[Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for co-sponsors
Joshua Katz
planning4liberty at gmail.com
Sun Oct 23 20:03:03 EDT 2016
I am trying to catch up on the debate here before I comment. Was there an
email on this thread which begins "One minor correction on the fourth
point..."? If so, can someone please forward it to me? I didn't receive
it, but it's showing up as an unread message preview.
Joshua A. Katz
Westbrook CT Planning Commission (L in R seat)
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net> wrote:
> I agree that the precedent we set here is a matter of concern. The
> precedent I'm concerned about is the possibility of a Libertarian
> officeholder casting votes like the ones in question and not facing serious
> repercussions from the party.
>
> Love & Liberty,
> ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> (415) 625-FREE
> @StarchildSF
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> I doubt NV would not support the censure. A Nevada board member asked me.
>
> This is not blanket precedent. We have money and it is egregious and we
> can't not do the right thing because we fear a tyrantatarian future LNC.
>
> On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank you on the clarification on who's asking for the censure. I do
>> think it would hold a bit more weight if the affiliate was officially
>> asking. This body's interference in affiliate matters has caused problems
>> before.
>>
>> My greatest concern, after considering this for days, is the setting of
>> precedent. Who's to say that a future LNC might censure for something far
>> less; for something legitimately disputed in the party or within the
>> broader philosophy?
>>
>> I don't recall the LNC ever censuring a candidate. In 2008, we had an
>> issue with a candidate in KY. We took care of it our way, and we didn't
>> look to the LNC to do anything, though many others did ask the LNC to
>> intervene. In that scenario, we were able to block the candidate from the
>> ballot line and that was that.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>
>>
>> On 2016-10-22 00:04, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>
>> The goal is for Libertarian candidates to not completely fundamentally
>> betray basic principles in such a flagrant manner and sabotaging the
>> efforts in a specific issue of the Party (the affiliate in this case). The
>> Motion itself says what we hope - for the candidate to take Libertarian
>> stances in the future. If he cannot, then switching to an affiliation that
>> accurately reflects his principles is a choice he would have to make. That
>> isn't our goal. But it certainly isn't our goal to assist a betrayal of
>> the affiliate and principles.
>>
>> I do not know if we have before. And if there is censurable behaviour to
>> a candidate that we have spent members' funds supporting, then yes. That is
>> something we should consider doing. Once again, we are the "party of
>> principle" and if voting for a 750 million dollar crony capitalist subsidy
>> isn't a censurable violation then we have truly lost our way. Asking for a
>> bright line rule is once again appropos to my pornography analogy. There
>> are a host of factors, and we know it when we see it.
>>
>> The LPNV has spoken to the candidate. He has given a public
>> explanation. This is public accountability.
>>
>> The affiliate has not officially asked National to censure. Some LPNV
>> members have. As have members elsewhere.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would submit that prior to censure, a conversation might be in order
>>> to get more information. We don't even have all of the facts. Here's what
>>> we know:
>>>
>>> 1. We have a candidate who is an elected official, was approved by an
>>> affiliate to run as an L, and to which the LNC gave money.
>>> 2. The candidate voted for 2 tax increases, the latter of which is to
>>> entice a franchise in a monopoly to come to his district.
>>> 3. The candidate claims 60% of his constituents supported the latter one.
>>> 4. The affiliate that nominated him is angry, has censured the
>>> candidate, and has asked National to censure as well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, if the goal is to get Moore to switch to some other affiliation or
>>> to Independent, then certainly censure would be a good start. But I think
>>> it might be good to speak to the elected official first.
>>>
>>> And the question about "what's the line for this body?" is extremely
>>> relevant. Has this body ever censured a candidate or elected
>>> Libertarian before? Is this a practice we want this body to make more
>>> regular?
