[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC
john.phillips at lp.org
john.phillips at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 20:14:41 EDT 2018
Ladies! Please take this disagreement off list. It is unproductive at best.
John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
Cell 217-412-5973
------ Original message------From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-businessDate: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 7:09 PMTo: erin.adams at lp.org;Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn;lnc-business at hq.lp.org;Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC
Nonsense. In your mind, but not mine. My intent matters.
Believe me, I have no problem stating my mind. IF I want to say, "move
on", I'll bloody well write that.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
On 2018-07-11 20:02, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
> Elizabeth,
> The implication is the same. Regardless, you and I will disagree on
> this, Thats fine.
>
>
>
> On 2018-07-11 18:50, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>> Erin, I never told you to more on. Nor, did I "insist", that you do.
>> What are you talking about? I suggested this:
>>
>> "If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
>> sense."
>>
>> Please go back and reread what I wrote. I don't appreciate you making
>> up stuff that I never wrote. Sheesh, it's all right here in writing.
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>>
>> On 2018-07-11 19:43, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>> I am glad we can agree on something. Just as you will continue to
>>> hold
>>> your beliefs and stance, I will do the same. The difference being
>>> that
>>> I am not telling you to move on even tho you insist that I do. I am
>>> happy we have found agreement
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018-07-11 18:38, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>> No one is "diminishing" your stance. I also stated my opinion.
>>>> Nor,
>>>> am I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations being
>>>> tossed around on this list.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that's my opinion. Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has
>>>> made
>>>> about people being "silenced' is unwarranted. (Nor, am I the only
>>>> to
>>>> think this.)
>>>>
>>>> You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-07-11 19:25, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>>>> Elizabeth,
>>>>> It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person
>>>>> "feeling"
>>>>> this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my
>>>>> stance
>>>>> nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is my
>>>>> OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS my
>>>>> belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>>>> Erin, what others? I haven't seen anyone on this list try to
>>>>>> silence
>>>>>> others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting. Others
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> done the same. If anything there's been pressure put on those who
>>>>>> want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
>>>>>> constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> gone after to change their vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region,
>>>>>> but I
>>>>>> can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the
>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>> vote. For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, and
>>>>>> have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have us
>>>>>> accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>>>>>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>>>>>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:50, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>> Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
>>>>>>> YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems
>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>> Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> doing that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ms. Adams,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
>>>>>>>> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than
>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
>>>>>>>> actually being silenced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering
>>>>>>>> questions
>>>>>>>> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments. Your
>>>>>>>> response
>>>>>>>> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
>>>>>>>> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then
>>>>>>>> complained
>>>>>>>> about the tone of the debate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of
>>>>>>>> you. On
>>>>>>>> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the
>>>>>>>> minority
>>>>>>>> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the
>>>>>>>> losing
>>>>>>>> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we
>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or
>>>>>>>> martyrdom. The
>>>>>>>> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in
>>>>>>>> cages,
>>>>>>>> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do
>>>>>>>> also,
>>>>>>>> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true
>>>>>>>>> that "
>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two
>>>>>>>>> years." and
>>>>>>>>> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some
>>>>>>>>> in an
>>>>>>>>> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up
>>>>>>>>> folks,
>>>>>>>>> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be
>>>>>>>>> dismissed
>>>>>>>>> and silenced.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went
>>>>>>>>>> awry.
>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two
>>>>>>>>>> years. We
>>>>>>>>>> will have a fix in place before the
>>>>>>>>>> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the
>>>>>>>>>> delegates and
>>>>>>>>>> made effective immediately.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot
>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>> which is supposed to just be for recording
>>>>>>>>>> votes on the motion.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my goodness. I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>>>>>>>>>>> I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am
>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to NOT
>>>>>>>>>>> yell it from the rooftops? What Party am I in again?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Agreed, to a point. At some time, preaching to the
>>>>>>>>>>> choir becomes
>>>>>>>>>>> counter productive. As noted earlier, we are all aware
>>>>>>>>>>> that it
>>>>>>>>>>> sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that
>>>>>>>>>>> will make
>>>>>>>>>>> everyone happy immediately. We all want to fix it, and
>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>> yesterday. I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points,
>>>>>>>>>>> and yours.
>>>>>>>>>>> Bring it up once a week. Absolutely. Don't bring it up
>>>>>>>>>>> 5 times a
>>>>>>>>>>> day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments
>>>>>>>>>>> takes away
>>>>>>>>>>> time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party
>>>>>>>>>>> in other
>>>>>>>>>>> ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up
>>>>>>>>>>> continually
>>>>>>>>>>> on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.
>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move
>>>>>>>>>>> on and FIX IT.
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let
>>>>>>>>>>> this crap
>>>>>>>>>>> happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>> John Phillips
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>> Cell 217-412-5973
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing
>>>>>>>>>>> to be quiet
>>>>>>>>>>> about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once
>>>>>>>>>>> a week until
>>>>>>>>>>> solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening
>>>>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>> Craig Bowden
>>>>>>>>>>> Region 1 Alternate
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I respectfully decline.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>>> Just shut up about this already!
