[Lnc-business] Seeking Co-Sponsors: Motion to set the September Meeting Location
Sam Goldstein
sam.goldstein at lp.org
Thu Jul 19 09:31:16 EDT 2018
John,
There is no reason to rent a space for a LNC meeting. Typically we use
a hotel board room for the meeting at no little or no cost to
the party as long as we buy food (usually a lunch) and have a certain
number of hotel rooms used by participants. You
can always chip in for a part of the cost of the lunch to offset that
cost.
We are asking LNC members to travel across the country at their own
expense for travel and lodging. I doubt most dues paying
members of the party would begrudge the expense of a meal every 3-4
months for those doing the party's business.
Live Free,
---
Sam Goldstein
Libertarian National Committee
317-850-0726 Cell
On 2018-07-19 08:16, john.phillips--- via Lnc-business wrote:
> Lots of valid points, by everyone. Some that I had considered, some I
> had not, and some poor assumptions on my part (like that every one
> else
> knew these people and just the new guy didn't).
> Given all those very valid concerns I will have to fall on the side
> of
> no out of respect for those.
> I would however be curious as to the cost of renting a space, and
> perhaps be willing to throw in an extra donation to help offset that
> cost.
> John Phillips
> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> Cell [1]217-412-5973
>
> ------ Original message------
> From: Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
> Date: Thu, Jul 19, 2018 1:04 AM
> To: Richard Longstreth;
> Cc: Caryn Ann Harlos;Libertarian National Committee list;
> Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Seeking Co-Sponsors: Motion to set the
> September Meeting Location
> Thank you for considering my points.
>
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Richard Longstreth <[2]
> richard.longstreth at lp.org> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the very reasonable argument! I hadn't considered that
>> viewpoint and completely understand not supporting this for those
>> reasons.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 22:10 Caryn Ann Harlos
>> wrote:
>>
>>> And there are liability concerns.
>>>
>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>
>>> And to preempt Starchild's always rebuttal. "But what about those
>>> Friday
>>> night parties?" A party is a totally different context and is
>>> OPTIONAL. I
>>> go there were several members of the LNC that I know well, there is
>>> zero
>>> chance for conflict, and it is very very short term, a couple of
>>> hours at
>>> most. And each time so far, it has been someone I know. There
>>> may be a
>>> time where I don't go to the Friday party.
>>>
>>> Oh my word, I can just see us setting up a projector in someone's
>>> house.
>>> Me dragging in a cooler of diet mountain dews and none of us wanting
>>> to
>>> snack for fear of being too messy. And if someone just wants to
>>> leave,
>>> rather than a polite excusal and out the door, one has to make a big
>>> show
>>> of it and get an uber. And what about executive session? We ban
>>> guests to
>>> the back yard? Stand in line for the toilet?
>>>
>>> It is very very generous of the Hancock's to offer and NONE of this
>>> is
>>> about them. My frustration is how my concerns have gone ignored by
>>> Starchild for years and just brushed off. My frustration is that
>>> this a
>>> real safety concern for female members of our Party and it is treated
>>> by
>>> him like nothing. He knows my frustration at this.
>>>
>>> Business for most people requires a business atmosphere. I
>>> understand
>>> that Starchild is concerned about those uncomfortable in traditional
>>> atmospheres. You can't please everyone. Ever. But I don't think
>>> keeping
>>> a custom of business in a business conference room is so outrageous,
>>> particularly considering the safety concerns that ladies who know
>>> none of
>>> us will have.
>>>
>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>>> [3] caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh sorry I forgot I would be the one to start a ballot!
>>>>
>>>> I have fought with Starchild for two years on this. It is highly
>>>> prejudicial to female members of the party, and I personally am very
>>>> uncomfortable with a business meeting in these circumstances. *WE
>>>> ARE
>>>> THE THIRD LARGEST POLITICAL PARTY IN THE COUNTRY.*
>>>>
>>>> Let's not make this look reasonable.
>>>>
>>>> [4]https://politics.theonion.com/l-a-efficiency-chosen-as-site-
>>>> of-2000-libertarian-conv-[5]1819565649
>>>>
>>>> Starchild sometimes just dismisses the concerns of others when he
>>>> doesn't understand them. I told him this so this criticism is no
>>>> surprise.
>>>>
>>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>>>> [6] caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I vote no.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have always been opposed to this and I will explain why. A
>>>>> business
>>>>> meeting should be something *everyone* is comfortable with. Women,
>>>>> in
>>>>> general, are not comfortable going to a home of someone they do not
>>>>> know --
>>>>> I am not referring to committee members. I am referring to members
>>>>> outside
>>>>> of that. I *would never* travel elsewhere unaccompanied and my
>>>>> husband I
>>>>> would just be at so and so's house that he doesn't know.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is very uncomfortable. And it is uncomfortable for business.