>>>
>>> Again, I'm not in favor of this cronyist garbage, and after Cincinnati
>>> signed a similarly-stupid deal with the Bengals, and tied revenue to an
>>> increased local sales tax, I just avoid buying things in Cincinnati when
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2016-10-21 23:22, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>>>
>>> And I would distinguish greatly a state candidate from our national
>>> candidate which was ratified and consented to by delegates at a national
>>> convention. A state candidate is ratified by those delegates (in most
>>> states and in normal circumstances which do not involve a mid-term Party
>>> affiliation switch). In such a case I give great deference to the
>>> affiliate that welcomed and championed. And once again, Nevada has made
>>> their absolute displeasure and sense of betrayal clear.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I find what if's and mining the subjunctives to be unhelpful
>>>> personally. I do not know what kind of transgression would warrant in a
>>>> "what if" situation. I would say yes, we should always be willing. Our
>>>> duty is not to any elected person but to the Party itself and the
>>>> principles for which we stand. This is a clear egregious violation which
>>>> is somewhat like what some say about "pornography" - I know it when I see
>>>> it. I would ask if someone commits to be a Libertarian and acts completely
>>>> against Libertarian principles and received money from the National
>>>> Committee of said Party is that committing fraud against the body? If the
>>>> constituents feel defrauded (particularly since they elected a Republican,
>>>> not a Libertarian) then it is up to them to deal with, not us. Our
>>>> standing and duty is to the LP and the members.
>>>>
>>>> This isn't a minor issue. This was major with a capital M. And Nevada
>>>> has made clear how they feel about it.
>>>>
>>>> The minute was have the "uncensurable" we are doomed. We are the
>>>> "Party of Principle" and we need to have the backbone to at some point say
>>>> enough is enough, particularly when we spent $10K of our members' money.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm glad that the dilemma is understood. And you did bring up the
>>>>> other question I had, after further consideration; would we, as a body, be
>>>>> willing to censure an elected Libertarian President Johnson? If this is
>>>>> the case, how bad would the transgression need to be before this body
>>>>> rebukes its own first elected President?
>>>>>
>>>>> We really need to help give our candidates and elected officials, to
>>>>> the limited extent that they exist, be successful champions for liberty.
>>>>> And by "we", I mean every person who says they're a libertarian. If we
>>>>> can't go out and help convince other people's minds, then we're failing as
>>>>> activists and supporters. IMO, the root problem here is that 60% number.
>>>>> Why do 60% of the people in Moore's district support this?
>>>>>
>>>>> As I further discussed this with a few others this afternoon and
>>>>> evening, I had another thought. If someone is elected to represent the
>>>>> people of his district and fails to do so, would that person be engaging in
>>>>> fraud against the constituents?
>>>>>
>>>>> Every candidate and elected official has negatives. I personally
>>>>> prefer to focus on a candidate's positives, rather than dwelling on their
>>>>> negatives. If the negatives exceed the positives, then I start looking for
>>>>> an alternate course of action.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>>>>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>>>>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-10-21 16:05, Demarest, David P. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your honest and thoughtful devil's advocate response
>>>>> regarding the proposed censure of John Moore. We can, however, view
>>>>> Assemblyman Moore's two egregious votes as an golden opportunity for LNC
>>>>> members to think outside the box to examine root causes and design short
>>>>> and long term solutions to the difficult dilemma faced by all Libertarian
>>>>> politicians. The dilemma is how to reconcile the dictates of one's
>>>>> Libertarian conscience with the realities of our current political
>>>>> environment that is rife with the cronyism necessary to get elected or
>>>>> reelected. The choice is between voting your conscience at the risk of not
>>>>> being reelected or violating your conscience to get reelected and live to
>>>>> fight another day in office.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would submit that Moore's violation of his conscience to get
>>>>> reelected makes him part of the problem of spiraling cronyism that is
>>>>> inexorably destroying our way of life and accelerating our economy and
>>>>> society down the path of destruction that history demonstrates is the
