[Lnc-business] Proposed proviso to the Ballot Access Expense line

[Joshua Katz]

Won't this cause timing issues if, for instance, the state contribution is
mostly volunteer, and money is needed to bring in petitioners?

Joshua A. Katz


On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Ken Moellman <ken.moellman at lp.org> wrote:

> I'm okay with this.  To be fair, New York and Illinois have proven
> themselves as capable, so adding bureaucracy to states that have proven the
> ability to execute may be a negative.  But, I definitely want to see the
> new players show the ability to execute.
> ---
> Ken C. Moellman, Jr.
> Libertarian National Committee
> Region 3 Alternate
>
>
> On 2017-12-10 10:32, Sam Goldstein wrote:
>
> *No funds are to be distributed to state parties without verifiable
> evidence of that state having achieved it's planned contribution.
> --
> Sam Goldstein
> Libertarian National Committee
> 317-850-0726 <(317)%20850-0726> Cell
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20171210/5aa98d87/attachment-0002.html>