[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC

erin.adams at lp.org erin.adams at lp.org
Thu Jul 12 21:49:02 EDT 2018


Say whatever youd like, It wont change a damn thing. If I was cool with 
being ordered around, Id likely be a member of the duopoly, Im not.Im 
fairly certain anyone who knows me will tell you that Im picky about who 
I let tell me what to do, you dont qualify.

On 2018-07-11 19:09, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> Nonsense.  In your mind, but not mine. My intent matters.
> 
> Believe me, I have no problem stating my mind. IF I want to say, "move
> on", I'll bloody well write that.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> 
> 
> On 2018-07-11 20:02, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>> Elizabeth,
>> The implication is the same. Regardless, you and I will disagree on
>> this, Thats fine.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2018-07-11 18:50, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>> Erin, I never told you to more on.  Nor, did I "insist", that you do.
>>> What are you talking about?  I suggested this:
>>> 
>>> "If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you could
>>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes no
>>> sense."
>>> 
>>> Please go back and reread what I wrote.  I don't appreciate you 
>>> making
>>> up stuff that I never wrote.  Sheesh, it's all right here in writing.
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2018-07-11 19:43, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>>> I am glad we can agree on something. Just as you will continue to 
>>>> hold
>>>> your beliefs and stance, I will do the same. The difference being 
>>>> that
>>>> I am not telling you to move on even tho you insist that I do. I am
>>>> happy we have found agreement
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2018-07-11 18:38, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>>> No one is "diminishing" your stance.  I also stated my opinion.  
>>>>> Nor,
>>>>> am I not going to be silent when I see unwarranted accusations 
>>>>> being
>>>>> tossed around on this list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, that's my opinion.  Also, the accusations that Caryn Ann has 
>>>>> made
>>>>> about people being "silenced' is unwarranted.  (Nor, am I the only 
>>>>> to
>>>>> think this.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> You don't have to agree, but neither do I have to be silent on 
>>>>> this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2018-07-11 19:25, erin.adams at lp.org wrote:
>>>>>> Elizabeth,
>>>>>> It is an overall "feeling", Im clearly not the only person 
>>>>>> "feeling"
>>>>>> this, you dont have to agree, you dont have to acknowledge my 
>>>>>> stance
>>>>>> nor my feeling, you dont get to diminish my stance either. It is 
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> OPINION that there is a push to silence, like it or not, that IS 
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> belief. I dont need to justify that, it simply is.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 13:42, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
>>>>>>> Erin, what others?  I haven't seen anyone on this list try to 
>>>>>>> silence
>>>>>>> others. Most people have discussed, I added the type of feedback 
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> getting in region 3, and what options they're wanting.  Others 
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> done the same.  If anything there's been pressure put on those 
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>> want to move-on, by saying that people will bring up the topic
>>>>>>> constantly, and if a "yes" vote happens, that person immediately 
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> gone after to change their vote.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have voted yet, as I'm still getting opinions from my region, 
>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>> can say that no one has shown an interest in rehashing the 
>>>>>>> At-Large
>>>>>>> vote.  For the JC, more seem inclined to just *not* have a JC, 
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> have the body elect a new JC in 2020. (Some others wish to have 
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> accept the top-seven vote-getters of the JC)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you have a complaint about a specific person, perhaps you 
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>> take it to them off list, but to accuse wholesale those who have
>>>>>>> discussed this issue, of "others" trying to silence people makes 
>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>> sense.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:50, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mr. Bishop-Henchman,
>>>>>>>> YOU may not be but others CERTAINLY are. The tone of many seems 
>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>> Shut up and get over it. Let me be clear that I have NO 
>>>>>>>> intention of
>>>>>>>> doing that.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 09:40, Joe Bishop-Henchman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Ms. Adams,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> By my count we have sent 400 emails to each other in a week. 
>>>>>>>>> Ms.