>>>>> inevitable fate of all compulsory territorial governments. Most of us
>>>>> support Gary Johnson in spite of specific misgivings because it is obvious
>>>>> that Gary is so much better than the other choices and would undoubtedly
>>>>> make things far better than the other candidates. If Johnson is elected,
>>>>> however, we know that despite his honestly about his platform, many of his
>>>>> decisions will give us heartburn. Our short-term act of censuring Moore
>>>>> will send a clear and unambiguous message that statist actions by
>>>>> Libertarian officials to save political seats are unacceptable violations
>>>>> of conscience that will not be tolerated. The proposed censure of Moore
>>>>> will serve as an educational message for all present and future Libertarian
>>>>> officials including those who switch from other parties.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Long-term solutions require that we understand that cronyism does not
>>>>> fare well in the competitive context of the free-market. By contrast,
>>>>> cronyism is aggressively fostered in our current compulsory authoritarian
>>>>> majority rule system. We as Libertarians face an uphill battle if we choose
>>>>> to rely solely on a top-down legislative authoritarian approach to rescue
>>>>> us from the tsunami of cronyism that will swamp our ship of state if we do
>>>>> not reverse course promptly and with a sense of urgency.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The crushing curse of cronyism will not be reversed until we change
>>>>> the context of government to minimize instead of fostering cronyism. To get
>>>>> straight to the point, that change in context to discourage cronyism will
>>>>> not occur until we achieve competitive governance and competitive social
>>>>> services. I would further submit that we must supplement our top-down
>>>>> legislative strategy with a robust, bottom-up entrepreneurial peaceful
>>>>> freedom revolution fueled by peer-to-peer technology. Then and only then
>>>>> will we create the political climate necessary to elect Libertarian
>>>>> officials to all levels of government and establish the environment of
>>>>> competitive governance and social services that is an absolute prerequisite
>>>>> if we seriously intend to minimize cronyism and save our way of life for
>>>>> future generations.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *The War on Majority Rule Authoritarian Cronyism Begins Now*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~David Pratt Demarest
>>>>>
>>>>> Region 6 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (IA, IL, MN,
>>>>> MO, ND, NE, WI)
>>>>>
>>>>> Secretary Pro Tem, LNC Affiliate Support Committee
>>>>>
>>>>> Secretary, Nebraska Libertarian State Central Committee
>>>>>
>>>>> Nebraska State Coordinator, LP Radical Caucus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Caryn Ann Harlos [mailto:carynannharlos at gmail.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 12:50 PM
>>>>> *To:* ken.moellman at lpky.org; lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> *Cc:* William Redpath; Demarest, David P.
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for co-sponsors
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We have enough cosponsors for a ballot. I will argue for it in the
>>>>> ballot.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It was an LPNV who last broached this action
>>>>>
>>>>> with me - I believe it has the support of the aggrieved affiliate -
>>>>> and members- who's money we spent.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The second vote was expressly against something the LPNV was opposed
>>>>> to actively for years.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a betrayal of the LPNV. And I certainly did not vote (and I
>>>>> argued zealously) to support a candidate - out of many worthy candidates -
>>>>> who would take such crony capitalist anti/libertarian power.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, October 21, 2016, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lpky.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please allow me to take the Devil's Advocate position, since I
>>>>> probably won't have a vote that counts anyway. I realize that this
>>>>> position is unlikely to be popular.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Politics and philosophy can be a tough balancing act. Certainly,
>>>>> there are instances of this problem with our presidential ticket (bake the
>>>>> cake, for example) and probably every other campaign out there (vaccination
>>>>> debate, etc.). Elected officials, and indeed individuals, are faced with
>>>>> tough decisions between philosophy and reality all the time. Perhaps the
>>>>> most famous was Jefferson's opposition to slavery while also owning slaves.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Assemblyman Moore reported that a poll of the constituents of his
