[Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for co-sponsors
Caryn Ann Harlos
carynannharlos at gmail.com
Sun Oct 23 16:27:03 EDT 2016
I doubt NV would not support the censure. A Nevada board member asked me.
This is not blanket precedent. We have money and it is egregious and we
can't not do the right thing because we fear a tyrantatarian future LNC.
On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you on the clarification on who's asking for the censure. I do
> think it would hold a bit more weight if the affiliate was officially
> asking. This body's interference in affiliate matters has caused problems
> before.
>
> My greatest concern, after considering this for days, is the setting of
> precedent. Who's to say that a future LNC might censure for something far
> less; for something legitimately disputed in the party or within the
> broader philosophy?
>
> I don't recall the LNC ever censuring a candidate. In 2008, we had an
> issue with a candidate in KY. We took care of it our way, and we didn't
> look to the LNC to do anything, though many others did ask the LNC to
> intervene. In that scenario, we were able to block the candidate from the
> ballot line and that was that.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
> LPKY Judicial Committee
>
>
>
> On 2016-10-22 00:04, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> The goal is for Libertarian candidates to not completely fundamentally
> betray basic principles in such a flagrant manner and sabotaging the
> efforts in a specific issue of the Party (the affiliate in this case). The
> Motion itself says what we hope - for the candidate to take Libertarian
> stances in the future. If he cannot, then switching to an affiliation that
> accurately reflects his principles is a choice he would have to make. That
> isn't our goal. But it certainly isn't our goal to assist a betrayal of
> the affiliate and principles.
>
> I do not know if we have before. And if there is censurable behaviour to
> a candidate that we have spent members' funds supporting, then yes. That is
> something we should consider doing. Once again, we are the "party of
> principle" and if voting for a 750 million dollar crony capitalist subsidy
> isn't a censurable violation then we have truly lost our way. Asking for a
> bright line rule is once again appropos to my pornography analogy. There
> are a host of factors, and we know it when we see it.
>
> The LPNV has spoken to the candidate. He has given a public explanation.
> This is public accountability.
>
> The affiliate has not officially asked National to censure. Some LPNV
> members have. As have members elsewhere.
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ken.moellman at lpky.org');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I would submit that prior to censure, a conversation might be in order to
>> get more information. We don't even have all of the facts. Here's what we
>> know:
>>
>> 1. We have a candidate who is an elected official, was approved by an
>> affiliate to run as an L, and to which the LNC gave money.
>> 2. The candidate voted for 2 tax increases, the latter of which is to
>> entice a franchise in a monopoly to come to his district.
>> 3. The candidate claims 60% of his constituents supported the latter one.
>> 4. The affiliate that nominated him is angry, has censured the candidate,
>> and has asked National to censure as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, if the goal is to get Moore to switch to some other affiliation or
>> to Independent, then certainly censure would be a good start. But I think
>> it might be good to speak to the elected official first.
>>
>> And the question about "what's the line for this body?" is extremely
>> relevant. Has this body ever censured a candidate or elected
>> Libertarian before? Is this a practice we want this body to make more
>> regular?
>>
>> Again, I'm not in favor of this cronyist garbage, and after Cincinnati
>> signed a similarly-stupid deal with the Bengals, and tied revenue to an
>> increased local sales tax, I just avoid buying things in Cincinnati when
>> possible.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2016-10-21 23:22, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>
>> And I would distinguish greatly a state candidate from our national
>> candidate which was ratified and consented to by delegates at a national
>> convention. A state candidate is ratified by those delegates (in most
>> states and in normal circumstances which do not involve a mid-term Party
>> affiliation switch). In such a case I give great deference to the
>> affiliate that welcomed and championed. And once again, Nevada has made
>> their absolute displeasure and sense of betrayal clear.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> carynannharlos at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carynannharlos at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> I find what if's and mining the subjunctives to be unhelpful
>>> personally. I do not know what kind of transgression would warrant in a
>>> "what if" situation. I would say yes, we should always be willing. Our
>>> duty is not to any elected person but to the Party itself and the
>>> principles for which we stand. This is a clear egregious violation which
>>> is somewhat like what some say about "pornography" - I know it when I see
>>> it. I would ask if someone commits to be a Libertarian and acts completely
>>> against Libertarian principles and received money from the National
>>> Committee of said Party is that committing fraud against the body? If the
>>> constituents feel defrauded (particularly since they elected a Republican,
>>> not a Libertarian) then it is up to them to deal with, not us. Our
>>> standing and duty is to the LP and the members.
>>>
>>> This isn't a minor issue. This was major with a capital M. And Nevada
>>> has made clear how they feel about it.