>>>>>>>>> Harlos has sent 18 emails in the last twelve hours, more than 
>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>> sent in total in a week. People may gripe about it but no one 
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> actually being silenced.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'm doing my best to respond to points being made, answering 
>>>>>>>>> questions
>>>>>>>>> and respectfully if energetically countering arguments.  Your 
>>>>>>>>> response
>>>>>>>>> to me was that the proposal I've sponsored is "bullshit,"
>>>>>>>>> "unacceptable," "gross," "vile," and "sickening." You then 
>>>>>>>>> complained
>>>>>>>>> about the tone of the debate.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I would like to have a good working relationship with all of 
>>>>>>>>> you. On
>>>>>>>>> Bylaws, if I was on the winning side of votes I made sure the 
>>>>>>>>> minority
>>>>>>>>> got a fair shake at presenting their views. If I was on the 
>>>>>>>>> losing
>>>>>>>>> side, I accepted it and did my best to make sure that what we 
>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>>> passed worked. And I never resorted to name-calling or 
>>>>>>>>> martyrdom. The
>>>>>>>>> enemy isn't on this Committee. The enemy are the people out 
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> passing warrantless wiretapping, locking refugee kids up in 
>>>>>>>>> cages,
>>>>>>>>> bombing the world, and spending us into oblivion. I promise I 
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> keep sight of that and will greatly respect all of you who do 
>>>>>>>>> also,
>>>>>>>>> even if we occasionally disagree on how we will do it.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> JBH
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-11 10:24, erin.adams--- via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not 
>>>>>>>>>> true that "
>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>>>  at this point except live with it the best we can for two 
>>>>>>>>>> years." and
>>>>>>>>>> honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some 
>>>>>>>>>> in an
>>>>>>>>>> attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up 
>>>>>>>>>> folks,
>>>>>>>>>> if this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you 
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> hate me the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be 
>>>>>>>>>> dismissed
>>>>>>>>>> and silenced.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections 
>>>>>>>>>>> went awry.
>>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing we can do about it
>>>>>>>>>>> at this point except live with it the best we can for two 
>>>>>>>>>>> years.  We
>>>>>>>>>>> will have a fix in place before the
>>>>>>>>>>> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the 
>>>>>>>>>>> delegates and
>>>>>>>>>>> made effective immediately.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot 
>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>> which is supposed to just be for recording
>>>>>>>>>>> votes on the motion.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my goodness.  I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>>>>>>>>>>>>    I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am 
>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to NOT
>>>>>>>>>>>>    yell it from the rooftops?  What Party am I in again?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>>>    <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Agreed, to a point.  At some time, preaching to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> choir becomes
>>>>>>>>>>>>      counter productive.  As noted earlier, we are all aware 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that it
>>>>>>>>>>>>      sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that 
>>>>>>>>>>>> will make
>>>>>>>>>>>>      everyone happy immediately.  We all want to fix it, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> fix it
>>>>>>>>>>>>      yesterday.  I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's 
>>>>>>>>>>>> points, and yours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Bring it up once a week.  Absolutely.  Don't bring it 
>>>>>>>>>>>> up 5 times a
>>>>>>>>>>>>      day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments 
>>>>>>>>>>>> takes away
>>>>>>>>>>>>      time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in other
>>>>>>>>>>>>      ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us 
>>>>>>>>>>>> up continually
>>>>>>>>>>>>      on a point we 90% or more agree on IS 
>>>>>>>>>>>> counterproductive.  Let's move
>>>>>>>>>>>>      on and FIX IT.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let 
>>>>>>>>>>>> this crap
>>>>>>>>>>>>      happen again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      John Phillips
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Cell 217-412-5973
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be quiet
>>>>>>>>>>>>      about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once 
>>>>>>>>>>>> a week until
>>>>>>>>>>>>      solutions are in place to prevent it from ever 
>>>>>>>>>>>> happening again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Craig Bowden
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Region 1 Alternate
>>>>>>>>>>>>      On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>      I respectfully decline.
>>>>>>>>>>>>         On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>      <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Caryn Ann,
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Just shut up about this already!