>>>>> district showed that about 60% of the constituents supported the deal,
>>>>> including the associated taxes. Certainly, there could and should have been
>>>>> a coordinated effort by the opposition to stop this deal by educating the
>>>>> public. Based on the level of support reported within Assemblyman Moore's
>>>>> district, those efforts were obviously unsuccessful.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Even taking what was said above into account, I personally
>>>>> think Assemblyman Moore's greatest failing in this situation came was in
>>>>> how he supported the deal. A statement about "While I personally do not
>>>>> support this deal, I voted in favor because my constituents wanted me to do
>>>>> so" could have been a very good moment. It would have provided an
>>>>> opportunity to educate the public about the negatives of the deal and
>>>>> hopefully prevent this type of situation from happening the next time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So I ask these questions: Do you think that what John Moore did was
>>>>> driven by philosophy, or by politics? Do you believe that John Moore
>>>>> wanted higher taxes? As an elected representative, should he represent the
>>>>> people of his district, or ignore those people in favor of his own
>>>>> philosophy? Is it more wise to go against the constituency, especially
>>>>> this close to election day, or is it more wise to fight another day when
>>>>> your "army" is more organized and can help you win the day?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just something to think about. I'm not pleased at the idea of yet
>>>>> another billionaire getting a taxpayer-funded stadium and I don't believe
>>>>> they create enough economic activity to offset the costs. At least the
>>>>> team name is appropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
>>>>> LNC Region 3 Alternate Representative
>>>>> LPKY Judicial Committee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-10-21 09:27, William Redpath wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I will also co-sponsor, as I was opposed to the $10,000 motion at the
>>>>> LNC meeting in July 2016. Bill Redpath
>>>>> --------------------------------------------
>>>>> On Thu, 10/20/16, David Demarest <dpdemarest at centurylink.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for
>>>>> co-sponsors
>>>>> To: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> Cc: david.demarest at firstdata.com
>>>>> Date: Thursday, October 20, 2016, 9:20 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> #yiv9175739729
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 --
>>>>>
>>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
>>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15
>>>>> 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
>>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {font-family:Verdana;panose-1:2 11
>>>>> 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 p.yiv9175739729MsoNormal, #yiv9175739729
>>>>> li.yiv9175739729MsoNormal, #yiv9175739729
>>>>> div.yiv9175739729MsoNormal
>>>>> {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 a:link, #yiv9175739729
>>>>> span.yiv9175739729MsoHyperlink
>>>>> {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 a:visited, #yiv9175739729
>>>>> span.yiv9175739729MsoHyperlinkFollowed
>>>>> {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 p.yiv9175739729msonormal0, #yiv9175739729
>>>>> li.yiv9175739729msonormal0, #yiv9175739729
>>>>> div.yiv9175739729msonormal0
>>>>> {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729
>>>>> span.yiv9175739729gmail-m-7066241125321024756gmail-m6375615
>>>>> 45514884297m-7093137337385855135gmail-s1
>>>>> {}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 span.yiv9175739729gmail-im
>>>>> {}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 span.yiv9175739729EmailStyle20
>>>>> {color:windowtext;}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 .yiv9175739729MsoChpDefault
>>>>> {}
>>>>> _filtered #yiv9175739729 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 div.yiv9175739729WordSection1
>>>>> {}
>>>>> #yiv9175739729 Caryn, I will co-sponsor your
>>>>> motion to censure John Moore and request that he return the
>>>>> $10,000 campaign contribution from the LNC. Mr. Moore's
>>>>> two votes were egregious. Thoughts? Celebrate Life, Set the Bar
>>>>> High
>>>>> and LIVE FREE! The Invisible Hand of
>>>>> Self-Interest is Mightier Than the Sword of
>>>>> Government! ~David Pratt Demaresthttp://www.lpne.org
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpne.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=ZPO-4J67vwV6ByD7vb8knOZpRMrndul0DsYJwqVwT_0&e=>
>>>>> secretary at lpne.orgdpdemarest@centurylink.net
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__centurylink.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=37Lwyhxfp0qUBXRvtP01RB9aT0NWx-ASCm0rjSNqLTk&e=>