>>>>> You
>>>>> never know what can come up. And sometimes things get heated.
>>>>> Where do
>>>>> you storm off to? The back yard? I have never stormed off but it
>>>>> has
>>>>> happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely not. What if someone gets ill? There are a WHOLE lot
>>>>> of
>>>>> unforseens.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hell even in CO we knew not to have board meetings at people's
>>>>> homes
>>>>> for these reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Richard Longstreth via
>>>>> Lnc-business <
>>>>> [7] lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sam, thank you for your consideration and vote prior to getting
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> questions answered and a ballot declared. I would ask that if
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> quesitons or concerns, please ask them so that we may get the
>>>>>> answers.
>>>>>> I also ask that you do not blankedtly dismiss this or any idea
>>>>>> prior to
>>>>>> having an opportunity to address the concerns and make a proper
>>>>>> determination as to whether this venue will suffice.
>>>>>> I believe many of these concerns are implicitly answered by
>>>>>> reading
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> email Starchild copied us on where he laid out our
>>>>>> requirements. I
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> also asked Mr Hancock Whitney's questions and will await his
>>>>>> response
>>>>>> before asking more.
>>>>>> Tim, Starchild did mention wifi in his initial inquiry and
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> Mr
>>>>>> Hancock did not explicitly state his capabilities, I will be
>>>>>> asking
>>>>>> this question.
>>>>>> Hotels in Arizona are fairly cheap, in general and provided you
>>>>>> aren't
>>>>>> looking for 5 star. I regularly am staying in one throughough
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Phoenix area and find the price range to be slightly better
>>>>>> than
>>>>>> average when compared to traveling outside of the state. The
>>>>>> average
>>>>>> Hampton Inn is right around $100-$110 as price point. I
>>>>>> typically
>>>>>> stay
>>>>>> in Choice Brands and pay an average of $60 a night. I will
>>>>>> attempt
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> find out the specific area and advise further. Remember, due to
>>>>>> temperatures, this is the tail end of our slow season.
>>>>>> The question of transport is fair, however, I note that many on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> LNC
>>>>>> will need to transport wherever we are meeting anyway. Whether
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> from the airport to the hotel and we meet in the hotel or
>>>>>> something
>>>>>> else. If it could save our membership hundreds, if not
>>>>>> thousands, by
>>>>>> not renting out a space, I think it is worth at least a
>>>>>> consideration
>>>>>> before rejecting the idea completely and not rejecting on a
>>>>>> free
>>>>>> offer
>>>>>> at face value. I have a car and am willing to pack it like
>>>>>> sardines
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> save you an uber or lyft, if that is your concern.
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:57 PM Tim Hagan via Lnc-business
>>>>>> <[1[8]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Average high for September 29 & 30 is 95 degrees. Record high
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> September 29 was 107 degrees in 2003. September is the end of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> monsoon season, so the end of the month is less likely to
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> thunderstorms or humidity.
>>>>>> Does the place have WiFi to live-stream the meeting? What are
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> room
>>>>>> rates for the hotels nearby or within walking distance?
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Tim Hagan
>>>>>> Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>> On [9]2018-07-18 20:09, Whitney Bilyeu via Lnc-business
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > Also, temperatures in Phoenix in September...75-100 on
>>>>>> average?
>>>>>> > Something to consider for the outdoor meeting
>>>>>> proposal...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 10:00 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>>>>>> > <[1][2[10]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > How far is this place from the airport? How far from the
>>>>>> nearest
>>>>>> > hotel?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 9:49 PM Richard Longstreth via
>>>>>> Lnc-business
>>>>>> > <[2][3[11]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Motion: In order to save the general membership
>>>>>> funds, I
>>>>>> move
>>>>>> > to
>>>>>> > set
>>>>>> > the September Meeting location at the home of
>>>>>> Ernest and
>>>>>> Donna
>>>>>> > Hancock.
>>>>>> > ===
>>>>>> > Rationale: A member in the Phoenix area has
>>>>>> indicated
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> > have
>>>>>> > the space available, at no charge, to host our
>>>>>> meeting.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>> > meeting
>>>>>> > location has not currently been set and I am
>>>>>> unaware of
>>>>>> where
>>>>>> > we
>>>>>> > are at
>>>>>> > as far as determining a location. After asking the
>>>>>> question
>>>>>> > last
>>>>>> > week
>>>>>> > and getting no official answer, I am now moving to
>>>>>> set
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> > location
>>>>>> > ahead of any official announcement. I would
>>>>>> encourage
>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>> > to
>>>>>> > review the email Starchild sent to us yesterday
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> includes
>>>>>> > comments
>>>>>> > from Ernie, the homeowner.