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Respectfully,
>>>>>>>>>>>>           ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Sam Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>>>>>>>>           317-850-0726 Cell
>>>>>>>>>>>>         On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>         PS:  Before this vote ends, I am going to put 
>>>>>>>>>>>> something together
>>>>>>>>>>>>      to try
>>>>>>>>>>>>            to convince you that this is actually one of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> worst ways to
>>>>>>>>>>>>         solve.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            My first issue - that of steering the delegates 
>>>>>>>>>>>> down that road
>>>>>>>>>>>>      with
>>>>>>>>>>>>            at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> any way that we
>>>>>>>>>>>>      would
>>>>>>>>>>>>            ever do.  If it were up to me, I would punt it 
>>>>>>>>>>>> all back to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>            delegates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            The second issue - of how to handle this 
>>>>>>>>>>>> situation with the JC
>>>>>>>>>>>>      -
>>>>>>>>>>>>         well
>>>>>>>>>>>>            we are trying to solve it now and I think we are 
>>>>>>>>>>>> solving it
>>>>>>>>>>>>      wrong
>>>>>>>>>>>>         both
>>>>>>>>>>>>            ethically and procedurally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR 
>>>>>>>>>>>> come into
>>>>>>>>>>>>      conflict.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            Rules are tools.  Just because a rule allows 
>>>>>>>>>>>> something doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>      mean
>>>>>>>>>>>>         it
>>>>>>>>>>>>            is right, and this is probably why the first 
>>>>>>>>>>>> issue is sticking
>>>>>>>>>>>>      in my
>>>>>>>>>>>>            craw so badly.  It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> change the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      rules of
>>>>>>>>>>>>         an
>>>>>>>>>>>>            election mid-way.  There is a huge difference 
>>>>>>>>>>>> between majority
>>>>>>>>>>>>      and
>>>>>>>>>>>>            plurality and our candidates deserve to know as 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it effects the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      way
>>>>>>>>>>>>         they
>>>>>>>>>>>>            campaign.  We treated them and their efforts as 
>>>>>>>>>>>> pawns, and it
>>>>>>>>>>>>      isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>            right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            I know some of you are thinking, just shut up 
>>>>>>>>>>>> about this
>>>>>>>>>>>>      already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this 
>>>>>>>>>>>> is one of
>>>>>>>>>>>>      them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>         Just
>>>>>>>>>>>>            like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last 
>>>>>>>>>>>> term.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            The only way we are going to learn as an 
>>>>>>>>>>>> organization is if
>>>>>>>>>>>>      this is
>>>>>>>>>>>>         a
>>>>>>>>>>>>            bit painful.  And in so doing we will model 
>>>>>>>>>>>> over-the-top
>>>>>>>>>>>>      integrity
>>>>>>>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>>>>>>>            our members rather than political expediency.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>            <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>            ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately 
>>>>>>>>>>>> do get the
>>>>>>>>>>>>            state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that 
>>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>>>         delegates
>>>>>>>>>>>>            didn't even vote in the two races because we put 
>>>>>>>>>>>> them off so
>>>>>>>>>>>>      long.
>>>>>>>>>>>>         In
>>>>>>>>>>>>            the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast 
>>>>>>>>>>>> votes in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>>>>>>>            JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by 
>>>>>>>>>>>> those who
>>>>>>>>>>>>      stay and
>>>>>>>>>>>>            vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The 
>>>>>>>>>>>> combination of
>>>>>>>>>>>>      voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>            methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling 
>>>>>>>>>>>> left us in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>      bad
>>>>>>>>>>>>            place.===
>>>>>>>>>>>>            You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now 
>>>>>>>>>>>> are surprised
>>>>>>>>>>>>      we
>>>>>>>>>>>>         got
>>>>>>>>>>>>            ran over?
>>>>>>>>>>>>            But it is more than that.  The delegates were led 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to make a
>>>>>>>>>>>>      decision
>>>>>>>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>>>>>>>            a certain direction.  There WERE other options.  