>>>>>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> PS: Before this vote ends, I am going to put
>>>>>>>>>>> something together
>>>>>>>>>>> to try
>>>>>>>>>>> to convince you that this is actually one of the
>>>>>>>>>>> worst ways to
>>>>>>>>>>> solve.
>>>>>>>>>>> My first issue - that of steering the delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> down that road
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any
>>>>>>>>>>> way that we
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> ever do. If it were up to me, I would punt it all
>>>>>>>>>>> back to the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates.
>>>>>>>>>>> The second issue - of how to handle this situation
>>>>>>>>>>> with the JC
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>> we are trying to solve it now and I think we are
>>>>>>>>>>> solving it
>>>>>>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>>>>>> ethically and procedurally.
>>>>>>>>>>> And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR
>>>>>>>>>>> come into
>>>>>>>>>>> conflict.
>>>>>>>>>>> Rules are tools. Just because a rule allows
>>>>>>>>>>> something doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> mean
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> is right, and this is probably why the first issue
>>>>>>>>>>> is sticking
>>>>>>>>>>> in my
>>>>>>>>>>> craw so badly. It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to
>>>>>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>>>>>> rules of
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> election mid-way. There is a huge difference
>>>>>>>>>>> between majority
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it
>>>>>>>>>>> effects the
>>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> campaign. We treated them and their efforts as
>>>>>>>>>>> pawns, and it
>>>>>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>>>>>> I know some of you are thinking, just shut up
>>>>>>>>>>> about this
>>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is
>>>>>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>>>>>> like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last
>>>>>>>>>>> term.
>>>>>>>>>>> The only way we are going to learn as an
>>>>>>>>>>> organization is if
>>>>>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> bit painful. And in so doing we will model
>>>>>>>>>>> over-the-top
>>>>>>>>>>> integrity
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> our members rather than political expediency.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately
>>>>>>>>>>> do get the
>>>>>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't even vote in the two races because we put
>>>>>>>>>>> them off so
>>>>>>>>>>> long.
>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>> the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast
>>>>>>>>>>> votes in the
>>>>>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by
>>>>>>>>>>> those who
>>>>>>>>>>> stay and
>>>>>>>>>>> vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>>> combination of
>>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>>> methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling
>>>>>>>>>>> left us in a
>>>>>>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>>>> place.===
>>>>>>>>>>> You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now
>>>>>>>>>>> are surprised
>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>>>>> ran over?
>>>>>>>>>>> But it is more than that. The delegates were led
>>>>>>>>>>> to make a
>>>>>>>>>>> decision
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> a certain direction. There WERE other options.
>>>>>>>>>>> Whether or
>>>>>>>>>>> not one
>>>>>>>>>>> agrees with the voting methodology, it is the
>>>>>>>>>>> methodology and
>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>> intent was to use approval voting to show approval
>>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>>> turned it
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> its head. Why weren't the delegates given other
>>>>>>>>>>> options?
>>>>>>>>>>> ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the
>>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all
>>>>>>>>>>> Party
>>>>>>>>>>> members or
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>> filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in
>>>>>>>>>>> motion - are
>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>> violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>>>>>>>>>>> Are they all? I don't think so. And I do think my
>>>>>>>>>>> very real
>>>>>>>>>>> complaint
>>>>>>>>>>> of how the delegates were steered in a certain
>>>>>>>>>>> direction is
>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>>>>>>>>>>> ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread
>>>>>>>>>>> of legality:
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC.
>>>>>>>>>>> There's also no
>>>>>>>>>>> doubt in
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> mind that had they been asked they would have done
>>>>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>> JC.
>>>>>>>>>>> A room of several hundred Libertarians were not
>>>>>>>>>>> coerced into
>>>>>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> - they went with what Nick suggested because
>>>>>>>>>>> that's what they
>>>>>>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> do. He just told them how.===
>>>>>>>>>>> And that is where the dispute is. Most of the
>>>>>>>>>>> people there
>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>> (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson
>>>>>>>>>>> of the LNC
>>>>>>>>>>> and this
>>>>>>>>>>> isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>>> were presented with two choices in which they were
>>>>>>>>>>> led down a
>>>>>>>>>>> particular path. You are an attorney Joe, you
>>>>>>>>>>> know exactly
>>>>>>>>>>> what I
>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>> getting at here.
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you really think that if they were offered a
>>>>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>>>> rising vote
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> the spot to choose between options they would not
>>>>>>>>>>> have taken
>>>>>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any
>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> options. It
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't immediately occur to me and I am
>>>>>>>>>>> well-versed in this
>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> stinks. If a government acted this way we would
>>>>>>>>>>> be all
>>>>>>>>>>> lathered up.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe
>>>>>>>>>>> Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>> <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately
>>>>>>>>>>> do get the
>>>>>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates didn't even vote in the two races
>>>>>>>>>>> because we put
>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>> so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't cast
>>>>>>>>>>> votes in
>>>>>>>>>>> the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules -
>>>>>>>>>>> elections are
>>>>>>>>>>> won by
>>>>>>>>>>> those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make
>>>>>>>>>>> it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>>> combination of voting methodology, tabulation
>>>>>>>>>>> method, and
>>>>>>>>>>> scheduling
>>>>>>>>>>> left us in a bad place.