>>>>>> > Richard Longstreth
>>>>>> > Region 1 Representative
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Richard Longstreth
>>>>>> > Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM,
>>>>>> OR, HI,
>>>>>> UT,
>>>>>> > WA,
>>>>>> > WY)
>>>>>> > Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>> > [1][3][4[12]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> > [5][13]931.538.9300
>>>>>> > References
>>>>>> > 1. mailto:[4][6[14]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > References
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 1. mailto:[7[15]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>> > 2. mailto:[8[16]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> > 3. mailto:[9[17]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> > 4. mailto:[10[18]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Richard Longstreth
>>>>>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
>>>>>> WA, WY)
>>>>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>>>>> [11[19]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> [20]931.538.9300
>>>>>>
>>>>>> References
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. mailto[21]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> 2. mailto[22]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>> 3. mailto[23]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> 4. mailto[24]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> 5. tel:[25](931) 538-9300
>>>>>> 6. mailto[26]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> 7. mailto[27]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>>>>>> 8. mailto[28]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>>>> 9. mailto[29]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> 10. mailto[30]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>> 11. mailto[31]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
>>>>> [32]Caryn.
> Ann.
>>>>> [33] Harlos at LP.org or[34] Secretary at LP.org.
>>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[35] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>>
>>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>>> *We defend your rights*
>>>>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>>>> *Taxation is theft*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> *In Liberty,*
>>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
>>>> [36]Caryn.A
> nn.
>>>> [37] Harlos at LP.org or[38] Secretary at LP.org.
>>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[39] LPedia at LP.org
>>>>
>>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>>> *We defend your rights*
>>>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>>> *Taxation is theft*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> *In Liberty,*
>>> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
>>> [40]Caryn.An
> n.
>>> [41] Harlos at LP.org or[42] Secretary at LP.org.
>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[43] LPedia at LP.org
>>>
>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>> *We defend your rights*
>>> *And oppose the use of force*
>>> *Taxation is theft*
>>>
>> --
>> Richard Longstreth
>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA, WY)
>> Libertarian National Committee
>> [44] richard.longstreth at lp.org
>> [45]931.538.9300
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *In Liberty,*
> *Caryn Ann Harlos*
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
> [46]Caryn.Ann.[
> 47]
> Harlos at LP.org or[48] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[49] LPedia at LP.org
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> *We defend your rights*
> *And oppose the use of force*
> *Taxation is theft*
>
> Thank you for considering my points.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Richard Longstreth
> <[1[50]]richard.longstreth at lp.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the very reasonable argument! I hadn't considered
> that
> viewpoint and completely understand not supporting this for those
> reasons.
>
> Richard
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 22:10 Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[2[51]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> And there are liability concerns.
> -Caryn Ann
> And to preempt Starchild's always rebuttal. "But what about those
> Friday night parties?" A party is a totally different context and
> is
> OPTIONAL. I go there were several members of the LNC that I know
> well,
> there is zero chance for conflict, and it is very very short term, a
> couple of hours at most. And each time so far, it has been
> someone
> I know. There may be a time where I don't go to the Friday party.
> Oh my word, I can just see us setting up a projector in someone's
> house. Me dragging in a cooler of diet mountain dews and none of us
> wanting to snack for fear of being too messy. And if someone just
> wants to leave, rather than a polite excusal and out the door, one
> has
> to make a big show of it and get an uber. And what about executive
> session? We ban guests to the back yard? Stand in line for the
> toilet?
> It is very very generous of the Hancock's to offer and NONE of this
> is
> about them. My frustration is how my concerns have gone ignored by
> Starchild for years and just brushed off. My frustration is that
> this
> a real safety concern for female members of our Party and it is
> treated
> by him like nothing. He knows my frustration at this.
> Business for most people requires a business atmosphere. I
> understand
> that Starchild is concerned about those uncomfortable in traditional
> atmospheres. You can't please everyone. Ever. But I don't think
> keeping a custom of business in a business conference room is so
> outrageous, particularly considering the safety concerns that ladies
> who know none of us will have.
>
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[3[52]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> Oh sorry I forgot I would be the one to start a ballot!
> I have fought with Starchild for two years on this. It is highly
> prejudicial to female members of the party, and I personally am very
> uncomfortable with a business meeting in these circumstances. WE
> ARE
> THE THIRD LARGEST POLITICAL PARTY IN THE COUNTRY.
