[Lnc-business] Request for co-sponsors for motion to support campaign of Joe Buchman

Caryn Ann Harlos carynannharlos at gmail.com
Tue Jul 11 17:48:10 EDT 2017 

Joe is also a friend of mine, and yes, he is "okay" with it, meaning no ill
feelings as he is a long-term and dedicated member of the Party who
understands that this is business, he certainly urged me to ask, and has
been asking me for updates-- so it would mean a great to him and his
campaign.  This is the only Federal race going on right now - and he just
scored a victory getting into a previously denied debate.  I have explained
the realities of the situation with having no set standards yet and he
understands -- but he certainly did ask me to pursue this.  And members
have asked me about it.

As to funding ballot access, though I respect my predecessor Norm immensely
- he and I are of different minds when it comes to ballot access funding -
he would routinely vote no.  I have always voted yes.  There are many
reasons for that but one issue that arises is that Region 1 gets short
shrift in that - or it can **appear** so.  I am fully on board with the
idea that nationwide ballot access benefits everyone, but it is certainly
true that these funds do not go to Region 1 - with the highest numerical
amounts of affiliates (9 states).  Utah is Region 1 and helping with a
Region 1 campaign helps to balance this out and thus far, I have had the
full support of my regional chairs when supporting ballot access funding
because I press the case that region 1 is getting benefits from pushing
national memberships and in their national membership.

I also urge other members to give a contribution.  I will be doing so when
I see how this month's finances go.

