[Lnc-business] Request for co-sponsors for motion to support campaign of Joe Buchman
Caryn Ann Harlos
carynannharlos at gmail.com
Thu Jul 13 14:42:24 EDT 2017
THANK YOU STARCHILD:
So yes we now have the co-sponsors required for a Motion for the LNC to
contribute $5,000 to support the campaign of Joe Buchman (Utah).
Motion co-sponsors: Caryn Ann Harlos, David Demarest, Starchild, Whitney
Bilyeu
If that is not the understanding of any of the co-sponsors let me know.
THANK YOU!!! Dr. Buchman THANKS YOU!!!!
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I've been torn over this. I consider Joe both a good friend and a
> principled libertarian with excellent ethical instincts, a lack of burning
> ambition, and solid enough balls to stand up and speak out on principle
> when he sees something wrong going on – in short, just the kind of
> Libertarian we need in office. He is waging a radical and spirited campaign
> for public office using wit and humor, the kind of campaign that does us
> credit.
>
> Nevertheless I am also very much in agreement with Sam Goldstein that we
> need to stop appropriating candidate funds in an ad hoc manner. To do so is
> unfair and probably on the whole produces results that are far from
> optimum, much like awarding contracts without competitive bidding or hiring
> new employees without an open call for applicants. Having not long before
> we received this request presented to the LNC a proposal to address this
> situation, I was at that time of a mind not to support any more such
> requests until we either approve it, or adopt some other reasonable
> approach that strives for fairness, consistency, and equal opportunity in
> how we allocate funds.
>
> Yet against this intent I must now weigh the obvious merits of Joe
> Buchman's campaign and Caryn Ann's strong case on his behalf, including the
> fact that this is the big national campaign we have going right now, and
> Joe is getting great exposure. In the end it is possible I am allowing
> myself to be swayed by friendship and personal familiarity and regard,
> which is precisely the danger of the way we are conducting this process (or
> lack of a process), and if some feel I am making the wrong decision I can't
> really blame them. Nevertheless, I'm going to go ahead and co-sponsor in
> the knowledge that we'll be supporting a terrific candidate and a man of
> integrity who I trust to spend the money wisely.
>
> So I gather we now have the requisite four votes.
>
> Love & Liberty,
>
> ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> RealReform at earthlink.net
> (415) 625-FREE
> @StarchildSF
>
>
>
> On Jul 13, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
>
> Joe did very well in the debate - he only had the questions ahead of time
> for a few hours while the old party candidates had them for a few weeks.
> He is now working hard to get in the next major debate. This is a
> candidate doing a real campaign... looking for one more co-sponsor.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> http://kutv.com/news/local/3rd-district-candidates-try-
> to-break-out-of-the-pack-at-debate-in-provo
>
> ==But Curtis came with a target on his back. When he told the crowd the
> federal government's proper role included overseeing currency, Buchman
> pounced.
> "Mr. Mayor, I apologize but I get to correct you," he said. "As someone
> who earned a PhD and an MBA in finance, the Federal Reserve is a private
> bank."==
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:30 PM, David Demarest <
> dpdemarest at centurylink.net> wrote:
>
>> Regarding Dr. Buchman’s alleged “I can’t win” comment, Larry Sharpe has
>> pointed out that despite the admittedly formidable odds against Larry
>> winning the 2018 New York Governor’s race, it will be worth it not only to
>> lay a foundation for the future but also, and just as important, to provide
>> considerable credibility and word-of-mouth publicity impact to down-ticket
>> races.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> ~David
>>
>>
>>
>> *2018 Omaha Roads to Liberty Un-Convention*
>>
>>
>>
>> ~David Pratt Demarest
>>
>> LNC Region 6 Representative (IA, IL, MN, MO, ND, NE, WI)
>>
>> LSLA Vice-Chair
>>
>> LPNE State Central Committee, Secretary
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Lnc-business [mailto:lnc-business-bounces at hq.lp.org] *On Behalf
>> Of *Ken Moellman
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:33 PM
>> *To:* lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Lnc-business] Request for co-sponsors for motion to
>> support campaign of Joe Buchman
>>
>>
>>
>> I cannot co-sponsor because I'm an alternate. However, I have had
>> several conversations and I want to chime back in and revise my statements
>> from my initial email.