>>>>>>>>>>> All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is
>>>>>>>>>>> the most
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of
>>>>>>>>>>> all Party
>>>>>>>>>>> members
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>> us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs
>>>>>>>>>>> in motion -
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>> more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>>>>>>>>>>> I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue
>>>>>>>>>>> that every JC
>>>>>>>>>>> candidate was disapproved and that it should sit
>>>>>>>>>>> empty until
>>>>>>>>>>> 2022.
>>>>>>>>>>> The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread
>>>>>>>>>>> of legality:
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>>>>>> and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC.
>>>>>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>> doubt in my mind that had they been asked they
>>>>>>>>>>> would have
>>>>>>>>>>> done the
>>>>>>>>>>> same for the JC. A room of several hundred
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarians were
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> coerced into doing that - they went with what
>>>>>>>>>>> Nick suggested
>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>> that's what they wanted to do. He just told them
>>>>>>>>>>> how. They
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>>> want the LNC fighting over who would fill the
>>>>>>>>>>> seats if they
>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>> left vacant.
>>>>>>>>>>> I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want
>>>>>>>>>>> to write
>>>>>>>>>>> this to
>>>>>>>>>>> emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or
>>>>>>>>>>> sweeping
>>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>>> blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how
>>>>>>>>>>> we do
>>>>>>>>>>> elections
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> be a big priority for many of us.
>>>>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Suspension of the rules has to be specific and
>>>>>>>>>>> there is no
>>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that we used the number 5 over and
>>>>>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>>>>>>> This is taking things to an even deeper level
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> improper. I
>>>>>>>>>>> object to
>>>>>>>>>>> the whole at-Large process- I don’t think the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> made an
>>>>>>>>>>> independent choice and now to just infer this
>>>>>>>>>>> upon that
>>>>>>>>>>> is two
>>>>>>>>>>> bridges
>>>>>>>>>>> too far.
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of
>>>>>>>>>>> sweeping it
>>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>> the rug.
>>>>>>>>>>> It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole
>>>>>>>>>>> situation
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> taken.
>>>>>>>>>>> There are people looking at us and seeing
>>>>>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> government we wish to reform.
>>>>>>>>>>> There was a controversial election and at
>>>>>>>>>>> least one state
>>>>>>>>>>> chair
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> candidate has been asking for the state by
>>>>>>>>>>> state rallies
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>> frame given him.
>>>>>>>>>>> The whole thing was an affront to people
>>>>>>>>>>> expecting an
>>>>>>>>>>> entirely
>>>>>>>>>>> different thing when they ran. I will not be
>>>>>>>>>>> sanguine
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> This point did come up immediately after
>>>>>>>>>>> adjournment,
>>>>>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> still at the mic. I don't recall who
>>>>>>>>>>> brought it up, but
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> statement
>>>>>>>>>>> was made that it would follow the same
>>>>>>>>>>> procedure as
>>>>>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> point, since we were no longer in session.
>>>>>>>>>>> No one raised the question prior to that.
>>>>>>>>>>> Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>> Region 7 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann
>>>>>>>>>>> Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Joshua they were not given a choice on
>>>>>>>>>>> this. The
>>>>>>>>>>> JC
>>>>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>>>> came
>>>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I vote yes. Given that the delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> were given the
>>>>>>>>>>> choice
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> convention
>>>>>>>>>>> just a few short days ago, I believe we
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> respect
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> decision.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Joshua D. Smith
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > We have an electronic mail ballot.
>>>>>>>>>>> Votes are due
>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> LNC-Business
>>>>>>>>>>> > list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm
>>>>>>>>>>> Pacific
>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Sponsors:
>>>>>>>>>>> > Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan,
>>>>>>>>>>> Merced, Van
>>>>>>>>>>> Horn
>>>>>>>>>>> Motion:
>>>>>>>>>>> Move
>>>>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>>>>> > the Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledge
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> election of
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> > following to the Judicial Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> for a
>>>>>>>>>>> four-year
>>>>>>>>>>> term:
>>>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>>>> > Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl
>>>>>>>>>>> Perry, Ruth
>>>>>>>>>>> Bennett,
>>>>>>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>>>>>>> Neale,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Jim
>>>>>>>>>>> > Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You
>>>>>>>>>>> can keep track
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary's
>>>>>>>>>>> > manual tally of votes here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>> > In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> > Region 1 Representative,
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> (Alaska,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii,
>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas, Montana,
>>>>>>>>>>> Utah,
>>>>>>>>>>> Wyoming,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Washington)
>>>>>>>>>>> > - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> > Communications Director,
>>>>>>>>>>> [3]Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>> Party of
>>>>>>>>>>> Colorado
>>>>>>>>>>> > Chair, LP Historical
>>>>>>>>>>> Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> > A haiku to the Statement of
>>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> > We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> > And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> > Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > References
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > 1.
>>>>>>>>>>> [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co
>>>>>>>>>>> m/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> > 2.
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> > 3.
>>>>>>>>>>> [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>>>>>>>>>>> ado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of
>>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>>>>>> [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>>>>> [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5.
>>>>>>>>>>> [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.
>>>>>>>>>>> [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 5.
>>>>>>>>>>> [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 8.
>>>>>>>>>>> [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 9.