I thank David and Whitney for co-sponsoring.  *I ask for one more.*

--Caryn Ann

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:13 PM, William Redpath <wredpath2 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Joe Buchman is a multi-decade friend of mine.  I thank him very much for
> running--he jumped in at the last minute when another candidate backed
> out--and wish him the best in his Campaign.  I have personally contributed
> $201 to Joe Buchman's Campaign.  I urge other members of the LNC to do so,
> as well.  However, I am opposed to the LNC contributing to his Campaign.  I
> have discussed this with Joe, and he is OK with no LNC funding of his
> Campaign.  I wish we did, but the LNC currently does not have the resources
> to be contributing to many, if any, candidates, particularly when we have
> other needs, including ballot access in Tennessee and Alabama.  And, we
> have Ohio to finish, and that is a big job.
>
> I ask people not to co-sponsor this motion and, should it become a motion,
> to vote "No."
>
> Bill Redpath
> --------------------------------------------
> On Tue, 7/11/17, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com
> <https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/b/compose?to=carynannharlos@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Request for co-sponsors for motion to support
> campaign of Joe Buchman
> To: "Libertarian National Committee list" <lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> <https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/b/compose?to=lnc-business@hq.lp.org>>
> Cc: "Joseph Buchman" <drbuchman at gmail.com
> <https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/b/compose?to=drbuchman@gmail.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017, 1:31 PM
>
> Joe got in
> the debates - this is getting momentum.  I am once again
> asking for the needed co-sponsors.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, David Demarest <dprattdemarest at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I will co-sponsor.
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2017 12:32 PM, "Caryn Ann Harlos" <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Joe got in the debates - this is getting momentum.  I am once again
>>> asking for the needed co-sponsors.
>>>
>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Hayes <danielehayes at icloud.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nick,
>>>>
>>>> I am sure you are already on it but would this warrant a letter from
>>>> Oliver?  It sounds like it may.  Only including two people from the old
>>>> establishment parties in the debate, for the sake of time as the criteria I
>>>> have seen for the inclusion, doesn't seem unbiased to me.  AFP is a
>>>> non-profit as I recall. That might put AFP in an even more precarious
>>>> position than the television station in Montana.
>>>>
>>>> As this is regarding potential legal action, I don't expect much of a
>>>> response here on this public list.  I am certain the letters,
>>>> correspondence, filings and other actions, if appropriate, will be put into
>>>> action by those with the letters J.D. behind their name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Hayes
>>>> LNC At Large Member
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 11, 2017, at 1:31 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dr. Buchman sent this to me this morning to provide an answer to Ken's
>>>> inquiry and to give information and a request about the debates he has been
>>>> excluded from.  It did not make it to my inbox however and he re-sent to me
>>>> after speaking on the phone this evening and since that time he has been
>>>> officially denied debate access (as per the response I posted in another
>>>> LNC business thread).  But please take this information into consideration
>>>> in this request.
>>>>
>>>> I know that we want to develop a candidate assistance procedure.  And I
>>>> understand that is on the agenda for August. But I ask please do not let
>>>> that get in the way of assisting a candidate now.  It is not the fault of
>>>> the candidates that we don't yet have such a procedure and this is in the
>>>> only Federal race now - great opportunity to get attention for a committed
>>>> Libertarian candidate.  Please consider this request..... and in member
>>>> relations purpose, it does not help member confidence when we are not
>>>> assisting when we can in a race that has the sole stage right now.
>>>>
>>>> >>>Why won't we assist with the campaign of this candidate in the
>>>> Federal race?
>>>>
>>>> >>>Because we don't have criteria for assistance.
>>>>
>>>> >>>Why don't you have criteria?
>>>>
>>>> >>>Because we haven't done it yet.
>>>>
>>>> >>>So candidates suffer from LNC lack of establishment of protocol?
>>>>
>>>> The Mark Wicks donation invigorated that race and our members.  This
>>>> could do likewise.  Please co-sponsor my request.
>>>>
>>>> The below is from Dr. Buchman:
>>>>
>>>> ===========
>>>>
>>>> I am asking for help from those who have connections with Americans for
>>>> Prosperity in my request to be included in their Third District candidate
>>>> debates.  Please see the email I sent to them copied below and help if you
>>>> can.
>>>>
>>>> As I said in the KSL interview, the first step toward winning is
>>>> getting into these debates.  I see getting into the debates as where the
>>>> focus should be, just as a mountain climber focuses on the next step, or
>>>> Governor Johnson focuses on the next curve in his mountain road.  To focus
>>>> on "winning the race" rather than those immediate intermediate goals is not
>>>> a winning strategy; it's delusional.   I did not say, and have never
>>>> said,  "I am not going to win."  What I said was: "I am not running to
>>>> win . . . primarily I am running, first, to get into the debates."   I
>>>> also said: "The chances of a Libertarian winning the Third District in
>>>> Utah are not impossible; I’m swinging; I’m going to go for it; I’m giving
>>>> it everything I have. "
>>>>
>>>> I sure wish saying that had made every KSL and LNC listener "happy."
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave it to others to discern if my interview with Doug Wright
>>>> (has invited me back again) is fairly characterized as a "concession
>>>> speech."
>>>>
>>>> If that has left you off-put for listening to the entire interview, I'd
>>>> ask you  read the following for the full context and  reconsider:
>>>>
>>>> WRIGHT: This gentleman has some KSL connections that we’ll talk about
>>>> some other time, but I want to really get into the motivation, what caused
>>>> you to want to get into this race; you’ve got a PhD, you’re running as a
>>>> Libertarian, so let’s just set the stage. Give us a little background on
>>>> you and why you are in this race.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BUCHMAN: You know Doug, when I walked into your waiting room, I see
>>>> there in the lobby, huge letters on the wall, “A Light of Truth in the
>>>> World.” The truth that I run on is the foundation of Libertarian politics
>>>> which is the fundamental principle in our philosophy that drives our
>>>> politics, our ethics, our morality and those other fields of philosophy of
>>>> which politics is one, is pretty simple, that is that no human being should
>>>> have the right to initiate force, violence against others, to initiate
>>>> force. And then the second core principle is that you either own your
>>>> physical body, it’s yours to do with as you see fit, or you’re part slave;