>>>>>>>>>>>> Whether or
>>>>>>>>>>>>      not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>            agrees with the voting methodology, it is the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> methodology and
>>>>>>>>>>>>      its
>>>>>>>>>>>>            intent was to use approval voting to show 
>>>>>>>>>>>> approval and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>      turned it
>>>>>>>>>>>>         on
>>>>>>>>>>>>            its head.  Why weren't the delegates given other 
>>>>>>>>>>>> options?
>>>>>>>>>>>>            ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and complain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      As far
>>>>>>>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>>>>>>>            actions that can be taken, this resolution is the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> most
>>>>>>>>>>>>      reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> all Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>      members or
>>>>>>>>>>>>         us
>>>>>>>>>>>>            filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> motion - are
>>>>>>>>>>>>      even
>>>>>>>>>>>>         more
>>>>>>>>>>>>            violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>>>>>>>>>>>>            Are they all?  I don't think so. And I do think 
>>>>>>>>>>>> my very real
>>>>>>>>>>>>         complaint
>>>>>>>>>>>>            of how the delegates were steered in a certain 
>>>>>>>>>>>> direction is
>>>>>>>>>>>>      being
>>>>>>>>>>>>            ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>>>>>>>>>>>>            ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of legality:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>>>            delegates expressed their wish to take the top 
>>>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>>>      candidates
>>>>>>>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>>>>>>>            the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's also no
>>>>>>>>>>>>      doubt in
>>>>>>>>>>>>         my
>>>>>>>>>>>>            mind that had they been asked they would have 
>>>>>>>>>>>> done the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>      for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>         JC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            A room of several hundred Libertarians were not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> coerced into
>>>>>>>>>>>>      doing
>>>>>>>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>>>>>>>            - they went with what Nick suggested because 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that's what they
>>>>>>>>>>>>      wanted
>>>>>>>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>>>>>>>            do. He just told them how.===
>>>>>>>>>>>>            And that is where the dispute is.  Most of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> people there
>>>>>>>>>>>>      trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>         us
>>>>>>>>>>>>            (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the LNC
>>>>>>>>>>>>      and this
>>>>>>>>>>>>            isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them 
>>>>>>>>>>>> what they
>>>>>>>>>>>>      wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>         They
>>>>>>>>>>>>            were presented with two choices in which they 
>>>>>>>>>>>> were led down a
>>>>>>>>>>>>            particular path.  You are an attorney Joe, you 
>>>>>>>>>>>> know exactly
>>>>>>>>>>>>      what I
>>>>>>>>>>>>         am
>>>>>>>>>>>>            getting at here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            Do you really think that if they were offered a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>>>>>      rising vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>         on
>>>>>>>>>>>>            the spot to choose between options they would not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> have taken
>>>>>>>>>>>>      that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>         It
>>>>>>>>>>>>            never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any 
>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>      options.  It
>>>>>>>>>>>>            didn't immediately occur to me and I am 
>>>>>>>>>>>> well-versed in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>      stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>         It
>>>>>>>>>>>>            stinks.  If a government acted this way we would 
>>>>>>>>>>>> be all
>>>>>>>>>>>>      lathered up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>            On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>>>            <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>              I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately 
>>>>>>>>>>>> do get the
>>>>>>>>>>>>              state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>>>              delegates didn't even vote in the two races 
>>>>>>>>>>>> because we put
>>>>>>>>>>>>      them
>>>>>>>>>>>>         off
>>>>>>>>>>>>              so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states 
>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't cast
>>>>>>>>>>>>      votes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>              the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> elections are
>>>>>>>>>>>>      won by
>>>>>>>>>>>>              those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it hard. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>              combination of voting methodology, tabulation 
>>>>>>>>>>>> method, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>         scheduling
>>>>>>>>>>>>              left us in a bad place.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              All that said, I don't want to just be angry 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and complain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>      As far
>>>>>>>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>>>>>>>              actions that can be taken, this resolution is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the most
>>>>>>>>>>>>      reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> all Party
>>>>>>>>>>>>      members
>>>>>>>>>>>>         or
>>>>>>>>>>>>              us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in motion -
>>>>>>>>>>>>      are
>>>>>>>>>>>>         even
>>>>>>>>>>>>              more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that every JC
>>>>>>>>>>>>              candidate was disapproved and that it should 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sit empty until
>>>>>>>>>>>>      2022.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of legality:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>>>              delegates expressed their wish to take the top 
>>>>>>>>>>>> at-large
>>>>>>>>>>>>      candidates
>>>>>>>>>>>>              and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>>>>>>>      no
>>>>>>>>>>>>              doubt in my mind that had they been asked they 
>>>>>>>>>>>> would have
>>>>>>>>>>>>      done the
>>>>>>>>>>>>              same for the JC. A room of several hundred 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarians were
>>>>>>>>>>>>      not
>>>>>>>>>>>>              coerced into doing that - they went with what 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nick suggested
>>>>>>>>>>>>         because
>>>>>>>>>>>>              that's what they wanted to do. He just told 
>>>>>>>>>>>> them how. They
>>>>>>>>>>>>      didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>              want the LNC fighting over who would fill the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> seats if they
>>>>>>>>>>>>      were
>>>>>>>>>>>>              left vacant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did 