>>>>>>>>>>> [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>> LNC Member (At-Large)
>>>>>>>>>>> [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 27.
>>>>>>>>>>> [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 25. [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 52.
>>>>>>>>>>> [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
-------------- next part --------------
Ladies! Please take this disagreement off list. It is unproductive at
best.
John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
Cell [1]217-412-5973
------ Original message------
From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 7:09 PM
To: [2]erin.adams at lp.org;
Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[3];lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION
OF JC
Nonsense. In your mind, but not mine. My intent matters.
Believe me, I have no problem stating my mind. IF I want to say, "move
on", I'll bloody well write that.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
On [4]2018-07-11 20:02,[5] erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
> Elizabeth,
> The implication is the same. Regardless, you and I will disagree on
> this, Thats fine.
>
>
>
> On [6]2018-07-11 18:50, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>> Erin, I never told you to more on. Nor, did I "insist", that you do.
>> What are you talking about? I suggested this:
>>
>> "If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
>> sense."
>>
>> Please go back and reread what I wrote. I don't appreciate you making
>> up stuff that I never wrote. Sheesh, it's all right here in writing.
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>>
>> On [7]2018-07-11 19:43,[8] erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>> I am glad we can agree on something. Just as you will continue to
>>> hold
>>> your beliefs and stance, I will do the same. The difference being
>>> that
>>> I am not telling you to move on even tho you insist that I do. I am
>>> happy we have found agreement
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On [9]2018-07-11 18:38, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>> No one is "diminishing" your stance. I also stated my opinion.
>>>> Nor,
>>>> am I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations being
>>>> tossed around on this list.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that's my opinion. Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has
>>>> made
>>>> about people being "silenced' is unwarranted. (Nor, am I the only
>>>> to
>>>> think this.)
>>>>
>>>> You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On [10]2018-07-11 19:25,[11] erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>>>> Elizabeth,
>>>>> It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person
>>>>> "feeling"
>>>>> this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my
>>>>> stance
>>>>> nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is my
>>>>> OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS my
>>>>> belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On [12]2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>>>> Erin, what others? I haven't seen anyone on this list try to
>>>>>> silence
>>>>>> others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting. Others
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> done the same. If anything there's been pressure put on those who
>>>>>> want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
>>>>>> constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> gone after to change their vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region,
>>>>>> but I
>>>>>> can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the
>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>> vote. For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, and
>>>>>> have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have us
>>>>>> accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>>>>>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>>>>>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes
>>>>>> no
>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On [13]2018-07-11 10:50, [14]erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>> Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
>>>>>>> YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems
>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>> Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO intention
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> doing that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On [15]2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ms. Adams,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. Ms.
>>>>>>>> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than
>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one is
>>>>>>>> actually being silenced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering
>>>>>>>> questions
>>>>>>>> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments. Your
>>>>>>>> response
>>>>>>>> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
>>>>>>>> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then
>>>>>>>> complained
>>>>>>>> about the tone of the debate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of
>>>>>>>> you. On
>>>>>>>> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the
>>>>>>>> minority
>>>>>>>> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the
>>>>>>>> losing
>>>>>>>> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we
>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or
>>>>>>>> martyrdom. The
>>>>>>>> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in
>>>>>>>> cages,
>>>>>>>> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do
>>>>>>>> also,
>>>>>>>> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On [16]2018-07-11 10:24, [17]erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true
>>>>>>>>> that "
>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two
>>>>>>>>> years." and
>>>>>>>>> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some
>>>>>>>>> in an
>>>>>>>>> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up
>>>>>>>>> folks,
>>>>>>>>> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be
>>>>>>>>> dismissed
>>>>>>>>> and silenced.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On [18]2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went
>>>>>>>>>> awry.
>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two
>>>>>>>>>> years. We
>>>>>>>>>> will have a fix in place before the
>>>>>>>>>> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the
>>>>>>>>>> delegates and
>>>>>>>>>> made effective immediately.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot
>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>> which is supposed to just be for recording
>>>>>>>>>> votes on the motion.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>> [19]317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On [20]2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my goodness. I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>>>>>>>>>>> I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am
>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to NOT
>>>>>>>>>>> yell it from the rooftops? What Party am I in again?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1[21]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Agreed, to a point. At some time, preaching to the
>>>>>>>>>>> choir becomes
>>>>>>>>>>> counter productive. As noted earlier, we are all aware
>>>>>>>>>>> that it
>>>>>>>>>>> sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that
>>>>>>>>>>> will make
>>>>>>>>>>> everyone happy immediately. We all want to fix it, and
>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>> yesterday. I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points,
>>>>>>>>>>> and yours.
>>>>>>>>>>> Bring it up once a week. Absolutely. Don't bring it up
>>>>>>>>>>> 5 times a
>>>>>>>>>>> day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments
>>>>>>>>>>> takes away
>>>>>>>>>>> time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party
>>>>>>>>>>> in other
>>>>>>>>>>> ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up
>>>>>>>>>>> continually
>>>>>>>>>>> on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive.
>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move
>>>>>>>>>>> on and FIX IT.
