could
> still pass for that of a conservative organization –
> http://www.lncc.org/about/ is all focused on the economic side of the
> libertarian agenda, nothing about civil liberties.
>
> I want to empower our members to be able to monitor and get involved with
> committees, so that they can be our eyes and ears and bring pressure to
> bear when things need fixing. Not to mention that allowing more people to
> participate will help ensure that committees are functioning as committees,
> and not just a committee chair acting unilaterally. How many of our
> committees are actually holding regular meetings, discussing stuff as
> committees, keeping minutes, keeping the LNC informed of their actions?
>
> Love & Liberty,
> ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> (415) 625-FREE
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2016, at 6:14 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> Ken and Starchild, if we had a willingness to meet more often
> (electronically) and be much more nimble, I would love to see more direct
> LNC involvement. But holy cow, we just don't. If Affilate Support had to
> wait for us to decide, things would not happen. If wishes were fishes we'd
> all cast nets. Having a minimum number of LNC members on the committee
> would satisfy me, and having overall guidance such as Joshua suggested.
>
> But this would also require an LNC with the fortitude to take back and
> control a committee that was going awry.
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>
> On Friday, September 23, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ken.moellman at lpky.org');>> wrote:
>
>>
>> I believe this should remain a power of the full committee. A Candidate
>> Support Committee can certainly do important tasks, such as providing tips
>> to campaigns and vetting candidates. They could then present the top
>> candidates to the full LNC.
>>
>> I am not a fan of giving any subcommittee a budget without full LNC
>> oversight. And while I might someday regret that standpoint, I do think
>> that if a committee-vetted project isn't good enough to sell to the full
>> LNC then it's probably not a good project.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>
>>
>> On 2016-09-23 23:44, Starchild wrote:
>>
>> In general, I think subcommittees should report back to the LNC, with
>> ultimate power being retained by the committee of the whole. Getting away
>> from that model means putting power into the hands of smaller groups of
>> insiders and to some extent disenfranchising the representatives elected
>> directly by party delegates.
>>
>> In some cases, late-breaking developments or unforeseen circumstances
>> might justify providing funds to a campaign that had not submitted a timely
>> request for funding. In some cases, LNC members will be well informed on
>> the details of races, perhaps better informed than members of the
>> subcommittee.
>>
>> Once a process for applying for funding is established, I think the
>> natural tendency will be for the LNC to look skeptically on requests coming
>> outside that process, and to rely heavily on it's subcommittee's
>> recommendations for dispersing funds. But cutting the LNC out of the
>> decision-making loop would be a bad idea.
>>
>> Like Caryn, I would expect there to be rules mandating transparency for a
>> process such as I've described, and agree that should come first.
>>
>> Love & Liberty,
>> ((( starchild )))
>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>> (415) 625-FREE
>>
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2016, at 8:27 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>
>> And I largely agree with Joshua. We have spoken on this quite a bit.
>> And of course, I would never vote to approve such a Committee without
>> transparency. The whole motivation behind my recent transparency motion is
>> to get to a place where we can craft THIS committee for candidate support.
>>
>>
>> --
>> *In Liberty,*
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Joshua Katz <planning4liberty at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree that a process is needed if we're going to do this, and I
>>> largely agree with your suggested format. I have a few suggestions.
>>> First, I would like to appoint the committee with power. We should strive
>>> to appoint a committee that is well-informed and knowledgable on the topic,
>>> and let them decide how to parse out the money we budgeted. We can't
>>> expect the LNC to be informed on the details of these races, and I'm not
>>> sure what is added by us listening to people who know more about the
>>> question, but then acting on the recommendation instead of letting them do
>>> it.
>>>
>>> At the same time, I'd like the LNC to give broad strategic direction to
>>> the committee. We can tell them our major goals for this process, and
>>> where funding candidates fits into the bigger picture, and expect them to
>>> act in accordance with those broad ideas.
