[Lnc-business] Chair's Proposed Agenda - LNC Meeting December 10-11, 2016

[Alicia Mattson]

Yes, Caryn Ann, I can see your email.  I'm very pressed for time and
haven't yet re-read the motion with that specific question in mind.  If
it's questionable whether it is a public policy resolution or not, we can
ask the LNC what they think before we take it up.

-Alicia


On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Alicia, if you see this, can you please let me know?
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Alicia would the Truth in Polling Resolution be considered a public
>> policy resolution?  I don't believe so.  Can you please let me know?:
>>
>> And considering these Notice requirements, I ask the Chair to withdraw my
>> marijuana resolution from the agenda.  I will take it up either by email or
>> at the next full LNC meeting.
>>
>> --
>> *In Liberty,*
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Alicia - THANK YOU.  I was a bit unclear on that.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 6, 2016, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On our standard agenda format are two separate new business categories,
>>>> one with previous notice, and one without.
>>>>
>>>> Our draft agenda has 10 items under "with previous notice", and none
>>>> under "without".  However, only 2 of those 10 items actually met previous
>>>> notice requirements (Committee Transparency, and Review of 2016 Campaign).
>>>> The rest should instead be categorized under "without previous notice".
>>>>
>>>> Please note that the requirements for previous notice are outlined in
>>>> Policy Manual Section 1.02.1.  The most commonly used method is to send the
>>>> exact wording of the motion to the LNC at least 14 days in advance.  Merely
>>>> requesting an agenda item without providing the language of a motion to be
>>>> offered, or sending the motion wording fewer than 14 days in advance is not
>>>> sufficient to gain the "with previous notice" status.
>>>>
>>>> For some things, the distinction only affects the order in which we
>>>> take the items up.  The agenda template was designed to reward earlier
>>>> placement to people who did give previous notice.
>>>>
>>>> For motions to amend something previously adopted, and for public
>>>> policy resolutions, having previous notice (or lack thereof) makes a
>>>> difference in what vote is required to adopt the motion.  Placing an item
>>>> in the wrong category could result in us making a mistake in determining
>>>> what vote threshold must be met.
>>>>
>>>> Just a reminder that we need to be conscious of the difference on those
>>>> agenda items.
>>>>
>>>> -Alicia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've attached a draft proposed agenda for the meeting on December 10
>>>>> and 11.  I've made efforts to accommodate all requests for time I've
>>>>> received and still have the meeting fit within the time available.
>>>>> Please let me know if there are requests I've missed or changes you
>>>>> would suggest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours truly,
>>>>> Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *In Liberty,*
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20161209/def6dbf9/attachment-0002.html>