>>
>>
>>
>> I do not know Dr. Buchman personally, and nothing I said before was meant
>> to be personal. As a former campaign manager, anything that sounds like "I
>> can't win" makes me want to set the room on fire. I'm a bit sensitive on
>> that matter.
>>
>>
>>
>> Since that time, I have learned more information.
>>
>>
>>
>> The core issue is the use of the funds. If the funds are being used to
>> increase the ability of the campaign to do long-term outreach (supplies
>> promoting the LP, building local parties, etc.), I could be convinced to
>> support such a measure. By contrast, if the funds are being used to
>> purchase supplies like yard signs or other "temporary" campaign-related
>> costs, I'd definitely be against it.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm just an alternate, so my vote rarely counts. But after obtaining
>> more information and further thought on the matter, I felt it necessary to
>> append my previous comments with these.
>>
>>
>>
>> ken
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Joe is also a friend of mine, and yes, he is "okay" with it, meaning no
>> ill feelings as he is a long-term and dedicated member of the Party who
>> understands that this is business, he certainly urged me to ask, and has
>> been asking me for updates-- so it would mean a great to him and his
>> campaign. This is the only Federal race going on right now - and he just
>> scored a victory getting into a previously denied debate. I have explained
>> the realities of the situation with having no set standards yet and he
>> understands -- but he certainly did ask me to pursue this. And members
>> have asked me about it.
>>
>>
>>
>> As to funding ballot access, though I respect my predecessor Norm
>> immensely - he and I are of different minds when it comes to ballot access
>> funding - he would routinely vote no. I have always voted yes. There are
>> many reasons for that but one issue that arises is that Region 1 gets short
>> shrift in that - or it can **appear** so. I am fully on board with the
>> idea that nationwide ballot access benefits everyone, but it is certainly
>> true that these funds do not go to Region 1 - with the highest numerical
>> amounts of affiliates (9 states). Utah is Region 1 and helping with a
>> Region 1 campaign helps to balance this out and thus far, I have had the
>> full support of my regional chairs when supporting ballot access funding
>> because I press the case that region 1 is getting benefits from pushing
>> national memberships and in their national membership.
>>
>>
>>
>> I also urge other members to give a contribution. I will be doing so
>> when I see how this month's finances go.
>>
>>
>>
>> I thank David and Whitney for co-sponsoring. *I ask for one more.*
>>
>>
>>
>> --Caryn Ann
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:13 PM, William Redpath <wredpath2 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Joe Buchman is a multi-decade friend of mine. I thank him very much for
>> running--he jumped in at the last minute when another candidate backed
>> out--and wish him the best in his Campaign. I have personally contributed
>> $201 to Joe Buchman's Campaign. I urge other members of the LNC to do so,
>> as well. However, I am opposed to the LNC contributing to his Campaign. I
>> have discussed this with Joe, and he is OK with no LNC funding of his
>> Campaign. I wish we did, but the LNC currently does not have the resources
>> to be contributing to many, if any, candidates, particularly when we have
>> other needs, including ballot access in Tennessee and Alabama. And, we
>> have Ohio to finish, and that is a big job.
>>
>>
>>
>> I ask people not to co-sponsor this motion and, should it become a
>> motion, to vote "No."
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Redpath
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>>
>> On Tue, 7/11/17, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com
>> <https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/b/compose?to=carynannharlos@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Lnc-business] Request for co-sponsors for motion to support
>> campaign of Joe Buchman
>>
>> To: "Libertarian National Committee list" <lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> <https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/b/compose?to=lnc-business@hq.lp.org>>
>>
>> Cc: "Joseph Buchman" <drbuchman at gmail.com
>> <https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/b/compose?to=drbuchman@gmail.com>>
>>
>> Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017, 1:31 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe got in
>>
>> the debates - this is getting momentum. I am once again
>>
>> asking for the needed co-sponsors.