>>>
>>> That strategic direction should also, in my view, direct the choice of
>>> questions for that questionaire. I'm not going to go through and note
>>> every point of disagreement with the suggested questions because, first, I
>>> realize they are only examples, and second, I think figuring out sorts of
>>> questions there should be without a more explicit statement of what we're
>>> trying to achieve is putting the cart before the horse.
>>>
>>> Joshua A. Katz
>>> Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I continue to feel inadequately informed to vote on these various
>>>> requests for funding, and feel that we ought to try to develop a fair,
>>>> equitable, and predictable process for the LNC to handle funding requests
>>>> from state affiliates, LP candidates, and so on.
>>>>
>>>> One aspect of this that occurs to me is that while things like lawsuits
>>>> and outreach events can happen unpredictably throughout the year, most
>>>> general elections happen in November. For that campaign cycle, at least, I
>>>> think a promising method for making funding decisions might be to establish
>>>> two or three pre-announced funding periods during which times any LP
>>>> candidates interested in obtaining funding from the LNC would be invited to
>>>> submit their requests. For instance, we might hypothetically designate the
>>>> 2nd week in June (after primaries are generally over), the 1st week in
>>>> August, and the last week in September as periods for applying.
>>>>
>>>> For each of these periods, we could budget a total amount of funds to
>>>> be distributed, based on our current resources, and announce the
>>>> availability of these funds, along with the requirements and deadlines to
>>>> apply for a portion of them. Appoint a committee to review all the
>>>> applications received and make recommendations to the full LNC on how to
>>>> divide up the pile of funds available for that distribution period among
>>>> the various campaigns that applied. Lay out a clear timetable – say a week
>>>> for the committee to make its recommendations, and another week for the LNC
>>>> (to whom the applications would also be made available as they are
>>>> submitted) to meet electronically or in person, debate and vote on any
>>>> amendments to the committee's recommended disbursements, and get checks
>>>> sent out – so that campaigns would know when to expect the requested funds,
>>>> if any.
>>>>
>>>> To apply for funding, campaigns could be asked to fill out a standard
>>>> form (available on LP.org and perhaps printed in LP News) providing
>>>> information such as name, office sought (partisan or non-partisan),
>>>> campaign website, and responses to a number of questions such as:
>>>>
>>>> • How much money are you requesting?
>>>> • How would you plan to spend these funds (be specific)?
>>>> • How useful would it be to your campaign if you are only granted a
>>>> portion of the funding you request?
>>>> • Where do you fall on the Nolan Chart (submit filled-out quiz with
>>>> application)?
>>>> • What are your three top campaign issues?
>>>> • What campaign promises have you made?
>>>> • How much press has your candidacy received (include links/clippings)?
>>>> • Has there been any polling in your race, and if so, what were the
>>>> poll results (sources/numbers/dates)?
>>>> • How much money have you raised so far, and on what has it been spent?
>>>> • What are the legal restrictions on how much you can raise and spend?
>>>> • Who are your opponents and how much have they raised and spent?
>>>> • Besides trying to get you elected, what is your campaign doing to
>>>> build the Libertarian Party and advance the cause of freedom?
>>>> • Please list at least one reference other than a family member who can
>>>> vouch for you and your campaign and confirm as much of the information
>>>> you've provided here as possible.
>>>> • Will you provide to the LNC within 30 days of the election a report
>>>> on how your campaign went, and how the money granted to you by the party
>>>> was spent (being specific)?
>>>>
>>>> Some of the above questions clearly relate to candidates and would not
>>>> be relevant to ballot measure campaigns seeking to defeat or enact a
>>>> particular proposal. For those types of campaigns, there might be other
>>>> questions not applicable to candidates, such as:
>>>>
>>>> • Please provide the text of the measure in question (can be a web link)
>>>> • Please provide a list of the groups and prominent individuals
>>>> supporting the measure in question, and a list of the groups and prominent
>>>> individuals opposing it
>>>> • What is your assessment of the impact that passing this measure would
>>>> have?
