[Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for co-sponsors
Caryn Ann Harlos
carynannharlos at gmail.com
Fri Oct 21 23:22:22 EDT 2016
And I would distinguish greatly a state candidate from our national
candidate which was ratified and consented to by delegates at a national
convention. A state candidate is ratified by those delegates (in most
states and in normal circumstances which do not involve a mid-term Party
affiliation switch). In such a case I give great deference to the
affiliate that welcomed and championed. And once again, Nevada has made
their absolute displeasure and sense of betrayal clear.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I find what if's and mining the subjunctives to be unhelpful personally.
> I do not know what kind of transgression would warrant in a "what if"
> situation. I would say yes, we should always be willing. Our duty is not
> to any elected person but to the Party itself and the principles for which
> we stand. This is a clear egregious violation which is somewhat like what
> some say about "pornography" - I know it when I see it. I would ask if
> someone commits to be a Libertarian and acts completely against Libertarian
> principles and received money from the National Committee of said Party is
> that committing fraud against the body? If the constituents feel
> defrauded (particularly since they elected a Republican, not a Libertarian)
> then it is up to them to deal with, not us. Our standing and duty is to
> the LP and the members.
>
> This isn't a minor issue. This was major with a capital M. And Nevada
> has made clear how they feel about it.
>
> The minute was have the "uncensurable" we are doomed. We are the "Party
> of Principle" and we need to have the backbone to at some point say enough
> is enough, particularly when we spent $10K of our members' money.
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm glad that the dilemma is understood. And you did bring up the other
>> question I had, after further consideration; would we, as a body, be
>> willing to censure an elected Libertarian President Johnson? If this is
>> the case, how bad would the transgression need to be before this body
>> rebukes its own first elected President?
>>
>> We really need to help give our candidates and elected officials, to the
>> limited extent that they exist, be successful champions for liberty. And by
>> "we", I mean every person who says they're a libertarian. If we can't go
>> out and help convince other people's minds, then we're failing as activists
>> and supporters. IMO, the root problem here is that 60% number. Why do 60%
>> of the people in Moore's district support this?
>>
>> As I further discussed this with a few others this afternoon and evening,
>> I had another thought. If someone is elected to represent the people of
>> his district and fails to do so, would that person be engaging in fraud
>> against the constituents?
>>
>> Every candidate and elected official has negatives. I personally prefer
>> to focus on a candidate's positives, rather than dwelling on their
>> negatives. If the negatives exceed the positives, then I start looking for
>> an alternate course of action.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2016-10-21 16:05, Demarest, David P. wrote:
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your honest and thoughtful devil's advocate response
>> regarding the proposed censure of John Moore. We can, however, view
>> Assemblyman Moore's two egregious votes as an golden opportunity for LNC
>> members to think outside the box to examine root causes and design short
>> and long term solutions to the difficult dilemma faced by all Libertarian
>> politicians. The dilemma is how to reconcile the dictates of one's
>> Libertarian conscience with the realities of our current political
>> environment that is rife with the cronyism necessary to get elected or
>> reelected. The choice is between voting your conscience at the risk of not
>> being reelected or violating your conscience to get reelected and live to
>> fight another day in office.
>>
>>
>>
>> I would submit that Moore's violation of his conscience to get reelected
>> makes him part of the problem of spiraling cronyism that is inexorably
>> destroying our way of life and accelerating our economy and society down
>> the path of destruction that history demonstrates is the inevitable fate of
>> all compulsory territorial governments. Most of us support Gary Johnson in
>> spite of specific misgivings because it is obvious that Gary is so much
>> better than the other choices and would undoubtedly make things far better
>> than the other candidates. If Johnson is elected, however, we know that
>> despite his honestly about his platform, many of his decisions will give us
>> heartburn. Our short-term act of censuring Moore will send a clear and
>> unambiguous message that statist actions by Libertarian officials to save
>> political seats are unacceptable violations of conscience that will not be
>> tolerated. The proposed censure of Moore will serve as an educational
>> message for all present and future Libertarian officials including those
>> who switch from other parties.
>>
>>
>>
>> Long-term solutions require that we understand that cronyism does not
>> fare well in the competitive context of the free-market. By contrast,
>> cronyism is aggressively fostered in our current compulsory authoritarian
>> majority rule system. We as Libertarians face an uphill battle if we choose
>> to rely solely on a top-down legislative authoritarian approach to rescue
>> us from the tsunami of cronyism that will swamp our ship of state if we do
>> not reverse course promptly and with a sense of urgency.
