[Lnc-business] draft minutes of 04/15/17 LNC session

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

I do think "New Jersey" should be included in the toss notes.




On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:01 AM Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:

> That was a close one.  Hagan edged out Katz by only a few minutes to earn
> the brownie point.  Can we get a membership check on Ima Waldo, for
> register #3??
>
> -Alicia
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Tim Hagan <timhagan-tyr at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Page 15, third paragraph, should the minutes state that Ms Harlos called
>> "New Jersey" for the coin toss?
>>
>> Page 86, Bylaws and Rules Committee applicant Ima Waldo is not a member
>> of the party, and therefore not eligible to serve on the committee. Mr
>> Redpath's nomination of the slate excluded ineligible committee applicants.
>>
>> Tim Hagan
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com>
>> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 22, 2017 3:02 PM
>> *Subject:* [Lnc-business] draft minutes of 04/15/17 LNC session
>>
>> Attached are the first draft minutes from the April 15-16, 2017 LNC
>> meeting.
>>
>> Please note that comments from the LNC on the minutes are due by May 7.
>>
>> I have heard no one express any issue with dubbing the newly formed
>> committee as the Social Media Process Review Committee, so that's what I've
>> called it in the minutes.
>>
>> I see that my footer text disappeared starting with the Region 5 Report
>> appendix.  I didn't spot it until after I had my PDF built.  I've fixed it
>> in the underlying file so it will look right in the next update, but I
>> didn't take the time to rebuild the PDF just for that.
>>
>> There was a snafu with Mr. Somes' motion regarding Paladin Strategies.
>> When he originally stated the motion he said the contract would be for up
>> to 3 months.  When I requested more precise wording in writing for the
>> minutes, the written version said for up to 6 months, and I didn't
>> immediately notice the discrepancy, and that's what I typed.  All of you
>> heard 3 months, and you couldn't see that the written version said 6
>> months, so Mr. Hagan's amendment was based on the 3 months * $5,000/mo =
>> $15,000.  Twice during the debate, including right before the vote, the
>> chair read the motion from my screen, so he read 6 months.  RONR prescribes
>> that the language read just prior to the vote is the official language in
>> such a situation, so the minutes say 6 months.  That makes the $15,000
>> amendment look odd, but that's what happened.
>>
>> -Alicia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20170425/3a49b360/attachment-0002.html>