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let
>>>>>>>>>>> this crap
>>>>>>>>>>> happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>> John Phillips
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>> Cell [22]217-412-5973
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing
>>>>>>>>>>> to be quiet
>>>>>>>>>>> about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once
>>>>>>>>>>> a week until
>>>>>>>>>>> solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening
>>>>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>> Craig Bowden
>>>>>>>>>>> Region 1 Alternate
>>>>>>>>>>> On [23]2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I respectfully decline.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][2[24]]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>>> Just shut up about this already!
>>>>>>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> [25]317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>>> On [26]2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> PS: Before this vote ends, I am going to put
>>>>>>>>>>> something together
>>>>>>>>>>> to try
>>>>>>>>>>> to convince you that this is actually one of the
>>>>>>>>>>> worst ways to
>>>>>>>>>>> solve.
>>>>>>>>>>> My first issue - that of steering the delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> down that road
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any
>>>>>>>>>>> way that we
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> ever do. If it were up to me, I would punt it all
>>>>>>>>>>> back to the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates.
>>>>>>>>>>> The second issue - of how to handle this situation
>>>>>>>>>>> with the JC
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>>>> we are trying to solve it now and I think we are
>>>>>>>>>>> solving it
>>>>>>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>>>>>> ethically and procedurally.
>>>>>>>>>>> And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR
>>>>>>>>>>> come into
>>>>>>>>>>> conflict.
>>>>>>>>>>> Rules are tools. Just because a rule allows
>>>>>>>>>>> something doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> mean
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> is right, and this is probably why the first issue
>>>>>>>>>>> is sticking
>>>>>>>>>>> in my
>>>>>>>>>>> craw so badly. It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to
>>>>>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>>>>>> rules of
>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> election mid-way. There is a huge difference
>>>>>>>>>>> between majority
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it
>>>>>>>>>>> effects the
>>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> campaign. We treated them and their efforts as
>>>>>>>>>>> pawns, and it
>>>>>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>>>>>> right.
>>>>>>>>>>> I know some of you are thinking, just shut up
>>>>>>>>>>> about this
>>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is
>>>>>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>>>>>> like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last
>>>>>>>>>>> term.
>>>>>>>>>>> The only way we are going to learn as an
>>>>>>>>>>> organization is if
>>>>>>>>>>> this is
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> bit painful. And in so doing we will model
>>>>>>>>>>> over-the-top
>>>>>>>>>>> integrity
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> our members rather than political expediency.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][2][3[27]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately
>>>>>>>>>>> do get the
>>>>>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't even vote in the two races because we put
>>>>>>>>>>> them off so
>>>>>>>>>>> long.
>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>> the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast
>>>>>>>>>>> votes in the
>>>>>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by
>>>>>>>>>>> those who
>>>>>>>>>>> stay and
>>>>>>>>>>> vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>>> combination of
>>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>>> methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling
>>>>>>>>>>> left us in a
>>>>>>>>>>> bad
>>>>>>>>>>> place.===
>>>>>>>>>>> You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now
>>>>>>>>>>> are surprised
>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>>>>> ran over?
>>>>>>>>>>> But it is more than that. The delegates were led
>>>>>>>>>>> to make a
>>>>>>>>>>> decision
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> a certain direction. There WERE other options.
>>>>>>>>>>> Whether or
>>>>>>>>>>> not one
>>>>>>>>>>> agrees with the voting methodology, it is the
>>>>>>>>>>> methodology and
>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>> intent was to use approval voting to show approval
>>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>>> turned it
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> its head. Why weren't the delegates given other
>>>>>>>>>>> options?
>>>>>>>>>>> ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the
>>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all
>>>>>>>>>>> Party
>>>>>>>>>>> members or
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>> filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in
>>>>>>>>>>> motion - are
>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>> violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>>>>>>>>>>> Are they all? I don't think so. And I do think my
>>>>>>>>>>> very real
>>>>>>>>>>> complaint
>>>>>>>>>>> of how the delegates were steered in a certain
>>>>>>>>>>> direction is
>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>>>>>>>>>>> ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread
>>>>>>>>>>> of legality:
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC.
>>>>>>>>>>> There's also no
>>>>>>>>>>> doubt in
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> mind that had they been asked they would have done
>>>>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>> JC.
>>>>>>>>>>> A room of several hundred Libertarians were not
>>>>>>>>>>> coerced into
>>>>>>>>>>> doing
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> - they went with what Nick suggested because
>>>>>>>>>>> that's what they
>>>>>>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> do. He just told them how.===
>>>>>>>>>>> And that is where the dispute is. Most of the
>>>>>>>>>>> people there
>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>> (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson
>>>>>>>>>>> of the LNC
>>>>>>>>>>> and this
>>>>>>>>>>> isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what
>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>> wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>>> were presented with two choices in which they were
>>>>>>>>>>> led down a
>>>>>>>>>>> particular path. You are an attorney Joe, you
>>>>>>>>>>> know exactly
>>>>>>>>>>> what I
>>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>>> getting at here.