>>
>> -Caryn Ann
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, David Demarest <dprattdemarest at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I will co-sponsor.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2017 12:32 PM, "Caryn Ann Harlos" <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Joe got in the debates - this is getting momentum. I am once again
>> asking for the needed co-sponsors.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Caryn Ann
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Hayes <danielehayes at icloud.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Nick,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am sure you are already on it but would this warrant a letter from
>> Oliver? It sounds like it may. Only including two people from the old
>> establishment parties in the debate, for the sake of time as the criteria I
>> have seen for the inclusion, doesn't seem unbiased to me. AFP is a
>> non-profit as I recall. That might put AFP in an even more precarious
>> position than the television station in Montana.
>>
>>
>>
>> As this is regarding potential legal action, I don't expect much of a
>> response here on this public list. I am certain the letters,
>> correspondence, filings and other actions, if appropriate, will be put into
>> action by those with the letters J.D. behind their name.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel Hayes
>>
>> LNC At Large Member
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2017, at 1:31 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <carynannharlos at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dr. Buchman sent this to me this morning to provide an answer to Ken's
>> inquiry and to give information and a request about the debates he has been
>> excluded from. It did not make it to my inbox however and he re-sent to me
>> after speaking on the phone this evening and since that time he has been
>> officially denied debate access (as per the response I posted in another
>> LNC business thread). But please take this information into consideration
>> in this request.
>>
>>
>>
>> I know that we want to develop a candidate assistance procedure. And I
>> understand that is on the agenda for August. But I ask please do not let
>> that get in the way of assisting a candidate now. It is not the fault of
>> the candidates that we don't yet have such a procedure and this is in the
>> only Federal race now - great opportunity to get attention for a committed
>> Libertarian candidate. Please consider this request..... and in member
>> relations purpose, it does not help member confidence when we are not
>> assisting when we can in a race that has the sole stage right now.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>Why won't we assist with the campaign of this candidate in the Federal
>> race?
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>Because we don't have criteria for assistance.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>Why don't you have criteria?
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>Because we haven't done it yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>So candidates suffer from LNC lack of establishment of protocol?
>>
>>
>>
>> The Mark Wicks donation invigorated that race and our members. This
>> could do likewise. Please co-sponsor my request.
>>
>>
>>
>> The below is from Dr. Buchman:
>>
>>
>>
>> ===========
>>
>>
>>
>> I am asking for help from those who have connections with Americans for
>> Prosperity in my request to be included in their Third District candidate
>> debates. Please see the email I sent to them copied below and help if you
>> can.
>>
>>
>>
>> As I said in the KSL interview, the first step toward winning is getting
>> into these debates. I see getting into the debates as where the focus
>> should be, just as a mountain climber focuses on the next step, or Governor
>> Johnson focuses on the next curve in his mountain road. To focus on
>> "winning the race" rather than those immediate intermediate goals is not a
>> winning strategy; it's delusional. I did not say, and have never said,
>> "I am not going to win." What I said was: "I am not running to win . . .
>> primarily I am running, first, to get into the debates." I also said:
>> "The chances of a Libertarian winning the Third District in Utah are not
>> impossible; I’m swinging; I’m going to go for it; I’m giving it everything
>> I have. "
>>
>>
>>
>> I sure wish saying that had made every KSL and LNC listener "happy."
>>
>>
>>
>> I'll leave it to others to discern if my interview with Doug Wright (has
>> invited me back again) is fairly characterized as a "concession speech."
>>
>>
>>
>> If that has left you off-put for listening to the entire interview, I'd
>> ask you read the following for the full context and reconsider:
>>
>>
>>
>> WRIGHT: This gentleman has some KSL connections that we’ll talk about
>> some other time, but I want to really get into the motivation, what caused
>> you to want to get into this race; you’ve got a PhD, you’re running as a
>> Libertarian, so let’s just set the stage. Give us a little background on
>> you and why you are in this race.
