[Lnc-business] LNC Emails for Sub Committee Members

[Elizabeth Van Horn]

Caryn Ann, the idea of having an LP-email that's attached to a committee
is really good.  It creates a fixed point of contact, gives the exchange
the proper official LP business gravitas, and as you mentioned,
eliminates the changing members situation.  I like it. 

~Elizabeth Van Horn

On 2017-12-21 22:22, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:

> For the HPC we have set up lpedia at lp.org so it could be a permanent contact and not dependent on changing committee members 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:39 PM Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote: 
> 
> Daniel Hayes's idea is good.  Sean O'Toole's idea is also good. 
> 
> Some of the LP committees interact with people, businesses, and media, outside of the internal LP circle.  Also, some of the committees interact with state affiliates in the capacity of official business, and that may warrant an official LP-email.  Both of the committees that Daniel Hayes chairs probably classify for having LP-emails.  (Affiliate Support Committee & Convention Oversight Committee)
> 
> Another committee that has, and may in the future, interact with organizations or media outside the LP is the Historic committee. (Historical Preservation Committee)  
> 
> The Candidate Support Committee may also be a committee that would be well served with it's members having an LP-email. 
> 
> To recap:  I can see reasons for the following committees to have access to an LP-email:
> 
> Affiliate Support Committee
> Convention Oversight Committee)
> Historical Preservation Committee
> Candidate Support Committee
> 
> Possibly, the Ballot Access Committee too.  If they're involved with contracting to outside people and/or groups. 
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> Chair-LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> http://www.lpcaucus.org/ 
> 
> On 2017-12-20 20:37, Sean O'Toole wrote: 
> Hi Daniel, 
> 
> We have the capacity to handle this but before I go ahead and do it, I'd like to have some sort of policy in place as to who should and should not have an official address. With the input of the LNC and staff, I'd be happy to put a policy together on behalf of the IT Committee as it probably isn't something that needs to rise to the level of an LNC decision. 
> 
> Sean 
> -- 
> Sean O'Toole 
> Libertarian National Committee 
> sean.otoole at lp.org 
> (816) 739-2737 
> On December 20, 2017 at 6:18:24 PM, Daniel Hayes (daniel.hayes at lp.org) wrote: 
> 
> All,
> 
> It's something I have been pondering and one of my committee members asked about today, that being having an official LP address assigned to them. If they are doing work on the part of the Party it would make some sense for them to have that more official email to use. It also might smooth things out with our lists in some cases.
> 
> What are your opinions on this?
> 
> Daniel Hayes
> LNC At Large Member
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business 
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
 _______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business 
_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20171221/60929756/attachment-0002.html>