>>>
>>> The minute was have the "uncensurable" we are doomed. We are the "Party
>>> of Principle" and we need to have the backbone to at some point say enough
>>> is enough, particularly when we spent $10K of our members' money.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ken.moellman at lpky.org');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm glad that the dilemma is understood. And you did bring up the other
>>>> question I had, after further consideration; would we, as a body, be
>>>> willing to censure an elected Libertarian President Johnson? If this is
>>>> the case, how bad would the transgression need to be before this body
>>>> rebukes its own first elected President?
>>>>
>>>> We really need to help give our candidates and elected officials, to
>>>> the limited extent that they exist, be successful champions for liberty.
>>>> And by "we", I mean every person who says they're a libertarian. If we
>>>> can't go out and help convince other people's minds, then we're failing as
>>>> activists and supporters. IMO, the root problem here is that 60% number.
>>>> Why do 60% of the people in Moore's district support this?
>>>>
>>>> As I further discussed this with a few others this afternoon and
>>>> evening, I had another thought. If someone is elected to represent the
>>>> people of his district and fails to do so, would that person be engaging in
>>>> fraud against the constituents?
>>>>
>>>> Every candidate and elected official has negatives. I personally prefer
>>>> to focus on a candidate's positives, rather than dwelling on their
>>>> negatives. If the negatives exceed the positives, then I start looking for
>>>> an alternate course of action.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>>>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>>>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-10-21 16:05, Demarest, David P. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ken,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your honest and thoughtful devil's advocate response
>>>> regarding the proposed censure of John Moore. We can, however, view
>>>> Assemblyman Moore's two egregious votes as an golden opportunity for LNC
>>>> members to think outside the box to examine root causes and design short
>>>> and long term solutions to the difficult dilemma faced by all Libertarian
>>>> politicians. The dilemma is how to reconcile the dictates of one's
>>>> Libertarian conscience with the realities of our current political
>>>> environment that is rife with the cronyism necessary to get elected or
>>>> reelected. The choice is between voting your conscience at the risk of not
>>>> being reelected or violating your conscience to get reelected and live to
>>>> fight another day in office.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would submit that Moore's violation of his conscience to get
>>>> reelected makes him part of the problem of spiraling cronyism that is
>>>> inexorably destroying our way of life and accelerating our economy and
>>>> society down the path of destruction that history demonstrates is the
>>>> inevitable fate of all compulsory territorial governments. Most of us
>>>> support Gary Johnson in spite of specific misgivings because it is obvious
>>>> that Gary is so much better than the other choices and would undoubtedly
>>>> make things far better than the other candidates. If Johnson is elected,
>>>> however, we know that despite his honestly about his platform, many of his
>>>> decisions will give us heartburn. Our short-term act of censuring Moore
>>>> will send a clear and unambiguous message that statist actions by
>>>> Libertarian officials to save political seats are unacceptable violations
>>>> of conscience that will not be tolerated. The proposed censure of Moore
>>>> will serve as an educational message for all present and future Libertarian
>>>> officials including those who switch from other parties.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Long-term solutions require that we understand that cronyism does not
>>>> fare well in the competitive context of the free-market. By contrast,
>>>> cronyism is aggressively fostered in our current compulsory authoritarian
>>>> majority rule system. We as Libertarians face an uphill battle if we choose
>>>> to rely solely on a top-down legislative authoritarian approach to rescue
>>>> us from the tsunami of cronyism that will swamp our ship of state if we do
>>>> not reverse course promptly and with a sense of urgency.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The crushing curse of cronyism will not be reversed until we change the
>>>> context of government to minimize instead of fostering cronyism. To get
>>>> straight to the point, that change in context to discourage cronyism will
>>>> not occur until we achieve competitive governance and competitive social
>>>> services. I would further submit that we must supplement our top-down
>>>> legislative strategy with a robust, bottom-up entrepreneurial peaceful
>>>> freedom revolution fueled by peer-to-peer technology. Then and only then
>>>> will we create the political climate necessary to elect Libertarian
>>>> officials to all levels of government and establish the environment of
>>>> competitive governance and social services that is an absolute prerequisite
>>>> if we seriously intend to minimize cronyism and save our way of life for
>>>> future generations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *The War on Majority Rule Authoritarian Cronyism Begins Now*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~David Pratt Demarest
>>>>
>>>> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (IA, IL, MN,
>>>> MO, ND, NE, WI)
>>>>
>>>> Secretary Pro Tem, LNC Affiliate Support Committee
>>>>
>>>> Secretary, Nebraska Libertarian State Central Committee
>>>>
>>>> Nebraska State Coordinator, LP Radical Caucus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Caryn Ann Harlos [mailto:carynannharlos at gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carynannharlos at gmail.com');>]
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 12:50 PM
>>>> *To:* ken.moellman at lpky.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ken.moellman at lpky.org');>;
>>>> lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lnc-business at hq.lp.org');>
>>>> *Cc:* William Redpath; Demarest, David P.
