[Lnc-business] Credit where credit is due – Request for LP press release on Trump's bold regulatory reforms

Tue Jan 31 11:13:34 EST 2017

I agree with Dan. Federal regulations are devastating.

Health care regs alone kill more human beings worldwide than does war. That
includes millions of victims in the U.S. resulting from FDA regulations on
life-saving drugs, not to mention the damage done by Obamacare, ERISA,
HIPPA, SCHIP, and thousands of other health care regulations.

Federal regs also kill millions of jobs every year and wipe out substantial
swaths of human prosperity -- and accounts for a lot of why so many
Americans live in poverty today.

Federal regs turn peaceful, responsible Americans into criminals.

The list goes on...

Carla Howell

"The system [of government our Founding Fathers designed] has turned into a
congealed ball of lard that eats money and excretes red tape.

- Scott Adams

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Daniel Hayes <danielehayes at icloud.com>
wrote:

> Starchild,
>
> The problem is, Trump signed an order saying for every new regulation
> created 2 must be eliminated.  But his chief of staff had ordered the
> Federal agencies to create no new regulations.  While that freezes things
> for the moment. If they were really shrinking regulations Priebus would now
> command each agency to create 5 new regulations a week. This would result
> in a net reduction of thousands of Federal regulations per week.
>
> That all said, while I think it's a gimmick ultimately, part of what we do
> is all about perception and this would be a move in the right direction. I
> would like to see such a press release issued as well.  I think that quote
> you pulled about regulation being bad for big business  but worse for small
> business is awesome.
>
> Especially since we have LIB in our name it is important we show we are
> not just bunch of modern liberals. It is also important that we show we are
> not just a bunch of negative complainers with nothing positive to say. But
> when we praise leaders of other parties we must be careful to not do it too
> often or in a way so that people think we are part of their team.
>
> Also, hair braiding regulations are not FEDERAL those are state. There are
> hundreds of thousands of federal regulations many of which have the force
> of criminal penalty behind them.  This is NOT a trivial issue.
>
> I agree that the right way to fix it is to have congress change the way
> regulations can be created and administered.  In the mean time.. I take
> what I can get.
>
> Daniel Hayes
> LNC At Large Member
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 6:50 AM, Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> Like most Libertarians, I was dismayed upon hearing of Donald Trump's
> cruel and unconstitutional executive order issued Friday barring refugees
> from entering the United States, and singling out people from seven
> Muslim-majority countries to be denied admittance as well, initially
> including even green card holders (though embarrassingly for the
> administration, they later had to backpedal on that). People across the
> country are protesting the ban, and rightly so:
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/29/watch-
> live-protests-outside-white-house-over-immigration-ban/97216470/
>
> Thus I was very glad to see the LP quickly issued a strong press release
> condemning the action and making it clear that we support the Muslims whose
> rights are being violated – https://www.lp.org/we_stand_with_you/ . The
> unequivocal "We stand with you" declaration is exactly the kind of language
> I think we ought to be using more often when communicating to victims of
> the State, and I commend Lauren Daugherty or whoever came up with it (her
> name appears in the byline at https://www.lp.org/we_stand_with_you/ ).
>
> Yesterday, however, it turns out that Trump did something equally
> momentous but really positive – and I'm not being sarcastic! As was alluded
> to in Thomas Knapp's Rational Review Digest l where I read about it (
> http://rationalreview.com/archives/245914), Libertarians like writer L.
> Neil Smith have been advocating such a reform for years. If it is carried
> out and enforced, this will mean a sea change in the right direction:
>
> *"President Trump on Monday signed an executive order that would require
> agencies to revoke two regulations for every new rule they want to issue.
> The executive order is aimed at dramatically rolling back federal
> regulations, one of his top campaign promises. … Trump's order does make
> exceptions for emergencies and national security."*
>
> http://thehill.com/regulation/overnights/316893-overnight-
> regulation-trump-orders-one-in-two-out-plan-for-regs
>
> While this doesn't change my view that Donald Trump in the White House
> remains a disaster waiting to happen, it's nice to see such dramatic proof
> that the executive pen won't be solely wielded to tighten the screws of the
> incipient police state.
>
> Possibly even more exciting, the article also notes that the Trump
> administration has already imposed a regulatory freeze:
>
>
> *"White House chief of staff Reince Priebus sent a memo to agency heads
> hours after the inauguration advising them not to issue any more
> regulations."*
> The president even had something intelligent and nuanced to say on the
> subject:
>
> "This isn't a knock on President Obama; this is a knock on many
> president[s] preceding me," he said, referring to the burdens on
> businesses. "Regulation has been horrible for big business, but it's been
> worse for small business."
>
> Further according to the Hill article, Trump also said he isn't done
> targeting regulations, and reiterated "his campaign promise to try and cut
> 75 percent of rules." Dare we hope that he actually means it?
>
> While I wouldn't want to see us make a habit of praising the ruling
> establishment, in the spirit of fairness and giving credit where credit is
> due, I encourage the chair and/or staff to issue a Libertarian Party press
> release commending the new administration for these actions.
>
> Here are a couple factoids from The Hill piece that could be good to cite
> in a release:
>
> *"The U.S. isn't the first country to impose such a restriction on
> regulators. Trump could use similar policies in Canada, Australia and the
> United Kingdom as a model for his order. *
>
> *For every rule issued in the U.K., three existing rules must be
> eliminated.*
>
> *According to a U.K. government report, that requirement saved businesses
> £885 million from May 5, 2015 to May 26, 2016, or nearly $1.1 billion based
> on current conversion rates."*
> Love & Liberty,
>                                   ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>                                 (415) 625-FREE
>                                    @StarchildSF
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20170131/7e540951/attachment-0002.html>