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you really think that if they were offered a
>>>>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>>>> rising vote
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> the spot to choose between options they would not
>>>>>>>>>>> have taken
>>>>>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any
>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> options. It
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't immediately occur to me and I am
>>>>>>>>>>> well-versed in this
>>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> stinks. If a government acted this way we would
>>>>>>>>>>> be all
>>>>>>>>>>> lathered up.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe
>>>>>>>>>>> Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>> <[2][3][4[28]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately
>>>>>>>>>>> do get the
>>>>>>>>>>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that
>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates didn't even vote in the two races
>>>>>>>>>>> because we put
>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>> so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't cast
>>>>>>>>>>> votes in
>>>>>>>>>>> the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules -
>>>>>>>>>>> elections are
>>>>>>>>>>> won by
>>>>>>>>>>> those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make
>>>>>>>>>>> it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>>> combination of voting methodology, tabulation
>>>>>>>>>>> method, and
>>>>>>>>>>> scheduling
>>>>>>>>>>> left us in a bad place.
>>>>>>>>>>> All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>>>>>>>>>>> complain.
>>>>>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is
>>>>>>>>>>> the most
>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of
>>>>>>>>>>> all Party
>>>>>>>>>>> members
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>> us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs
>>>>>>>>>>> in motion -
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>> more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>>>>>>>>>>> I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue
>>>>>>>>>>> that every JC
>>>>>>>>>>> candidate was disapproved and that it should sit
>>>>>>>>>>> empty until
>>>>>>>>>>> 2022.
>>>>>>>>>>> The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread
>>>>>>>>>>> of legality:
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top
>>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>>>>>> and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC.
>>>>>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>> doubt in my mind that had they been asked they
>>>>>>>>>>> would have
>>>>>>>>>>> done the
>>>>>>>>>>> same for the JC. A room of several hundred
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarians were
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> coerced into doing that - they went with what
>>>>>>>>>>> Nick suggested
>>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>>> that's what they wanted to do. He just told them
>>>>>>>>>>> how. They
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>>> want the LNC fighting over who would fill the
>>>>>>>>>>> seats if they
>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>> left vacant.
>>>>>>>>>>> I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want
>>>>>>>>>>> to write
>>>>>>>>>>> this to
>>>>>>>>>>> emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or
>>>>>>>>>>> sweeping
>>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>>> blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how
>>>>>>>>>>> we do
>>>>>>>>>>> elections
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> be a big priority for many of us.
>>>>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>>>> On [29]2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Suspension of the rules has to be specific and
>>>>>>>>>>> there is no
>>>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>>>> the fact that we used the number 5 over and
>>>>>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>>>>>>> This is taking things to an even deeper level
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> improper. I
>>>>>>>>>>> object to
>>>>>>>>>>> the whole at-Large process- I don’t think the
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> made an
>>>>>>>>>>> independent choice and now to just infer this
>>>>>>>>>>> upon that
>>>>>>>>>>> is two
>>>>>>>>>>> bridges
>>>>>>>>>>> too far.
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of
>>>>>>>>>>> sweeping it
>>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>> the rug.
>>>>>>>>>>> It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole
>>>>>>>>>>> situation
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> taken.
>>>>>>>>>>> There are people looking at us and seeing
>>>>>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> government we wish to reform.
>>>>>>>>>>> There was a controversial election and at
>>>>>>>>>>> least one state
>>>>>>>>>>> chair
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> candidate has been asking for the state by
>>>>>>>>>>> state rallies
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>> frame given him.
>>>>>>>>>>> The whole thing was an affront to people
>>>>>>>>>>> expecting an
>>>>>>>>>>> entirely
>>>>>>>>>>> different thing when they ran. I will not be
>>>>>>>>>>> sanguine
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][3][4][5[30]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> This point did come up immediately after
>>>>>>>>>>> adjournment,
>>>>>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> still at the mic. I don't recall who
>>>>>>>>>>> brought it up, but
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> statement
>>>>>>>>>>> was made that it would follow the same
>>>>>>>>>>> procedure as
>>>>>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> point, since we were no longer in session.
>>>>>>>>>>> No one raised the question prior to that.
>>>>>>>>>>> Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>> Region 7 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann
>>>>>>>>>>> Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> <[2][4][5][6[31]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Joshua they were not given a choice on
>>>>>>>>>>> this. The
>>>>>>>>>>> JC
>>>>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>>>> came
>>>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> <[1][3][5][6][7[32]]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I vote yes. Given that the delegates
>>>>>>>>>>> were given the
>>>>>>>>>>> choice
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> convention
>>>>>>>>>>> just a few short days ago, I believe we
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> respect
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> decision.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Joshua D. Smith
>>>>>>>>>>> On [33]2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> > We have an electronic mail ballot.
>>>>>>>>>>> Votes are due
>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> LNC-Business
>>>>>>>>>>> > list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm
>>>>>>>>>>> Pacific
>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Sponsors:
>>>>>>>>>>> > Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan,
>>>>>>>>>>> Merced, Van
>>>>>>>>>>> Horn
>>>>>>>>>>> Motion:
>>>>>>>>>>> Move
>>>>>>>>>>> > that
>>>>>>>>>>> > the Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledge
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> election of
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> > following to the Judicial Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> for a
>>>>>>>>>>> four-year
>>>>>>>>>>> term:
>>>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>>>> > Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl
>>>>>>>>>>> Perry, Ruth
>>>>>>>>>>> Bennett,
>>>>>>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>>>>>>> Neale,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Jim
>>>>>>>>>>> > Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You
>>>>>>>>>>> can keep track
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary's
>>>>>>>>>>> > manual tally of votes here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1][2][4][6][7][8][34]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>> > In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> > Region 1 Representative,
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> (Alaska,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii,
>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas, Montana,
>>>>>>>>>>> Utah,
>>>>>>>>>>> Wyoming,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Washington)
>>>>>>>>>>> > - [2][35]Caryn.Ann.[36] Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> > Communications Director,
>>>>>>>>>>> [3]Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>> Party of
>>>>>>>>>>> Colorado
>>>>>>>>>>> > Chair, LP Historical
>>>>>>>>>>> Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> > A haiku to the Statement of
>>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> > We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> > And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> > Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > References
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > 1.
