[Lnc-business] my audit of LNC At-Large election
Alicia Mattson
alicia.mattson at lp.org
Thu Jul 12 03:17:28 EDT 2018
The At-Large tallies were made under the immense time pressures of the tail
end of the convention, and as in past years, it is not surprising for a
post-convention audit to find errors that were not caught onsite. For your
reading pleasure, you can review the appendices of the minutes of the
previous two conventions for my analyses of those human errors, which take
place even though people are acting in good faith.
None of the errors revealed by my audit of this year's At-Large race change
the outcome. The top 5 people on July 3 remain the top 5 post-audit.
The largest single discrepancy was that the Colorado delegation tally sheet
under-reported Joe Buchman by 5 votes. His relative ranking did not
change, though.
Attached is an Excel workbook with three sheets (or tabs):
- The first contains the state-by-state breakdown that represents the
tallies exactly as released onsite on July 3. You'll notice that some
cells are color-coded, and that's an indicator for you to find the related
note at the bottom of that first tab to answer a potential question about
that number. Each color has its own section of notes, with a header that
explains the color grouping. White, green and yellow cells include values
that did not change in the audited results. The pink cells did change in
the audited results for the reasons noted.
- The second tab contains the audited results, updated to factor in the
issues in the pink cells.
- The third tab contains a comparison of the candidate rankings reported
onsite on July 3 with the rankings for the audited results. The variances
are minor and do not change the top 5 finishers.
Also attached are the delegation tally sheets for comparison with the
details in the spreadsheet. There are 50 sheets, rather than 51. Not
present is the Wyoming sheet. I don't know why that blank page didn't make
it back into my collection, but Wyoming did not vote in any of the
elections, and you can see from the attached spreadsheet that at the time
of this vote they had 0 delegates credentialed.
The Mattson/Scheetz/Hayes cluster of candidates seems to be attracting the
most interest, and the colored cells for that cluster of candidates involve
the CA and TX ballots. These are the two largest delegations, and they had
the largest tallying task, which just gives more opportunities for human
error. Immediately after sending this message, I'll follow up with another
email which has the individual ballots from CA and TX attached for your
tallying pleasure. The size of the scanned files warrants two separate
emails, else I'd include them here. I scanned in full color at 300 dpi so
you can see them in all their glory.
-Alicia
-------------- next part --------------
The At-Large tallies were made under the immense time pressures of the
tail end of the convention, and as in past years, it is not surprising
for a post-convention audit to find errors that were not caught onsite.
For your reading pleasure, you can review the appendices of the minutes
of the previous two conventions for my analyses of those human errors,
which take place even though people are acting in good faith.
None of the errors revealed by my audit of this year's At-Large race
change the outcome. The top 5 people on July 3 remain the top 5
post-audit.
The largest single discrepancy was that the Colorado delegation tally
sheet under-reported Joe Buchman by 5 votes. His relative ranking did
not change, though.
Attached is an Excel workbook with three sheets (or tabs):
* The first contains the state-by-state breakdown that represents the
tallies exactly as released onsite on July 3. You'll notice that
some cells are color-coded, and that's an indicator for you to find
the related note at the bottom of that first tab to answer a
potential question about that number. Each color has its own
section of notes, with a header that explains the color grouping.
White, green and yellow cells include values that did not change in
the audited results. The pink cells did change in the audited
results for the reasons noted.
* The second tab contains the audited results, updated to factor in
the issues in the pink cells.
* The third tab contains a comparison of the candidate rankings
reported onsite on July 3 with the rankings for the audited
results. The variances are minor and do not change the top 5
finishers.
Also attached are the delegation tally sheets for comparison with the
details in the spreadsheet. There are 50 sheets, rather than 51. Not
present is the Wyoming sheet. I don't know why that blank page didn't
make it back into my collection, but Wyoming did not vote in any of the
elections, and you can see from the attached spreadsheet that at the
time of this vote they had 0 delegates credentialed.
The Mattson/Scheetz/Hayes cluster of candidates seems to be attracting
the most interest, and the colored cells for that cluster of candidates
involve the CA and TX ballots. These are the two largest delegations,
and they had the largest tallying task, which just gives more
opportunities for human error. Immediately after sending this message,
I'll follow up with another email which has the individual ballots from
CA and TX attached for your tallying pleasure. The size of the scanned
files warrants two separate emails, else I'd include them here. I
scanned in full color at 300 dpi so you can see them in all their
glory.
-Alicia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Alicia Audit of 2018 LNC At-Large.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 89088 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20180712/32dd7e8a/attachment.xls>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2018 LNC At-Large Tally Sheets.PDF
Type: application/pdf
Size: 17124066 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20180712/32dd7e8a/attachment.pdf>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list