>>
>>
>>
>> The crushing curse of cronyism will not be reversed until we change the
>> context of government to minimize instead of fostering cronyism. To get
>> straight to the point, that change in context to discourage cronyism will
>> not occur until we achieve competitive governance and competitive social
>> services. I would further submit that we must supplement our top-down
>> legislative strategy with a robust, bottom-up entrepreneurial peaceful
>> freedom revolution fueled by peer-to-peer technology. Then and only then
>> will we create the political climate necessary to elect Libertarian
>> officials to all levels of government and establish the environment of
>> competitive governance and social services that is an absolute prerequisite
>> if we seriously intend to minimize cronyism and save our way of life for
>> future generations.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> *The War on Majority Rule Authoritarian Cronyism Begins Now*
>>
>>
>>
>> ~David Pratt Demarest
>>
>> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (IA, IL, MN, MO,
>> ND, NE, WI)
>>
>> Secretary Pro Tem, LNC Affiliate Support Committee
>>
>> Secretary, Nebraska Libertarian State Central Committee
>>
>> Nebraska State Coordinator, LP Radical Caucus
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Caryn Ann Harlos [mailto:carynannharlos at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 12:50 PM
>> *To:* ken.moellman at lpky.org; lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> *Cc:* William Redpath; Demarest, David P.
>> *Subject:* Re: Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for co-sponsors
>>
>>
>>
>> We have enough cosponsors for a ballot. I will argue for it in the
>> ballot.
>>
>>
>>
>> It was an LPNV who last broached this action
>>
>> with me - I believe it has the support of the aggrieved affiliate - and
>> members- who's money we spent.
>>
>>
>>
>> The second vote was expressly against something the LPNV was opposed to
>> actively for years.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a betrayal of the LPNV. And I certainly did not vote (and I
>> argued zealously) to support a candidate - out of many worthy candidates -
>> who would take such crony capitalist anti/libertarian power.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 21, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Please allow me to take the Devil's Advocate position, since I probably
>> won't have a vote that counts anyway. I realize that this position is
>> unlikely to be popular.
>>
>>
>>
>> Politics and philosophy can be a tough balancing act. Certainly, there
>> are instances of this problem with our presidential ticket (bake the cake,
>> for example) and probably every other campaign out there (vaccination
>> debate, etc.). Elected officials, and indeed individuals, are faced with
>> tough decisions between philosophy and reality all the time. Perhaps the
>> most famous was Jefferson's opposition to slavery while also owning slaves.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Assemblyman Moore reported that a poll of the constituents of his
>> district showed that about 60% of the constituents supported the deal,
>> including the associated taxes. Certainly, there could and should have been
>> a coordinated effort by the opposition to stop this deal by educating the
>> public. Based on the level of support reported within Assemblyman Moore's
>> district, those efforts were obviously unsuccessful.
>>
>>
>>
>> Even taking what was said above into account, I personally
>> think Assemblyman Moore's greatest failing in this situation came was in
>> how he supported the deal. A statement about "While I personally do not
>> support this deal, I voted in favor because my constituents wanted me to do
>> so" could have been a very good moment. It would have provided an
>> opportunity to educate the public about the negatives of the deal and
>> hopefully prevent this type of situation from happening the next time.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> So I ask these questions: Do you think that what John Moore did was
>> driven by philosophy, or by politics? Do you believe that John Moore
>> wanted higher taxes? As an elected representative, should he represent the
>> people of his district, or ignore those people in favor of his own
>> philosophy? Is it more wise to go against the constituency, especially
>> this close to election day, or is it more wise to fight another day when
>> your "army" is more organized and can help you win the day?