> Let's not make this look reasonable.
> [4][53]https://politics.theonion.com/l-a-efficiency-chosen-as-site-
> of-2000-libertarian-conv-[54]1819565649
> Starchild sometimes just dismisses the concerns of others when he
> doesn't understand them. I told him this so this criticism is no
> surprise.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
> <[5[55]]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>
> I vote no.
> I have always been opposed to this and I will explain why. A
> business
> meeting should be something *everyone* is comfortable with. Women,
> in
> general, are not comfortable going to a home of someone they do not
> know -- I am not referring to committee members. I am referring to
> members outside of that. I *would never* travel elsewhere
> unaccompanied and my husband I would just be at so and so's house
> that
> he doesn't know.
> It is very uncomfortable. And it is uncomfortable for business.
> You
> never know what can come up. And sometimes things get heated.
> Where
> do you storm off to? The back yard? I have never stormed off but
> it
> has happened.
> Absolutely not. What if someone gets ill? There are a WHOLE lot of
> unforseens.
> Hell even in CO we knew not to have board meetings at people's homes
> for these reasons.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Richard Longstreth via
> Lnc-business
> <[6[56]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> Sam, thank you for your consideration and vote prior to getting
> the
> questions answered and a ballot declared. I would ask that if
> you have
> quesitons or concerns, please ask them so that we may get the
> answers.
> I also ask that you do not blankedtly dismiss this or any idea
> prior to
> having an opportunity to address the concerns and make a proper
> determination as to whether this venue will suffice.
> I believe many of these concerns are implicitly answered by
> reading the
> email Starchild copied us on where he laid out our
> requirements.
> I have
> also asked Mr Hancock Whitney's questions and will await his
> response
> before asking more.
> Tim, Starchild did mention wifi in his initial inquiry and
> because Mr
> Hancock did not explicitly state his capabilities, I will be
> asking
> this question.
> Hotels in Arizona are fairly cheap, in general and provided you
> aren't
> looking for 5 star. I regularly am staying in one throughough
> the
> Phoenix area and find the price range to be slightly better
> than
> average when compared to traveling outside of the state. The
> average
> Hampton Inn is right around $100-$110 as price point. I
> typically
> stay
> in Choice Brands and pay an average of $60 a night. I will
> attempt to
> find out the specific area and advise further. Remember, due to
> temperatures, this is the tail end of our slow season.
> The question of transport is fair, however, I note that many on
> the LNC
> will need to transport wherever we are meeting anyway. Whether
> that is
> from the airport to the hotel and we meet in the hotel or
> something
> else. If it could save our membership hundreds, if not
> thousands,
> by
> not renting out a space, I think it is worth at least a
> consideration
> before rejecting the idea completely and not rejecting on a
> free
> offer
> at face value. I have a car and am willing to pack it like
> sardines to
> save you an uber or lyft, if that is your concern.
> Richard
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:57 PM Tim Hagan via Lnc-business
> <[1][7[57]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Average high for September 29 & 30 is 95 degrees. Record high
> for
> September 29 was 107 degrees in 2003. September is the end of
> the
> monsoon season, so the end of the month is less likely to
> have
> thunderstorms or humidity.
> Does the place have WiFi to live-stream the meeting? What are
> the
> room
> rates for the hotels nearby or within walking distance?
> ---
> Tim Hagan
> Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
> On [58]2018-07-18 20:09, Whitney Bilyeu via Lnc-business
> wrote:
> > Also, temperatures in Phoenix in September...75-100 on
> average?
> > Something to consider for the outdoor meeting
> proposal...
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 10:00 PM Whitney Bilyeu
> > <[1][2][8[59]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > How far is this place from the airport? How far from the
> nearest
> > hotel?
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 9:49 PM Richard Longstreth via
> Lnc-business
>
> > <[2][3][9[60]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > Motion: In order to save the general membership
> funds, I
> move
> > to
> > set
> > the September Meeting location at the home of Ernest
> and
> Donna
> > Hancock.
> > ===
> > Rationale: A member in the Phoenix area has indicated
> that
> they
> > have
> > the space available, at no charge, to host our
> meeting.
> The
> > meeting
> > location has not currently been set and I am unaware
> of
> where
> > we
> > are at
> > as far as determining a location. After asking the
> question
> > last
> > week
> > and getting no official answer, I am now moving to
> set
> the
> > location
> > ahead of any official announcement. I would encourage
> everyone
> > to
> > review the email Starchild sent to us yesterday which
> includes
> > comments
> > from Ernie, the homeowner.
