[Lnc-business] Chair's Proposed Agenda - LNC Meeting December 10-11, 2016

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

Alicia would the Truth in Polling Resolution be considered a public policy
resolution?  I don't believe so.  Can you please let me know?:

And considering these Notice requirements, I ask the Chair to withdraw my
marijuana resolution from the agenda.  I will take it up either by email or
at the next full LNC meeting.

-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Alicia - THANK YOU.  I was a bit unclear on that.
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 6, 2016, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On our standard agenda format are two separate new business categories,
>> one with previous notice, and one without.
>>
>> Our draft agenda has 10 items under "with previous notice", and none
>> under "without".  However, only 2 of those 10 items actually met previous
>> notice requirements (Committee Transparency, and Review of 2016 Campaign).
>> The rest should instead be categorized under "without previous notice".
>>
>> Please note that the requirements for previous notice are outlined in
>> Policy Manual Section 1.02.1.  The most commonly used method is to send the
>> exact wording of the motion to the LNC at least 14 days in advance.  Merely
>> requesting an agenda item without providing the language of a motion to be
>> offered, or sending the motion wording fewer than 14 days in advance is not
>> sufficient to gain the "with previous notice" status.
>>
>> For some things, the distinction only affects the order in which we take
>> the items up.  The agenda template was designed to reward earlier placement
>> to people who did give previous notice.
>>
>> For motions to amend something previously adopted, and for public policy
>> resolutions, having previous notice (or lack thereof) makes a difference in
>> what vote is required to adopt the motion.  Placing an item in the wrong
>> category could result in us making a mistake in determining what vote
>> threshold must be met.
>>
>> Just a reminder that we need to be conscious of the difference on those
>> agenda items.
>>
>> -Alicia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I've attached a draft proposed agenda for the meeting on December 10
>>> and 11.  I've made efforts to accommodate all requests for time I've
>>> received and still have the meeting fit within the time available.
>>> Please let me know if there are requests I've missed or changes you
>>> would suggest.
>>>
>>> Yours truly,
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>>
>>


-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20161206/94255962/attachment-0002.html>