>>
>>
>>
>> Just something to think about. I'm not pleased at the idea of yet
>> another billionaire getting a taxpayer-funded stadium and I don't believe
>> they create enough economic activity to offset the costs. At least the
>> team name is appropriate.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2016-10-21 09:27, William Redpath wrote:
>>
>> I will also co-sponsor, as I was opposed to the $10,000 motion at the LNC
>> meeting in July 2016. Bill Redpath
>> --------------------------------------------
>> On Thu, 10/20/16, David Demarest <dpdemarest at centurylink.net> wrote:
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for
>> co-sponsors
>> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> Cc: david.demarest at firstdata.com
>> Date: Thursday, October 20, 2016, 9:20 PM
>>
>> #yiv9175739729
>> #yiv9175739729 --
>>
>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15
>> 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {font-family:Verdana;panose-1:2 11
>> 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
>> #yiv9175739729
>> #yiv9175739729 p.yiv9175739729MsoNormal, #yiv9175739729
>> li.yiv9175739729MsoNormal, #yiv9175739729
>> div.yiv9175739729MsoNormal
>> {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
>> #yiv9175739729 a:link, #yiv9175739729
>> span.yiv9175739729MsoHyperlink
>> {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
>> #yiv9175739729 a:visited, #yiv9175739729
>> span.yiv9175739729MsoHyperlinkFollowed
>> {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
>> #yiv9175739729 p.yiv9175739729msonormal0, #yiv9175739729
>> li.yiv9175739729msonormal0, #yiv9175739729
>> div.yiv9175739729msonormal0
>> {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}
>> #yiv9175739729
>> span.yiv9175739729gmail-m-7066241125321024756gmail-m6375615
>> 45514884297m-7093137337385855135gmail-s1
>> {}
>> #yiv9175739729 span.yiv9175739729gmail-im
>> {}
>> #yiv9175739729 span.yiv9175739729EmailStyle20
>> {color:windowtext;}
>> #yiv9175739729 .yiv9175739729MsoChpDefault
>> {}
>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
>> #yiv9175739729 div.yiv9175739729WordSection1
>> {}
>> #yiv9175739729 Caryn, I will co-sponsor your
>> motion to censure John Moore and request that he return the
>> $10,000 campaign contribution from the LNC. Mr. Moore's
>> two votes were egregious. Thoughts? Celebrate Life, Set the Bar High
>> and LIVE FREE! The Invisible Hand of
>> Self-Interest is Mightier Than the Sword of
>> Government! ~David Pratt Demaresthttp://www.lpne.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpne.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=ZPO-4J67vwV6ByD7vb8knOZpRMrndul0DsYJwqVwT_0&e=>
>> secretary at lpne.orgdpdemarest@centurylink.net
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__centurylink.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=37Lwyhxfp0qUBXRvtP01RB9aT0NWx-ASCm0rjSNqLTk&e=>
>> david.demarest at firstdata.com
>> Cell: 402-981-6469Home: 402-493-0873Office: 402-222-7207 From:
>> Lnc-business
>> [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Sent: Thursday,
>> October 20, 2016 7:45 PM
>> To:
>> lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> Subject:
>> [Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for
>> co-sponsors
>> Multiple
>> party members including region 1 members have acted that the
>> LNC take action regarding Assemblyman Moore. While normally,
>> I would say that is solely an issue for the state party to
>> handle, unless possibly, a Federal candidate, but in this
>> case, we spent National Party member's direct monies,
>> and thus I do agree this is our responsibility. As someone
>> who advocated for the funds allocation, I believe it is my
>> responsibility to address this once members raised a
>> concern:
>> Whereas Nevada Assemblyman John
>> Moore, a former Republican who in January 2016 switched to
>> the Libertarian Party while in office, has during the past
>> month voted not once but twice in the span of as many days
>> to raise taxes on his constituents, including a vote to
>> support a "More Cops" tax which the Libertarian
>> Party of Nevada has tirelessly and thus far successfully
>> opposed, and a vote to provide a $750 million subsidy to
>> finance a billionaire-owned sports stadium at the expense
>> of, among others, indigent persons renting weekly rooms in
>> motels; and Whereas the elected leaders of our
>> state affiliate party in Nevada have rightfully voted to
>> censure Assemblyman Moore for these egregious votes;
>> and Whereas we wish to convey a strong
>> message to all and sundry that while we welcome sitting
>> legislators in the Republican or Democrat parties who
>> decide to switch to the Libertarian Party as an act of
>> conscience, we do not welcome them if they
>> intend, as members of our party, to continue voting and
>> acting like Republicans or Democrats; Therefore be it resolved that the
>> Libertarian National Committee hereby censures Assemblyman
>> Moore for his recent votes in support of tax increases,
>> requests that he return the $10,000 campaign contribution
>> which the LNC this season voted to send him, and admonishes
>> him to henceforward be a better champion of the values held
>> by members of the political party with which he has chosen
>> to affiliate if he intends to remain a
>> Libertarian.
>> --
>> In
>> Liberty,Caryn Ann
>> HarlosRegion 1 Representative,
>> Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado,
>> Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.orgCommunications Director, Libertarian Party of
>> ColoradoColorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party
>> Radical Caucus
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hq.lp.org_mailman_listinfo_lnc-2Dbusiness-5Fhq.lp.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=wWePA5Va1fCm0ttiTeJdIi3OtI4h0gCUBlEZrJ7f0XI&e=>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hq.lp.org_mailman_listinfo_lnc-2Dbusiness-5Fhq.lp.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=wWePA5Va1fCm0ttiTeJdIi3OtI4h0gCUBlEZrJ7f0XI&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *In Liberty,*
>>
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpcolorado.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=3CyYsd35iffGrxsilfZ1czCR0oVMAVvw5l_WxZNzv_Y&e=>
>>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpradicalcaucus.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=kihfP26osC5fZJDyE0H_cy-uN_zGxmLOgr0D6_xQQg0&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential,
>> and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
>> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
>> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>> First Data immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from
>> your computer.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>
>
>
>
>
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20161021/e93d13bf/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list