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for co-sponsors
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We have enough cosponsors for a ballot. I will argue for it in the
>>>> ballot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It was an LPNV who last broached this action
>>>>
>>>> with me - I believe it has the support of the aggrieved affiliate - and
>>>> members- who's money we spent.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The second vote was expressly against something the LPNV was opposed to
>>>> actively for years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a betrayal of the LPNV. And I certainly did not vote (and I
>>>> argued zealously) to support a candidate - out of many worthy candidates -
>>>> who would take such crony capitalist anti/libertarian power.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, October 21, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ken.moellman at lpky.org');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please allow me to take the Devil's Advocate position, since I probably
>>>> won't have a vote that counts anyway. I realize that this position is
>>>> unlikely to be popular.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Politics and philosophy can be a tough balancing act. Certainly, there
>>>> are instances of this problem with our presidential ticket (bake the cake,
>>>> for example) and probably every other campaign out there (vaccination
>>>> debate, etc.). Elected officials, and indeed individuals, are faced with
>>>> tough decisions between philosophy and reality all the time. Perhaps the
>>>> most famous was Jefferson's opposition to slavery while also owning slaves.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Assemblyman Moore reported that a poll of the constituents of his
>>>> district showed that about 60% of the constituents supported the deal,
>>>> including the associated taxes. Certainly, there could and should have been
>>>> a coordinated effort by the opposition to stop this deal by educating the
>>>> public. Based on the level of support reported within Assemblyman Moore's
>>>> district, those efforts were obviously unsuccessful.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Even taking what was said above into account, I personally
>>>> think Assemblyman Moore's greatest failing in this situation came was in
>>>> how he supported the deal. A statement about "While I personally do not
>>>> support this deal, I voted in favor because my constituents wanted me to do
>>>> so" could have been a very good moment. It would have provided an
>>>> opportunity to educate the public about the negatives of the deal and
>>>> hopefully prevent this type of situation from happening the next time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So I ask these questions: Do you think that what John Moore did was
>>>> driven by philosophy, or by politics? Do you believe that John Moore
>>>> wanted higher taxes? As an elected representative, should he represent the
>>>> people of his district, or ignore those people in favor of his own
>>>> philosophy? Is it more wise to go against the constituency, especially
>>>> this close to election day, or is it more wise to fight another day when
>>>> your "army" is more organized and can help you win the day?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just something to think about. I'm not pleased at the idea of yet
>>>> another billionaire getting a taxpayer-funded stadium and I don't believe
>>>> they create enough economic activity to offset the costs. At least the
>>>> team name is appropriate.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>>>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>>>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-10-21 09:27, William Redpath wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I will also co-sponsor, as I was opposed to the $10,000 motion at the
>>>> LNC meeting in July 2016. Bill Redpath
>>>> --------------------------------------------
>>>> On Thu, 10/20/16, David Demarest <dpdemarest at centurylink.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for
>>>> co-sponsors
>>>> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> Cc: david.demarest at firstdata.com
>>>> Date: Thursday, October 20, 2016, 9:20 PM
>>>>
>>>> #yiv9175739729
>>>> #yiv9175739729 --
>>>>
>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15
>>>> 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {font-family:Verdana;panose-1:2 11
>>>> 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
>>>> #yiv9175739729
>>>> #yiv9175739729 p.yiv9175739729MsoNormal, #yiv9175739729
>>>> li.yiv9175739729MsoNormal, #yiv9175739729
>>>> div.yiv9175739729MsoNormal
>>>> {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 a:link, #yiv9175739729
>>>> span.yiv9175739729MsoHyperlink
>>>> {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 a:visited, #yiv9175739729
>>>> span.yiv9175739729MsoHyperlinkFollowed
>>>> {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 p.yiv9175739729msonormal0, #yiv9175739729
>>>> li.yiv9175739729msonormal0, #yiv9175739729
>>>> div.yiv9175739729msonormal0
>>>> {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}
>>>> #yiv9175739729
>>>> span.yiv9175739729gmail-m-7066241125321024756gmail-m6375615
>>>> 45514884297m-7093137337385855135gmail-s1
>>>> {}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 span.yiv9175739729gmail-im
>>>> {}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 span.yiv9175739729EmailStyle20
>>>> {color:windowtext;}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 .yiv9175739729MsoChpDefault