>>>>>>>>>>> [3][5][7][8][9][37]https://tinyurl.co
>>>>>>>>>>> m/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> > 2.
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[4[38]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> > 3.
>>>>>>>>>>> [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>>>>>>>>>>> [39]ado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [6][40]Caryn.Ann.[41] Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>>[42] Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>> [43] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of
>>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[7][9][10][11[44]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>>>>>> [8][10][11][12][45]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>>>>> [9][11][12][13][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[10[47]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5.
>>>>>>>>>>> [11][12][13][14][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[12[49]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [13][50]Caryn.Ann.[51] Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>>[52] Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> [53] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[13][14][15[54]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[14][15][16[55]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[15][16][17[56]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.
>>>>>>>>>>> [16][17][18][57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 5.
>>>>>>>>>>> [17][18][19][58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. [18][19][20][59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. mailto:[19][20][21[60]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 8.
>>>>>>>>>>> [20][21][22][61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 9.
>>>>>>>>>>> [21][22][23][62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[22[63]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. [23][23][24][64]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. mailto:[24[65]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[25[66]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>> LNC Member (At-Large)
>>>>>>>>>>> [26][24][25[67]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [27][25][26][68]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [28][69]Caryn.Ann.[70] Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>>[71] Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>>[72] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [29][73]Caryn.Ann.[74] Harlos at LP.org or
>>>>>>>>>>>[75] Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>>[76] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[26][27[77]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[27][28[78]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[28][29[79]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[29][30[80]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[30][31[81]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. [31][32][82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. [32][33][83]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. [33][34][84]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. mailto:[34][35[85]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. [35][36][86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. [36][37][87]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. [37][38][88]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. mailto:[38][39[89]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[39][40[90]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[40][41[91]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 16. [41][42][92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 17. [42][43][93]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 18. [43][44][94]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 19. mailto:[44][45[95]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 20. [45][46][96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 21. [46][47][97]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 22. mailto:[47[98]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 23. [48][48][99]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[49[100]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 25. mailto:[50[101]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[51][49[102]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 27.
>>>>>>>>>>> [52][50][103]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[53[104]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[54[105]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [55][106]Caryn.Ann.[107] Harlos at LP.org or[108] Secretary at L
P.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>>[109] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto:[51[110]]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto:[52[111]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto:[53[112]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto:[54[113]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto:[55[114]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto:[56[115]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. [57][116]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. [58][117]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. [59][118]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. mailto:[60[119]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. [61][120]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. [62][121]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. [63][122]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 14. mailto:[64[123]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto:[65[124]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 16. mailto:[66[125]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 17. [67][126]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 18. [68][127]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 19. [69][128]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 20. mailto:[70[129]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 21. [71][130]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 22. [72][131]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 23. [73][132]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 24. mailto:[74[133]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 25. [75][134]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 26. mailto:[76[135]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 27. mailto:[77[136]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto:[78[137]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto:[79[138]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 30. mailto:[80[139]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 31. [81][140]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 32. [82][141]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 33. [83][142]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 34. mailto:[84[143]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 35. [85][144]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 36. [86][145]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 37. [87][146]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 38. mailto:[88[147]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 39. mailto:[89[148]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 40. mailto:[90[149]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 41. [91][150]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 42. [92][151]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 43. [93][152]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 44. mailto:[94[153]]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 45. [95][154]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 46. [96][155]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 47. mailto:[97[156]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 48. [98][157]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 49. mailto:[99[158]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 50. mailto:[100[159]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 51. mailto:[101[160]]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 52.
>>>>>>>>>>> [102][161]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 53. mailto:[103[162]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 54. mailto:[104[163]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 55. mailto:[105[164]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>> - [106][165]Caryn.Ann.[166] Harlos at LP.org or[167] Secretary at LP.or
g.