>>>>>>>>>>>> want to write
>>>>>>>>>>>>      this to
>>>>>>>>>>>>              emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sweeping
>>>>>>>>>>>>      anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>              blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how 
>>>>>>>>>>>> we do
>>>>>>>>>>>>      elections
>>>>>>>>>>>>         will
>>>>>>>>>>>>              be a big priority for many of us.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              JBH
>>>>>>>>>>>>              On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>>>      wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Suspension of the rules has to be specific and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>      way
>>>>>>>>>>>>              around
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 the fact that we used the number 5 over and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 This is taking things to an even deeper 
>>>>>>>>>>>> level of
>>>>>>>>>>>>      improper.  I
>>>>>>>>>>>>              object to
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 the whole at-Large process- I don’t think 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the delegates
>>>>>>>>>>>>      made an
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 independent choice and now to just infer 
>>>>>>>>>>>> this upon that
>>>>>>>>>>>>      is two
>>>>>>>>>>>>              bridges
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 too far.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sweeping it
>>>>>>>>>>>>      under
>>>>>>>>>>>>              the rug.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 It alarms me to no end how blithely the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> whole situation
>>>>>>>>>>>>      is
>>>>>>>>>>>>         being
>>>>>>>>>>>>              taken.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 There are people looking at us and seeing 
>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>>>>>>>>      different
>>>>>>>>>>>>         than
>>>>>>>>>>>>              the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 government we wish to reform.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 There was a controversial election and at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> least one state
>>>>>>>>>>>>      chair
>>>>>>>>>>>>              and
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 candidate has been asking for the state by 
>>>>>>>>>>>> state rallies
>>>>>>>>>>>>      with
>>>>>>>>>>>>         no
>>>>>>>>>>>>              time
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 frame given him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 The whole thing was an affront to people 
>>>>>>>>>>>> expecting an
>>>>>>>>>>>>      entirely
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 different thing when they ran.  I will not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> be sanguine
>>>>>>>>>>>>      about
>>>>>>>>>>>>         it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   This point did come up immediately after 
>>>>>>>>>>>> adjournment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>      while
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Nick
>>>>>>>>>>>>                was
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   still at the mic. I don't recall who 
>>>>>>>>>>>> brought it up, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                statement
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   was made that it would follow the same 
>>>>>>>>>>>> procedure as
>>>>>>>>>>>>      At-Large
>>>>>>>>>>>>           at
>>>>>>>>>>>>                that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   point, since we were no longer in session.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   No one raised the question prior to that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Region 7 Representative
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Harlos via
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        Joshua they were not given a choice 
>>>>>>>>>>>> on this. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>      JC
>>>>>>>>>>>>           never
>>>>>>>>>>>>                came
>>>>>>>>>>>>                     up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>                <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      I vote yes. Given that the delegates 
>>>>>>>>>>>> were given the
>>>>>>>>>>>>      choice
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      convention
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      just a few short days ago, I believe we 
>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>      respect
>>>>>>>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      decision.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      Joshua D. Smith
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos 
>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Lnc-business
>>>>>>>>>>>>         wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      > We have an electronic mail ballot. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Votes are due
>>>>>>>>>>>>      to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      LNC-Business
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      >    list by July 14, 2018 at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:59:59pm Pacific
>>>>>>>>>>>>      time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 Co-Sponsors:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      >    Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Merced, Van
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Horn
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 Motion:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      Move
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      > that
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      >    the Libertarian National Committee 
>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledge
>>>>>>>>>>>>      the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 election of
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      >    following to the Judicial 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>      four-year
>>>>>>>>>>>>            term:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 D.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      Frank
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      >    Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Perry, Ruth
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Bennett,
>>>>>>>>>>>>            Geoff
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      Neale,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      > Jim
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      >    Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You 
>>>>>>>>>>>> can keep track
>>>>>>>>>>>>      of
>>>>>>>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      Secretary's
>>>>>>>>>>>>                      >    manual tally of votes here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    --
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    --
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Region 1 Representative, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>>>      National
>>>>>>>>>>>>                Committee
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          (Alaska,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kansas, Montana,
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Utah,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                Wyoming,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          > Washington)
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Communications Director, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]Libertarian
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Party of