>>>> you’re owned by someone else. So we take the principles of non-initiation
>>>> of aggression and self-ownership and we apply them to politics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Like you said, I am a college professor, that’s where I am coming
>>>> from.  I am not running to win, the chances of a Libertarian winning the
>>>> Third District in Utah are not impossible; I’m swinging; I’m going to go
>>>> for it; I’m giving it everything I have . . .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WRIGHT: right . . .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BUCHMAN: . . . if I can get Rosie O’ Donnell to retweet something, who
>>>> knows . . .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WRIGHT: It worked for Dr. Allen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BUCHMAN: . . . or Drew Carey, or Penn & Teller or some other
>>>> Libertarians who we are reaching out to, who knows? Anything is possible;
>>>> but primarily I am running, first of all, to get into the debates. We need
>>>> a Libertarian voice in the debates.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My email to Americans for Prosperity:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Joseph Buchman <drbuchman at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 3:45 PM
>>>> Subject: Third District Candidate debate
>>>> To: infout at afphq.org
>>>>
>>>> I am writing as the Libertarian Party of Utah's candidate for the Third
>>>> District to request inclusion in the debates sponsored by Americans For
>>>> Prosperity.
>>>>
>>>> See, for example, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154532862
>>>> 572120&set=gm.1744266952269118&type=3&theater
>>>>
>>>> I am on the ballot as a General Election candidate for this office, see:
>>>>
>>>> https://elections.utah.gov/election-resources/2017-candidate-filings
>>>>
>>>> In the absence of an invitation to participate in your debates, may I
>>>> inquire of the standards/process for your selection of candidates?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your attention to this request,
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> These debates were announced on Friday; the first debate is to be held
>>>> tomorrow (Tuesday evening).  I'll be there either in the audience or
>>>> on the stage. See:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.sltrib.com/news/5485360-155/two-debates-set-for-t
>>>> hree-republican
>>>>
>>>> And while they are now being repurposed as for the "Republican primary
>>>> candidates only" please note the portion of the article which indicates the
>>>> Democrat was invited.
>>>>
>>>> "Democrat Kathie Allen — who's raised nearly $700,000 in donations —
>>>> did not respond to an invitation to join the event, Everton said."
>>>>
>>>> Evelyn Everton is the Utah State Director for Americans for Prosperity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Again any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> I hope you'll listen to the entire KSL interview and form your own
>>>> opinion of it.  I'm sure I could have done better and continue to seek your
>>>> constructive feedback as well as help in having Americans for Prosperity
>>>> include the Libertarian in their debates.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for your consideration,
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>> _______________________
>>>> Joseph G. Buchman, PhD
>>>> 584 Hillside Circle
>>>> Alpine UT 84004
>>>> +++++++++++
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------Caryn Ann
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>>>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Very good points Starchild and both views are represented in our
>>>>> membership.
>>>>>
>>>>> I certainly hope we don't divisively "take sides" on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:07 AM Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're certainly not the first Libertarian to express a disappointed
>>>>>> emotional reaction to a candidate's realistic appraisal of his or her
>>>>>> chances, but to you and any other Libertarian who has felt this way, I say
>>>>>> take heart! One can lose in conventional terms and still win in libertarian
>>>>>> terms. A *conventional* win means the warm body you
>>>>>> support occupying the sought-after office. A *libertarian* win,
>>>>>> however, means advancing the cause of freedom! Such wins can happen in any
>>>>>> number of ways – building momentum for a future run, exposing more people
>>>>>> to libertarian ideas, building the party, etc. Of course the cause of
>>>>>> freedom is *usually* more likely to be advanced by a Libertarian
>>>>>> occupying the sought-after office than by not occupying it – but it isn't
>>>>>> the be-all, end-all it's too often made out to be. In some ways, the real
>>>>>> fight begins *after* an election is won. If an elected Libertarian
>>>>>> isn't mentally prepared to stick to his or her libertarian principles and
>>>>>> positions, or doesn't have solidly libertarian principles or positions to
>>>>>> begin with, the real, post-election fight for what s/he will do in office
>>>>>> is as good as lost. Amid the statist culture and pressures in which s/he
>>>>>> will be immersed, such an elected Libertarian will have little chance of
>>>>>> surviving with an agenda to advance the cause of freedom intact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Predicting* an election loss also isn't the same thing as
>>>>>> *conceding*. When a candidate *concedes* a race, s/he is saying "the
>>>>>> campaign is over, my opponent won". Clearly Joe Buchman is saying no such
>>>>>> thing! From appearances, he is running and will continue to run a vigorous
>>>>>> campaign and seek as much exposure for our ideas and as many votes as
>>>>>> possible. He is running to win in libertarian terms. But is it wise to
>>>>>> predict a loss at the ballot box? While miracles occasionally do happen
>>>>>> and I've suggested candidates leave the perceptions door open by not
>>>>>> entirely ruling out the possibility of getting elected, I would much rather
>>>>>> see a Libertarian fighting a long-shot campaign – and this is obviously a
>>>>>> long-shot campaign; no Libertarian has come close to being elected to
>>>>>> Congress – say flat-out that s/he won't win, than to flat-out say that s/he
>>>>>> will. Any candidate facing those kind of odds who predicts electoral
>>>>>> victory is either deceiving him/herself, or attempting to deceive others.
>>>>>> The former shows a poor grasp of reality, while the latter shows a lack of
>>>>>> integrity. Neither reflects well on the candidate! Joe, by contrast, showed
>>>>>> his good character by giving an honest and realistic assessment of his
>>>>>> chances. For every person out there who thinks, 'I want to vote for someone
>>>>>> who tells me s/he's going to win', I believe there's another person out
>>>>>> there thinking, 'I want to vote for someone who has integrity and tells the
>>>>>> truth'. To which type of voter mentality should we, as the Party of
>>>>>> Principle, be trying to appeal?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Love & Liberty,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                                      ((( starchild )))
>>>>>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>                           RealReform at earthlink.net
>>>>>>                                   (415) 625-FREE
>>>>>>                                    @StarchildSF