>>>>> david.demarest at firstdata.com
>>>>> Cell: 402-981-6469Home: 402-493-0873Office: 402-222-7207 From:
>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>> [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>> Sent: Thursday,
>>>>> October 20, 2016 7:45 PM
>>>>> To:
>>>>> lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> [Lnc-business] Motion: Assemblyman Moore - request for
>>>>> co-sponsors
>>>>> Multiple
>>>>> party members including region 1 members have acted that the
>>>>> LNC take action regarding Assemblyman Moore. While normally,
>>>>> I would say that is solely an issue for the state party to
>>>>> handle, unless possibly, a Federal candidate, but in this
>>>>> case, we spent National Party member's direct monies,
>>>>> and thus I do agree this is our responsibility. As someone
>>>>> who advocated for the funds allocation, I believe it is my
>>>>> responsibility to address this once members raised a
>>>>> concern:
>>>>> Whereas Nevada Assemblyman John
>>>>> Moore, a former Republican who in January 2016 switched to
>>>>> the Libertarian Party while in office, has during the past
>>>>> month voted not once but twice in the span of as many days
>>>>> to raise taxes on his constituents, including a vote to
>>>>> support a "More Cops" tax which the Libertarian
>>>>> Party of Nevada has tirelessly and thus far successfully
>>>>> opposed, and a vote to provide a $750 million subsidy to
>>>>> finance a billionaire-owned sports stadium at the expense
>>>>> of, among others, indigent persons renting weekly rooms in
>>>>> motels; and Whereas the elected leaders of our
>>>>> state affiliate party in Nevada have rightfully voted to
>>>>> censure Assemblyman Moore for these egregious votes;
>>>>> and Whereas we wish to convey a strong
>>>>> message to all and sundry that while we welcome sitting
>>>>> legislators in the Republican or Democrat parties who
>>>>> decide to switch to the Libertarian Party as an act of
>>>>> conscience, we do not welcome them if they
>>>>> intend, as members of our party, to continue voting and
>>>>> acting like Republicans or Democrats; Therefore be it resolved that
>>>>> the
>>>>> Libertarian National Committee hereby censures Assemblyman
>>>>> Moore for his recent votes in support of tax increases,
>>>>> requests that he return the $10,000 campaign contribution
>>>>> which the LNC this season voted to send him, and admonishes
>>>>> him to henceforward be a better champion of the values held
>>>>> by members of the political party with which he has chosen
>>>>> to affiliate if he intends to remain a
>>>>> Libertarian.
>>>>> --
>>>>> In
>>>>> Liberty,Caryn Ann
>>>>> HarlosRegion 1 Representative,
>>>>> Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado,
>>>>> Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>>> Harlos at LP.orgCommunications Director, Libertarian Party of
>>>>> ColoradoColorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party
>>>>> Radical Caucus
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hq.lp.org_mailman_listinfo_lnc-2Dbusiness-5Fhq.lp.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=wWePA5Va1fCm0ttiTeJdIi3OtI4h0gCUBlEZrJ7f0XI&e=>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hq.lp.org_mailman_listinfo_lnc-2Dbusiness-5Fhq.lp.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=wWePA5Va1fCm0ttiTeJdIi3OtI4h0gCUBlEZrJ7f0XI&e=>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>>>
>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>>> Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpcolorado.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=3CyYsd35iffGrxsilfZ1czCR0oVMAVvw5l_WxZNzv_Y&e=>
>>>>>
>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lpradicalcaucus.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=ewHkv9vLloTwhsKn5d4bTdoqsmBfyfooQX5O7EQLv5TtBZ1CwcvjU063xndfqI8U&r=POfq57_C0OM3236VPm9_N_9MhP1EEP_0raNPnh6qDnw&m=IV7aAHavSnzME6gqttSJKf9UdcwCKTeGCnzR9X5ehTM&s=kihfP26osC5fZJDyE0H_cy-uN_zGxmLOgr0D6_xQQg0&e=>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or
>>>>> confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message
>>>>> is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
>>>>> delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>>>>> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
>>>>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
>>>>> please notify First Data immediately by replying to this message and
>>>>> deleting it from your computer.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>> Harlos at LP.org
>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *In Liberty,*
>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>> Harlos at LP.org
>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *In Liberty,*
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20161023/782a4aa2/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list