>>>>
>>>> I would propose that campaigns not be deemed automatically ineligible
>>>> for funding as a result of failing to provide any particular requested
>>>> information, but obviously the LNC and the members of its appointed
>>>> subcommittee would be likely to take the completeness of information
>>>> provided into consideration when making their decisions.
>>>>
>>>> What do other LNC members think of this as a general approach for
>>>> general election campaign/candidate funding? Any suggested modifications or
>>>> additions?
>>>>
>>>> Love & Liberty,
>>>> ((( starchild )))
>>>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>>>> (415) 625-FREE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 23, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Hayes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The initial request was for $12,000 for a television campaign and now
>>>> has been lowered to $5000. I don't understand how either amount of money
>>>> on television can have any demonstrable effect on an election. While this
>>>> opponent may have poor name recognition the Democrat Party has an extreme
>>>> hold on the vote process in Massachusetts. How much money has Mr. Simmon's
>>>> raised for his campaign so far? This is always one of the considerations I
>>>> use when considering a donation to a candidate.
>>>> Also, as Whitney has stated, Mr. Simmons says he needs the entire
>>>> $12,000 from National. That isn't legal. There are ways around things but
>>>> that all takes extra time. Even if members cosponsored this it would still
>>>> be at least a day before it even started being voted on and then would take
>>>> up to 10 days after that. This motion doesn't meet the amount he says he
>>>> MUST have from the LNC and doesn't meet his time frame. I wish luck to Mr.
>>>> Simmons in his campaign but I don't think we can help him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Hayes
>>>> LNC At Large Member
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>>>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just bringing up the immediate practical concerns. It takes day to get
>>>> co-sponsors, if they can be gotten and ten days for an email vote which
>>>> already puts this past any week deadline.
>>>>
>>>> We need a Candidate Support Committee badly.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Patrick McKnight <
>>>> patrick.joseph.mcknight at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am seeking cosponsors of my amended motion to allocate $5,000 in
>>>>> support a TV ad for Thom Simmons. Thom is running for Congress in western
>>>>> Massachusetts. http://simmons4congress.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> I am forwarding the attached storyboard for Thom Simmons' proposed ad.
>>>>>
>>>>> From Thom regarding the storyboard:
>>>>>
>>>>> "They are looking at three different ads that would cover western
>>>>> massachusetts (Berkshire region), which, incidentally, would also spill
>>>>> over into NY and VT - which could only help with Alex Merced's Senate race
>>>>> and the J/W campaign in Vermont as I do not shy away from the Libertarian
>>>>> label. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The first and third require some explanation, as they are unique: they
>>>>> are REVERSE attack ads, meaning: at first, they start out dark as if they
>>>>> are an attack ad against me, with the voice over saying something such as,
>>>>> "he wants to end common core.." The idea is to get people to say to
>>>>> themselves, "yeah, me too!" and then end by showing people they agree with
>>>>> me and the LP after they have already said this on their own heads.
>>>>>
>>>>> The second ad plays on the print media, which has called my opponent
>>>>> "disappearing," "missing" etc, by showing him and then fading out. It is
>>>>> the single biggest factor in this campaign, as the Berkshires - dems, reps,
>>>>> Inds...are LIVID at his inattention to that portion of the district.
>>>>>
>>>>> This could be a gamechanger.
>>>>>
>>>>> I realize that everyone wants money - and I will be blunt: if we are
>>>>> to do this, I need $12,000 for the full campaign from National. And I need
>>>>> to know within a week to get into production.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would appreciate it if you could bring this to the attention of the
>>>>> powers that be in the LP, and see we can get them to invest in my
>>>>> campaign. The Mass State Cmte is fully aware of, and supports this
>>>>> request."