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 12:00 AM, Ken Moellman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found out about this campaign yesterday (now, 2 days ago) and the
>>>>>> referenced KSL interview almost immediately starts with the candidate
>>>>>> saying "I'm not going to win."  It made me sad. More importantly, I can't
>>>>>> agree to give money to someone who has already conceded the race.  I mean,
>>>>>> what is the money going to be used for?  Losing better?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By contrast, from what I can see, candidates like Laura Ebke and at
>>>>>> least one of the recent converts in NH are gearing up re-election campaigns
>>>>>> with the intent to win. They certainly haven't publicly conceded, anyway.
>>>>>> There are lots of candidates throughout the country gearing up for 2018
>>>>>> races. 4 L converts and many other candidates looking to run winnable
>>>>>> races.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this body decides to support candidates, I'd really rather see
>>>>>> this body support candidates that are running to win.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>>>>>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello everyone, I received the below request from Dr. Joe Buchman
>>>>>>> (Utah) and have been speaking with him about this for the past few weeks.
>>>>>>> I would like us to consider assisting him to our maximum allowed of 5K.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ========
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To the members of the LNC:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The resignation of Representative Chaffetz nine days ago from the
>>>>>>> Third District of Utah has created a Special Election to be held 7
>>>>>>> November 2017.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joe Buchman is the Libertarian Candidate for that seat and following
>>>>>>> a special election convention by the Libertarian Party of Utah is on the
>>>>>>> ballot for November 7th.   There is a Democratic opponent.  Three
>>>>>>> Republicans will face each other in a primary next month.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See: https://elections.utah.gov/election-resources/2017-cand
>>>>>>> idate-filings
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is, we believe, the only remaining contest for federal office
>>>>>>> in 2017 with a Libertarian candidate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To date Dr. Buchman has invested $1,000.00 of his personal funds in
>>>>>>> the campaign and has raised approximately $250.00 from other donors, with
>>>>>>> promises for about $500 in process.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joe has just been scheduled as the sole guest for the first hour of
>>>>>>> Coast to Coast AM, a national networked late-night radio talk show with an
>>>>>>> estimated *2.5 million listeners*, for *Saturday evening, July
>>>>>>> 29th, 10:05PM to 11:00PM Pacific time*.  Past show hosts Art Bell
>>>>>>> and Rollye James were self-identified Libertarians, and past guests have
>>>>>>> included Judge Jim Gray, Michael Badnarik, Aaron Russo, Harry Browne, Andre
>>>>>>> Marrou and Dr. Buchman himself (in 2008, when he last ran for the US
>>>>>>> Congress).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/search/?query=libertarian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joe will be discussing his campaign for the US Congress, his
>>>>>>> platform as an expression of the NAP and Self-Ownership paradigms, will be
>>>>>>> directing listeners to his website and will be requesting donations.  The
>>>>>>> Coast to Coast website will also provide a link to his campaign site -
>>>>>>> www.GotoL.vote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a request for national party funding for this singularly
>>>>>>> important Special Election campaign.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The resignation of Representative Chaffetz has already generated
>>>>>>> significant national media attention, and this race is likely to continue
>>>>>>> to generate national media coverage as the replacement of Congressman
>>>>>>> Chaffetz will reflect, to some degree, a measure of voter confidence in the
>>>>>>> Trump administration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Libertarian Party nationally will benefit from this election,
>>>>>>> the last of 2017 to include a Libertarian candidate for federal office.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If a funding agreement can be reached prior to the show, Dr. Buchman
>>>>>>> would then appeal to Coast to Coast listeners with a promise that any
>>>>>>> donations received during the show will be matched dollar-for-dollar.  The
>>>>>>> show will be replayed and will also be available as a download from the
>>>>>>> network website.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joe has been interviewed by three local papers (the Salt Lake
>>>>>>> Tribune, Deseret News and City Weekly) and by KSL Radio's Doug Wright.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That 9 minute radio interview can be found at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.ksl.com/?nid=1388&a=11898
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bottom line: Joe is experienced with media interviews, had a prior
>>>>>>> career in radio (including working with Bill Redpath at WTTS radio in the
>>>>>>> 1970s), is passionate about both Libertarian political pragmatism and
>>>>>>> philosophy, *and is currently scheduled for one of the most visible
>>>>>>> media appearances by any Libertarian Candidate this month* (and
>>>>>>> perhaps for the remainder of this year).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This special election creates something of a special case for
>>>>>>> funding; an amount equivalent to that provided to the recent candidate in
>>>>>>> Montana would seem equitable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With gratitude for your consideration of this request,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PS If you do choose to listen to the KSL interview and/or to review
>>>>>>> the website and links to the print interviews there; ALL feedback,
>>>>>>> suggestions for improvement are also welcomed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>>>>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>>>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>>>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>> *We defend your rights*
>>>>>>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>>>>>> *Taxation is theft*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>>>
>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>> *We defend your rights*
>>>>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>>>> *Taxation is theft*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>>
>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>> *We defend your rights*
>>>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>>> *Taxation is theft*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *In Liberty,*
>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org>
>>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>
>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>> *We defend your rights*
>>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>> *Taxation is theft*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>


-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20170711/06bb888d/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Lnc-business mailing list