>>
>>
>>
>> BUCHMAN: You know Doug, when I walked into your waiting room, I see there
>> in the lobby, huge letters on the wall, “A Light of Truth in the World.”
>> The truth that I run on is the foundation of Libertarian politics which is
>> the fundamental principle in our philosophy that drives our politics, our
>> ethics, our morality and those other fields of philosophy of which politics
>> is one, is pretty simple, that is that no human being should have the right
>> to initiate force, violence against others, to initiate force. And then the
>> second core principle is that you either own your physical body, it’s yours
>> to do with as you see fit, or you’re part slave; you’re owned by someone
>> else. So we take the principles of non-initiation of aggression and
>> self-ownership and we apply them to politics.
>>
>>
>>
>> Like you said, I am a college professor, that’s where I am coming from.
>> I am not running to win, the chances of a Libertarian winning the Third
>> District in Utah are not impossible; I’m swinging; I’m going to go for it;
>> I’m giving it everything I have . . .
>>
>>
>>
>> WRIGHT: right . . .
>>
>>
>>
>> BUCHMAN: . . . if I can get Rosie O’ Donnell to retweet something, who
>> knows . . .
>>
>>
>>
>> WRIGHT: It worked for Dr. Allen.
>>
>>
>>
>> BUCHMAN: . . . or Drew Carey, or Penn & Teller or some other Libertarians
>> who we are reaching out to, who knows? Anything is possible; but primarily
>> I am running, first of all, to get into the debates. We need a Libertarian
>> voice in the debates.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> My email to Americans for Prosperity:
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Joseph Buchman <drbuchman at gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 3:45 PM
>> Subject: Third District Candidate debate
>> To: infout at afphq.org
>>
>> I am writing as the Libertarian Party of Utah's candidate for the Third
>> District to request inclusion in the debates sponsored by Americans For
>> Prosperity.
>>
>>
>>
>> See, for example, https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154532862
>> 572120&set=gm.1744266952269118&type=3&theater
>>
>>
>>
>> I am on the ballot as a General Election candidate for this office, see:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://elections.utah.gov/election-resources/2017-candidate-filings
>>
>>
>>
>> In the absence of an invitation to participate in your debates, may I
>> inquire of the standards/process for your selection of candidates?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your attention to this request,
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> These debates were announced on Friday; the first debate is to be held
>> tomorrow (Tuesday evening). I'll be there either in the audience or on
>> the stage. See:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.sltrib.com/news/5485360-155/two-debates-set-for-
>> three-republican
>>
>>
>>
>> And while they are now being repurposed as for the "Republican primary
>> candidates only" please note the portion of the article which indicates the
>> Democrat was invited.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Democrat Kathie Allen — who's raised nearly $700,000 in donations — did
>> not respond to an invitation to join the event, Everton said."
>>
>>
>>
>> Evelyn Everton is the Utah State Director for Americans for Prosperity.
>>
>>
>>
>> Again any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope you'll listen to the entire KSL interview and form your own
>> opinion of it. I'm sure I could have done better and continue to seek your
>> constructive feedback as well as help in having Americans for Prosperity
>> include the Libertarian in their debates.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks again for your consideration,
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> _______________________
>> Joseph G. Buchman, PhD
>>
>> 584 Hillside Circle
>>
>> Alpine UT 84004
>>
>> +++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------Caryn Ann
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Very good points Starchild and both views are represented in our
>> membership.