>>>>>>>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>>[168] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>> We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>> And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. mailto[169]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. mailto[170]:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. mailto[171]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. mailto[172]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. mailto[173]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 6. mailto[174]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 7. mailto[175]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 8. [176]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 9. [177]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 10. [178]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 11. mailto[179]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 12. [180]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 13. [181]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 14. [182]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 15. mailto[183]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 16. mailto[184]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 17. mailto[185]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 18. [186]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 19. [187]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 20. [188]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 21. mailto[189]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 22. [190]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 23. [191]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 24. [192]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 25. mailto[193]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 26. [194]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 27. mailto[195]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 28. mailto[196]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 29. mailto[197]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 30. mailto[198]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 31. mailto[199]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 32. [200]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 33. [201]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 34. [202]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 35. mailto[203]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 36. [204]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 37. [205]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 38. [206]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 39. mailto[207]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 40. mailto[208]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 41. mailto[209]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 42. [210]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 43. [211]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 44. [212]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 45. mailto[213]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 46. [214]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 47. [215]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 48. [216]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 49. mailto[217]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 50. [218]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 51. mailto[219]:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 52. mailto[220]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 53. mailto[221]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 54. mailto[222]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 55. mailto[223]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 56. mailto[224]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 57. [225]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 58. [226]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 59. [227]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 60. mailto[228]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 61. [229]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 62. [230]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 63. [231]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 64. mailto[232]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 65. mailto[233]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 66. mailto[234]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 67. [235]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 68. [236]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 69. [237]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 70. mailto[238]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 71. [239]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 72. [240]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 73. [241]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 74. mailto[242]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 75. [243]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 76. mailto[244]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 77. mailto[245]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 78. mailto[246]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 79. mailto[247]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 80. mailto[248]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 81. [249]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 82. [250]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 83. [251]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 84. mailto[252]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 85. [253]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 86. [254]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 87. [255]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 88. mailto[256]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 89. mailto[257]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 90. mailto[258]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 91. [259]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 92. [260]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 93. [261]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 94. mailto[262]:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 95. [263]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 96. [264]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>> 97. mailto[265]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 98. [266]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 99. mailto[267]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 100. mailto[268]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 101. mailto[269]:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 102. [270]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>> 103. mailto[271]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 104. mailto[272]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 105. mailto[273]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 106. mailto[274]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
References
1. tel:217-412-5973
2. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
3. mailto:;lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. tel:2018-07-11 20
5. mailto: erin.adams at lp.org
6. tel:2018-07-11 18
7. tel:2018-07-11 19
8. mailto: erin.adams at lp.org
9. tel:2018-07-11 18
10. tel:2018-07-11 19
11. mailto: erin.adams at lp.org
12. tel:2018-07-11 13
13. tel:2018-07-11 10
14. http://erin.ad/
15. tel:2018-07-11 09
16. tel:2018-07-11 10
17. http://erin.ad/
18. tel:2018-07-09 20
19. tel:317-850-0726
20. tel:2018-07-09 20
21. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
22. tel:217-412-5973
23. tel:2018-07-09 18
24. mailto:]sam.goldstein at lp.org
25. tel:317-850-0726
26. tel:2018-07-09 18
27. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
28. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
29. tel:2018-07-09 16
30. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
31. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
32. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
33. tel:2018-07-07 22
34. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
35. http://Caryn.An/
36. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
37. https://tinyurl.co/
38. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
39. http://ado.org/
40. http://Caryn.An/
41. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
42. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
43. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
44. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
45. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
47. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
49. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
50. http://Caryn.An/
51. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
52. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
53. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
54. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
55. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
56. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
60. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
63. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
64. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
65. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
66. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
67. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
68. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
69. http://Caryn.An/
70. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
71. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
72. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
73. http://Caryn.An/
74. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
75. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
76. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
77. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
78. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
79. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
80. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
81. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
83. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
84. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
85. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
87. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
88. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
89. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
90. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
91. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
93. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
94. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
95. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
97. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
98. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
99. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
100. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
101. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
102. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
103. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
104. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
105. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
106. http://Caryn.An/
107. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
108. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
109. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
110. mailto:]sam.goldstein at lp.org
111. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
112. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
113. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
114. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
115. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
116. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
117. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
118. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
119. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
120. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
121. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
122. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
123. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
124. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
125. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
126. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
127. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
128. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
129. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
130. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
131. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
132. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
133. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
134. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
135. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
136. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
137. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
138. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
139. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
140. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
141. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
142. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
143. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
144. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
145. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
146. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
147. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
148. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
149. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
150. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
151. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
152. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
153. mailto:]joshua.smith at lp.org
154. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
155. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
156. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
157. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
158. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
159. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
160. mailto:]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
161. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
162. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
163. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
164. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
165. http://Caryn.An/
166. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
167. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
168. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
169. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
170. mailto::sam.goldstein at lp.org
171. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
172. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
173. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
174. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
175. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
176. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
177. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
178. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
179. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
180. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
181. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
182. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
183. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
184. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
185. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
186. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
187. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
188. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
189. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
190. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
191. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
192. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
193. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
194. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
195. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
196. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
197. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
198. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
199. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
200. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
201. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
202. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
203. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
204. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
205. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
206. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
207. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
208. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
209. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
210. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
211. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
212. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
213. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
214. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
215. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
216. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
217. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
218. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
219. mailto::sam.goldstein at lp.org
220. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
221. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
222. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
223. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
224. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
225. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
226. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
227. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
228. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
229. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
230. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
231. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
232. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
233. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
234. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
235. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
236. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
237. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
238. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
239. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
240. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
241. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
242. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
243. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
244. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
245. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
246. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
247. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
248. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
249. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
250. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
251. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
252. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
253. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
254. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
255. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
256. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
257. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
258. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
259. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
260. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
261. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
262. mailto::joshua.smith at lp.org
263. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
264. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
265. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
266. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
267. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
268. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
269. mailto::joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
270. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
271. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
272. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
273. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
274. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list