>>>> {}
>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 div.yiv9175739729WordSection1
>>>> {}
>>>> #yiv9175739729 Caryn, I will co-sponsor your
>>>> motion to censure John Moore and request that he return the
>>>> $10,000 campaign contribution from the LNC. Mr. Moore's
>>>> two votes were egregious. Thoughts? Celebrate Life, Set the Bar High
>>>> and LIVE FREE! The Invisible Hand of
>>>> Self-Interest is Mightier Than the Sword of
>>>> Government! ~David Pratt Demaresthttp://www.lpne.org
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpne.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=ZPO-4J67vwV6ByD7vb8knOZpRMrndul0DsYJwqVwT_0&e=>
>>>> secretary at lpne.orgdpdemarest@centurylink.net
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__centurylink.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=37Lwyhxfp0qUBXRvtP01RB9aT0NWx-ASCm0rjSNqLTk&e=>
>>>> david.demarest at firstdata.com
>>>> Cell: 402-981-6469Home: 402-493-0873Office: 402-222-7207 From:
>>>> Lnc-business
>>>> [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>> Sent: Thursday,
>>>> October 20, 2016 7:45 PM
>>>> To:
>>>> lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> Subject:
>>>> [Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for
>>>> co-sponsors
>>>> Multiple
>>>> party members including region 1 members have acted that the
>>>> LNC take action regarding Assemblyman Moore. While normally,
>>>> I would say that is solely an issue for the state party to
>>>> handle, unless possibly, a Federal candidate, but in this
>>>> case, we spent National Party member's direct monies,
>>>> and thus I do agree this is our responsibility. As someone
>>>> who advocated for the funds allocation, I believe it is my
>>>> responsibility to address this once members raised a
>>>> concern:
>>>> Whereas Nevada Assemblyman John
>>>> Moore, a former Republican who in January 2016 switched to
>>>> the Libertarian Party while in office, has during the past
>>>> month voted not once but twice in the span of as many days
>>>> to raise taxes on his constituents, including a vote to
>>>> support a "More Cops" tax which the Libertarian
>>>> Party of Nevada has tirelessly and thus far successfully
>>>> opposed, and a vote to provide a $750 million subsidy to
>>>> finance a billionaire-owned sports stadium at the expense
>>>> of, among others, indigent persons renting weekly rooms in
>>>> motels; and Whereas the elected leaders of our
>>>> state affiliate party in Nevada have rightfully voted to
>>>> censure Assemblyman Moore for these egregious votes;
>>>> and Whereas we wish to convey a strong
>>>> message to all and sundry that while we welcome sitting
>>>> legislators in the Republican or Democrat parties who
>>>> decide to switch to the Libertarian Party as an act of
>>>> conscience, we do not welcome them if they
>>>> intend, as members of our party, to continue voting and
>>>> acting like Republicans or Democrats; Therefore be it resolved that
>>>> the
>>>> Libertarian National Committee hereby censures Assemblyman
>>>> Moore for his recent votes in support of tax increases,
>>>> requests that he return the $10,000 campaign contribution
>>>> which the LNC this season voted to send him, and admonishes
>>>> him to henceforward be a better champion of the values held
>>>> by members of the political party with which he has chosen
>>>> to affiliate if he intends to remain a
>>>> Libertarian.
>>>> --
>>>> In
>>>> Liberty,Caryn Ann
>>>> HarlosRegion 1 Representative,
>>>> Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado,
>>>> Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>> Harlos at LP.orgCommunications Director, Libertarian Party of
>>>> ColoradoColorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party
>>>> Radical Caucus
>>>>
>>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hq.lp.org_mailman_listinfo_lnc-2Dbusiness-5Fhq.lp.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=wWePA5Va1fCm0ttiTeJdIi3OtI4h0gCUBlEZrJ7f0XI&e=>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hq.lp.org_mailman_listinfo_lnc-2Dbusiness-5Fhq.lp.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=wWePA5Va1fCm0ttiTeJdIi3OtI4h0gCUBlEZrJ7f0XI&e=>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>>
>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>>
>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>> Harlos at LP.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>>>>
>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpcolorado.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=3CyYsd35iffGrxsilfZ1czCR0oVMAVvw5l_WxZNzv_Y&e=>
>>>>
>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpradicalcaucus.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=kihfP26osC5fZJDyE0H_cy-uN_zGxmLOgr0D6_xQQg0&e=>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential,
>>>> and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
>>>> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
>>>> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
>>>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>>>> First Data immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from
>>>> your computer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *In Liberty,*
>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>> Harlos at LP.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *In Liberty,*
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org');>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20161023/b382b243/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list