>>
>>
>>
>> I certainly hope we don't divisively "take sides" on that.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Caryn Ann
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:07 AM Starchild <sfdreamer at earthlink.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>>
>>
>> You're certainly not the first Libertarian to express a disappointed
>> emotional reaction to a candidate's realistic appraisal of his or her
>> chances, but to you and any other Libertarian who has felt this way, I say
>> take heart! One can lose in conventional terms and still win in libertarian
>> terms. A *conventional* win means the warm body you support occupying
>> the sought-after office. A *libertarian* win, however, means advancing
>> the cause of freedom! Such wins can happen in any number of ways – building
>> momentum for a future run, exposing more people to libertarian ideas,
>> building the party, etc. Of course the cause of freedom is *usually*
>> more likely to be advanced by a Libertarian occupying the sought-after
>> office than by not occupying it – but it isn't the be-all, end-all it's too
>> often made out to be. In some ways, the real fight begins *after* an
>> election is won. If an elected Libertarian isn't mentally prepared to stick
>> to his or her libertarian principles and positions, or doesn't have solidly
>> libertarian principles or positions to begin with, the real, post-election
>> fight for what s/he will do in office is as good as lost. Amid the statist
>> culture and pressures in which s/he will be immersed, such an elected
>> Libertarian will have little chance of surviving with an agenda to advance
>> the cause of freedom intact.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Predicting* an election loss also isn't the same thing as *conceding*.
>> When a candidate *concedes* a race, s/he is saying "the campaign is
>> over, my opponent won". Clearly Joe Buchman is saying no such thing! From
>> appearances, he is running and will continue to run a vigorous campaign and
>> seek as much exposure for our ideas and as many votes as possible. He is
>> running to win in libertarian terms. But is it wise to predict a loss at
>> the ballot box? While miracles occasionally do happen and I've suggested
>> candidates leave the perceptions door open by not entirely ruling out the
>> possibility of getting elected, I would much rather see a Libertarian
>> fighting a long-shot campaign – and this is obviously a long-shot campaign;
>> no Libertarian has come close to being elected to Congress – say flat-out
>> that s/he won't win, than to flat-out say that s/he will. Any candidate
>> facing those kind of odds who predicts electoral victory is either
>> deceiving him/herself, or attempting to deceive others. The former shows a
>> poor grasp of reality, while the latter shows a lack of integrity. Neither
>> reflects well on the candidate! Joe, by contrast, showed his good character
>> by giving an honest and realistic assessment of his chances. For every
>> person out there who thinks, 'I want to vote for someone who tells me
>> s/he's going to win', I believe there's another person out there thinking,
>> 'I want to vote for someone who has integrity and tells the truth'. To
>> which type of voter mentality should we, as the Party of Principle, be
>> trying to appeal?
>>
>>
>>
>> Love & Liberty,
>>
>>
>>
>> ((( starchild )))
>>
>> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>>
>> RealReform at earthlink.net
>>
>> (415) 625-FREE
>>
>> @StarchildSF
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 12:00 AM, Ken Moellman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I found out about this campaign yesterday (now, 2 days ago) and the
>> referenced KSL interview almost immediately starts with the candidate
>> saying "I'm not going to win." It made me sad. More importantly, I can't
>> agree to give money to someone who has already conceded the race. I mean,
>> what is the money going to be used for? Losing better?
>>
>>
>>
>> By contrast, from what I can see, candidates like Laura Ebke and at least
>> one of the recent converts in NH are gearing up re-election campaigns with
>> the intent to win. They certainly haven't publicly conceded, anyway. There
>> are lots of candidates throughout the country gearing up for 2018 races. 4
>> L converts and many other candidates looking to run winnable races.
>>
>>
>>
>> If this body decides to support candidates, I'd really rather see this
>> body support candidates that are running to win.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone, I received the below request from Dr. Joe Buchman (Utah)
>> and have been speaking with him about this for the past few weeks. I would
>> like us to consider assisting him to our maximum allowed of 5K.
>>
>>
>>
>> ========
>>
>>
>>
>> To the members of the LNC:
>>
>>
>>
>> The resignation of Representative Chaffetz nine days ago from the Third
>> District of Utah has created a Special Election to be held 7 November
>> 2017.
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe Buchman is the Libertarian Candidate for that seat and following a
>> special election convention by the Libertarian Party of Utah is on the
>> ballot for November 7th. There is a Democratic opponent. Three
>> Republicans will face each other in a primary next month.