>>>>>
>>>>> "We're talking five weeks of three ads. There is no realistic way to
>>>>> know what percentage of the electorate will see them, except that the only
>>>>> TV in western Mass is Cable and they are working through the Cable system,
>>>>> so ANYONE watching TV will see them. Of course you can see the ad, I can
>>>>> not produce the ad without knowing I have the funds to do so! The
>>>>> Storyboards give a general idea...we cant expect scripts or more polished
>>>>> ads if we cant guarantee to pay the studio.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most important, there will NOT be a "sea" of political ads: NO ONE is
>>>>> spending TV time in Massachusetts, as there are NO OTHER CONTESTED RACES in
>>>>> western Mass! The Presidential campaigns are not even spending money in
>>>>> Mass."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your consideration of this matter,
>>>>> Patrick McKnight
>>>>> Region 8 Rep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Thomas Simmons <simmons4congress at gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:59 AM
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Simmons rough storyboard concepts
>>>>> To: patrick.mcknight at lp.org, Larry.Sharpe at lp.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick and Larry,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am forwarding the very rough storyboard mockups from
>>>>> WeThinkAdvertising in Schenectady, NY, with whom I met last week for a
>>>>> possible TV Ad campaign.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are looking at three different ads that would cover western
>>>>> massachusetts (Berkshire region), which, incidentally, would also spill
>>>>> over into NY and VT - which could only help with Alex Merced's Senate race
>>>>> and the J/W campaign in Vermont as I do not shy away from the Libertarian
>>>>> label. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The first and third require some explanation, as they are unique: they
>>>>> are REVERSE attack ads, meaning: at first, they start out dark as if they
>>>>> are an attack ad against me, with the voice over saying something such as,
>>>>> "he wants to end common core.." The idea is to get people to say to
>>>>> themselves, "yeah, me too!" and then end by showing people they agree with
>>>>> me and the LP after they have already said this on their own heads.
>>>>>
>>>>> The second ad plays on the print media, which has called my opponent
>>>>> "disappearing," "missing" etc, by showing him and then fading out. It is
>>>>> the single biggest factor in this campaign, as the Berkshires - dems, reps,
>>>>> Inds...are LIVID at his inattention to that portion of the district.
>>>>>
>>>>> This could be a gamechanger.
>>>>>
>>>>> I realize that everyone wants money - and I will be blunt: if we are
>>>>> to do this, I need $12,000 for the full campaign from National. And I need
>>>>> to know within a week to get into production.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would appreciate it if you could bring this to the attention of the
>>>>> powers that be in the LP, and see we can get them to invest in my
>>>>> campaign. The Mass State Cmte is fully aware of, and supports this request.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for anything you can do for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thom Simmons
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Theresa Smolen <tsmediaconsulting at gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:24 PM
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Simmons rough storyboard concepts
>>>>> To: simmons4congress at gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Thom, (We have another Simmons we have dealt with in the past - I
>>>>> apologize for my last email with Scott in the greeting!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are three commercial concepts.
>>>>> They are very rough at this point. We will need more/better photos of
>>>>> you if you have more, so we can put together nicer storyboards for you to
>>>>> present.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let us know what you think!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Theresa
>>>>>
>>>>> Theresa Smolen
>>>>> Project Manager
>>>>> We Think Advertising
>>>>> 426 State Street, 3rd Floor
>>>>> Schenectady, NY 12305
>>>>> 518.810.8760 cell
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain We Think
>>>>> Advertising proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or
>>>>> subject to copyright belonging to We Think Advertising. This E-mail is
>>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
>>>>> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are
>>>>> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action
>>>>> taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is
>>>>> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail
>>>>> in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the
>>>>> original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>
>>>>> *From: *Christopher O'Reilly <coreilly at wethinkauto.com>
>>>>> *Subject: **simmons*
>>>>> *Date: *September 9, 2016 at 1:12:28 PM EDT
>>>>> *To: *Theresa Smolen <tsmediaconsulting at gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher J O'Reilly
>>>>> President
>>>>> We Think Auto
>>>>>
>>>>> (518) 281-5540
>>>>> coreilly at wethinkauto.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> www.wethinkauto.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Website: Simmons4Congress.com
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>> Harlos at LP.org
>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *In Liberty,*
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20160924/d74e9df7/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list