>>>>>>>>>>>>                Colorado
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Chair, LP Historical 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Preservation Committee
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    A haiku to the Statement of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          > References
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    1. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co
>>>>>>>>>>>>      m/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    2. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                          >    3. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>>>>>>>>>>>>      ado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        --
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        --
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        Libertarian Party and Libertarian 
>>>>>>>>>>>> National
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Committee
>>>>>>>>>>>>                Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        Chair, LP Historical Preservation 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>>>           LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        A haiku to the Statement of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>>                     References
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        1. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        2. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        3. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        5. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>                        6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   --
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   --
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Libertarian Party and Libertarian National 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Chair, LP Historical Preservation 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee -
>>>>>>>>>>>>      LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>>                References
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   1. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   2. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   4. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   5. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   8. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                   9. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                  13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>                --
>>>>>>>>>>>>              JBH
>>>>>>>>>>>>              ------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Joe Bishop-Henchman
>>>>>>>>>>>>              LNC Member (At-Large)
>>>>>>>>>>>>              [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>>>>>> [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>>>              In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Libertarian Party and Libertarian National 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>>>              - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>              We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>              And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>>>              --
>>>>>>>>>>>>              In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Libertarian Party and Libertarian National 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Committee
>>>>>>>>>>>>      Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>>>              - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>              We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>              And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>>>              Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>>           References
>>>>>>>>>>>>              1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>              6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>              7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>              8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>              9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>             11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>             12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>             13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>             17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>             18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>             19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>             21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>             22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>             24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             27. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>             28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>             29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         --
>>>>>>>>>>>>         --
>>>>>>>>>>>>         In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>         Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>         Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>>>         - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>         Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>         We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>         And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>>>         Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>>      References
>>>>>>>>>>>>         1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>         7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>         8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>         9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        25. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>        26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>        47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>        49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        52. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>        53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>        55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    --
>>>>>>>>>>>>    --
>>>>>>>>>>>>    In Liberty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Caryn Ann Harlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Secretary
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - 
>>>>>>>>>>>> LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    We defend your rights
>>>>>>>>>>>>    And oppose the use of force
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Taxation is theft
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> References
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>    8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>    9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>   27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>   51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>   76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>>>>>>>>>>>>   97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>   98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>   99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>  100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>  101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>  102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>>>>>>>>>>>>  103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>  104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>  105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>  106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org





More information about the Lnc-business mailing list