[Lnc-business] Note about our electronic meeting

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

Oh I know.  This is an informal question in order to learn.

Without being binding - and even if raised then no result would be changed
- does anyone have any thoughts?  If I’m mistaken can someone explain to me?

This is simply an effort to further master RONR not to start a controversy
or rehash a settled vote.


On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:11 AM Nicholas Sarwark <chair at lp.org> wrote:

> Points of order need to be made at the time.
>
> We are no longer at the time.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
> <carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
> >    I think we made an error.  It doesn't affect the outcome but I have
> >    seen members comment on this (and big surprise, there are a vocal few
> >    who are seeing a conspiracy in it) but I don't think Arvin should have
> >    been allowed to vote on the censure motion.
> >    Our Bylaws supersede RONR on suspension (and I think our Bylaws are
> >    flawed there but it is what it is) but do not supersede RONR on
> >    censure.
> >    Thus I think it was in order for Arvin to vote on suspension but not
> in
> >    order for him to vote on censure.
> >    Thoughts?
> >    --
> >    In Liberty,
> >    Caryn Ann Harlos
> >    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
> >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
> >    - [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> >    Communications Director, [2]Libertarian Party of Colorado
> >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >    We defend your rights
> >    And oppose the use of force
> >    Taxation is theft
> >
> > References
> >
> >    1. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >    2. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
   Oh I know.  This is an informal question in order to learn.
   Without being binding - and even if raised then no result would be
   changed - does anyone have any thoughts?  If I’m mistaken can someone
   explain to me?
   This is simply an effort to further master RONR not to start a
   controversy or rehash a settled vote.
   On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:11 AM Nicholas Sarwark <[1]chair at lp.org>
   wrote:

     Points of order need to be made at the time.
     We are no longer at the time.
     -Nick
     On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
     <[2]carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
     >    I think we made an error.  It doesn't affect the outcome but I
     have
     >    seen members comment on this (and big surprise, there are a
     vocal few
     >    who are seeing a conspiracy in it) but I don't think Arvin
     should have
     >    been allowed to vote on the censure motion.
     >    Our Bylaws supersede RONR on suspension (and I think our Bylaws
     are
     >    flawed there but it is what it is) but do not supersede RONR on
     >    censure.
     >    Thus I think it was in order for Arvin to vote on suspension
     but not in
     >    order for him to vote on censure.
     >    Thoughts?
     >    --
     >    In Liberty,
     >    Caryn Ann Harlos
     >    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
     (Alaska,
     >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
     Washington)
     >    - [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
     >    Communications Director, [2]Libertarian Party of Colorado
     >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
     >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >    We defend your rights
     >    And oppose the use of force
     >    Taxation is theft
     >
     > References
     >
     >    1. mailto:[3]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >    2. [4]http://www.lpcolorado.org/

References

   1. mailto:chair at lp.org
   2. mailto:carynannharlos at gmail.com
   3. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
   4. http://www.lpcolorado.org/