> > Richard Longstreth
> > Region 1 Representative
> > --
> > Richard Longstreth
> > Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR,
> HI,
> UT,
> > WA,
> > WY)
> > Libertarian National Committee
>
> > [1][3][4][10[61]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > [5][62]931.538.9300
> > References
> > 1. mailto:[4][6][11[63]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. mailto:[7][12[64]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> > 2. mailto:[8][13[65]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 3. mailto:[9][14[66]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > 4. mailto:[10][15[67]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> --
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT,
> WA,
> WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> [11][16[68]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> [69]931.538.9300
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[17[70]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2. mailto:[18[71]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 3. mailto:[19[72]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 4. mailto:[20[73]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 5. tel:[74](931) 538-9300
> 6. mailto:[21[75]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 7. mailto:[22[76]]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 8. mailto:[23[77]]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 9. mailto:[24[78]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 10. mailto:[25[79]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 11. mailto:[26[80]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [27][81]Caryn.Ann.[82] Harlos at LP.org or[83] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[84] LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [28][85]Caryn.Ann.[86] Harlos at LP.org or[87] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[88] LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [29][89]Caryn.Ann.[90] Harlos at LP.org or[91] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[92] LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> --
>
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI, UT, WA, WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
> [30[93]]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> [94]931.538.9300
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
> - [31][95]Caryn.Ann.[96] Harlos at LP.org or[97] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[98] LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto[99]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 2. mailto[100]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 3. mailto[101]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 4.
> [102]https://politics.theonion.com/l-a-efficiency-chosen-as-site-of-2000-l
> ibertarian-conv-1819565649
> 5. mailto[103]:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 6. mailto[104]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 7. mailto[105]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 8. mailto[106]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 9. mailto[107]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 10. mailto[108]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 11. mailto[109]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 12. mailto[110]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 13. mailto[111]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 14. mailto[112]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 15. mailto[113]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 16. mailto[114]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 17. mailto[115]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 18. mailto[116]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 19. mailto[117]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 20. mailto[118]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 21. mailto[119]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 22. mailto[120]:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 23. mailto[121]:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 24. mailto[122]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 25. mailto[123]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 26. mailto[124]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 27. mailto[125]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 28. mailto[126]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 29. mailto[127]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 30. mailto[128]:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 31. mailto[129]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
> References
>
> 1. tel:217-412-5973
> 2. mailto:
> richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 3. mailto: caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 4. https://politics.theonion.com/l-a-efficiency-chosen-as-site-
> 5. tel:1819565649
> 6. mailto: caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 7. mailto: lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 8. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 9. tel:2018-07-18 20
> 10. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 11. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 12. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 13. tel:931.538.9300
> 14. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 15. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 16. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 17. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 18. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 19. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 20. tel:931.538.9300
> 21. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 22. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 23. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 24. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 25. tel:(931) 538-9300
> 26. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 27. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 28. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 29. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 30. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 31. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 32. http://Caryn.An/
> 33. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 34. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 35. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 36. http://Caryn.An/
> 37. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 38. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 39. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 40. http://Caryn.An/
> 41. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 42. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 43. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 44. mailto: richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 45. tel:931.538.9300
> 46. http://Caryn.An/
> 47. mailto:
> Harlos at LP.org
> 48. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 49. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 50. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 51. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 52. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 53. https://politics.theonion.com/l-a-efficiency-chosen-as-site-
> 54. tel:1819565649
> 55. mailto:]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 56. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 57. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 58. tel:2018-07-18 20
> 59. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 60. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 61. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 62. tel:931.538.9300
> 63. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 64. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 65. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 66. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 67. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 68. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 69. tel:931.538.9300
> 70. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 71. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 72. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 73. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 74. tel:(931) 538-9300
> 6
> 75. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 76. mailto:]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 77. mailto:]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 78. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 79. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 80. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 81. http://Caryn.An/
> 82. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 83. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 84. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 85. http://Caryn.An/
> 86. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 87. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 88. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 89. http://Caryn.An/
> 90. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 91. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 92. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 93. mailto:]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 94. tel:931.538.9300
> 95. http://Caryn.An/
> 96. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 97. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 98. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 99. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 100. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 101. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 102.
> https://politics.theonion.com/l-a-efficiency-chosen-as-site-of-2000-libertarian-conv-1819565649
> 103. mailto::caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> 104. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 105. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 106. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 107. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 108. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 109. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 110. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 111. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 112. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 113. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 114. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 115. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 116. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 117. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 118. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 119. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 120. mailto::whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
> 121. mailto::lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 122. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 123. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 124. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 125. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 126. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 127. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 128. mailto::richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 129. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list