>>
>>
>> See: https://elections.utah.gov/election-resources/2017-candidate-filings
>>
>>
>>
>> This is, we believe, the only remaining contest for federal office in
>> 2017 with a Libertarian candidate.
>>
>>
>>
>> To date Dr. Buchman has invested $1,000.00 of his personal funds in the
>> campaign and has raised approximately $250.00 from other donors, with
>> promises for about $500 in process.
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe has just been scheduled as the sole guest for the first hour of Coast
>> to Coast AM, a national networked late-night radio talk show with an
>> estimated *2.5 million listeners*, for *Saturday** evening, July 29th,
>> 10:05PM to 11:00PM Pacific time*. Past show hosts Art Bell and Rollye
>> James were self-identified Libertarians, and past guests have included
>> Judge Jim Gray, Michael Badnarik, Aaron Russo, Harry Browne, Andre Marrou
>> and Dr. Buchman himself (in 2008, when he last ran for the US Congress).
>>
>>
>> See: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/search/?query=libertarian
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe will be discussing his campaign for the US Congress, his platform as
>> an expression of the NAP and Self-Ownership paradigms, will be directing
>> listeners to his website and will be requesting donations. The Coast to
>> Coast website will also provide a link to his campaign site -
>> www.GotoL.vote
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a request for national party funding for this singularly
>> important Special Election campaign.
>>
>>
>>
>> The resignation of Representative Chaffetz has already generated
>> significant national media attention, and this race is likely to continue
>> to generate national media coverage as the replacement of Congressman
>> Chaffetz will reflect, to some degree, a measure of voter confidence in the
>> Trump administration.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Libertarian Party nationally will benefit from this election, the
>> last of 2017 to include a Libertarian candidate for federal office.
>>
>>
>>
>> If a funding agreement can be reached prior to the show, Dr. Buchman
>> would then appeal to Coast to Coast listeners with a promise that any
>> donations received during the show will be matched dollar-for-dollar. The
>> show will be replayed and will also be available as a download from the
>> network website.
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe has been interviewed by three local papers (the Salt Lake Tribune,
>> Deseret News and City Weekly) and by KSL Radio's Doug Wright.
>>
>>
>>
>> That 9 minute radio interview can be found at:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.ksl.com/?nid=1388&a=11898
>>
>>
>>
>> Bottom line: Joe is experienced with media interviews, had a prior career
>> in radio (including working with Bill Redpath at WTTS radio in the 1970s),
>> is passionate about both Libertarian political pragmatism and philosophy, *and
>> is currently scheduled for one of the most visible media appearances by any
>> Libertarian Candidate this month* (and perhaps for the remainder of this
>> year).
>>
>>
>>
>> This special election creates something of a special case for funding; an
>> amount equivalent to that provided to the recent candidate in Montana would
>> seem equitable.
>>
>>
>>
>> With gratitude for your consideration of this request,
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> PS If you do choose to listen to the KSL interview and/or to review the
>> website and links to the print interviews there; ALL feedback, suggestions
>> for improvement are also welcomed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *In Liberty,*
>>
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>
>> *We defend your rights*
>>
>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>
>> *Taxation is theft*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>> --
>>
>> *In Liberty,*
>>
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>
>> *We defend your rights*
>>
>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>
>> *Taxation is theft*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *In Liberty,*
>>
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>
>> *We defend your rights*
>>
>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>
>> *Taxation is theft*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *In Liberty,*
>>
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>
>> *We defend your rights*
>>
>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>
>> *Taxation is theft*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *In Liberty,*
>>
>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>
>> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
>> Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
>> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
>>
>> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
>> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
>>
>> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
>> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
>>
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>
>> *We defend your rights*
>>
>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>
>> *Taxation is theft*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
> Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
> Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
> Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
> <http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
> Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
> <http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org/>
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> *We defend your rights*
> *And oppose the use of force*
> *Taxation is theft*
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business_hq.lp.org
>
>
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org>
Colorado State Coordinator, Libertarian Party Radical Caucus
<http://www.lpradicalcaucus.org>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20170713/e2e72c79/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list