[Lnc-business] Seeking Feedback: Membership Support Committee
Elizabeth Van Horn
elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
Sun Aug 26 19:23:58 EDT 2018
There are plenty of LNC members who aren't on multiple committees.
(You're listed on five committees under subcommittees on the LP website,
so perhaps you'd not want to join any more.)
We also have LNC members who aren't on *any* subcommittees. I think
limiting the number of LNC members on a subcommittee, just because
historically, some LNC members sought and obtained appointment to
multiple committees, is an unfair handling of how we populate
subcommittees.
I'd vote for four LNC members on this committee as originally proposed,
and I'd like to see the number of non-LNC members expanded to five.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
http://www.lpcaucus.org/
On 2018-08-26 18:38, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> There is no stopping Regionals from volnteering or attending.
>
> With all these committees requiring LNC members two things happen:
>
> 1. Members see the same people on committee after committee and are resentful
>
> 2. The committees get less effective as we are stretched thin.
>
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 2:18 PM Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
>
>> I have no problem designating a number of LNC members to be on a
>> Membership Support Committee, and think it would be helpful for LNC
>> Region Reps to be on such a committee, as we get a lot of direct
>> feedback from our state affiliates. The type of feedback we get often
>> speaks directly to membership issues.
>>
>> Friday I spend time listening to members who're candidates in my Region,
>> as some are very frustrated with the LP launched CRM project. I got
>> feedback from multiple members, sent emails, and even spoke to Nicholas
>> Sarwark on the phone, as he was responsive enough to call me concerning
>> this issue. (Tentatively, an issue was resolved.) I plan to do some
>> follow-up to see if further issues can be resolved, as there are
>> multiple LP candidates who're not happy with LP national's release
>> product-options for CRM. I'm not on the Candidate Support Committee, but
>> spent time doing candidate support, as it's *member* support. (I realize
>> the Candidate Support Committee isn't described as direct support.)
>>
>> Since various members contact their LNC Region Reps for member related
>> issues, I'd like to be on the Membership Support Committee, and would
>> like to have the committee composition comprised of four LNC members.
>>
>> In addition, I'd expand the non-LNC members and add two more than
>> proposed, making the non-LNC members five. Small committees sometimes
>> have several people unable to make a meeting, even when online, and when
>> there's only seven people, and two are missing, it's hard to come to a
>> meaningful agreement, as so few are represented. Also, since we do have
>> such an abundance of LP members wishing to help, expanding the non-LNC
>> members number would help our members, as there'd be a larger pool of
>> people would to assist.
>>
>> For the reasons mentioned above, I'd like to see the Membership Support
>> Committee have nine people, four LNC members, and five non-LNC members.
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>> On 2018-08-26 13:59, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>> Much much better. I have a question though - why so many LNC members?
>>> We are stretched thin and there are many many members who want to
>>> help. I would like to see committees - particularly ones with
>>> absolutely no budget - to be member ran with the composition of that
>>> committee approved by the LNC not just the LNC chair (if we reduced
>>> the
>>> LNC membership of the committee - if kept as it is right now, only
>>> approval by the Chair is necessary).
>>> The Historical Committee - which actually HAS a budget has NO
>>> required
>>> LNC members. Why are we not moving towards that model?
>>> tldr; I am likely to vote against if the number of LNC members is
>>> not
>>> reduced. We can always volunteer to be appointed. I would like to
>>> see
>>> NO required LNC members.
>>> ************
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 10:49 AM Alex Merced (LNC Vice Chair) via
>>> Lnc-business <[4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Below is the newer wording for what used to be the
>>> Retention/Outreach
>>> committee motion. I have simplified the motion based on what I
>>> saw on
>>> the email ballots of committee motions from previous LNC terms.
>>> My intention is to create a committee that want to help provide
>>> some
>>> extra hands to the staff in Membership related tasks and fact
>>> finding
>>> (making thank you calls/emails). Since this can be quite a wide
>>> range
>>> of activities I chose to not define them within the motion so
>>> the
>>> committee chair or the committee can coordinate with the
>>> Membership
>>> Manager and other staff on how they can be helpful.
>>> -------------------------
>>> Membership Support Committee
>>> Create a Membership Support Committee consisting of four LNC
>>> members or
>>> LNC alternates and three non-LNC members of the LP. The LNC
>>> members of
>>> the committee are elected by the LNC and the non-LNC members
>>> are
>>> appointed by the LNC Chair based on recommendations from the
>>> LNC
>>> members of the committee. The LNC Chair will appoint an
>>> Interim
>>> Chair
>>> of the Membership Support Committee until a permanent Chair can
>>> be
>>> elected by its' members.
>>> The Membership Support Committee will seek to find ways to
>>> support LP
>>> staff in matters of membership growth and retention. The
>>> committee
>>> will submit a report of its activities at the 2nd and 4th LNC
>>> meetings
>>> each year.
>>> Alex Merced
>>> Vice Chair of the Libertarian National Committee/LP
>>>
>>>
> --
-------------- next part --------------
There are plenty of LNC members who aren't on multiple committees.
(You're listed on five committees under subcommittees on the LP
website, so perhaps you'd not want to join any more.)
We also have LNC members who aren't on *any* subcommittees. I think
limiting the number of LNC members on a subcommittee, just because
historically, some LNC members sought and obtained appointment to
multiple committees, is an unfair handling of how we populate
subcommittees.
I'd vote for four LNC members on this committee as originally proposed,
and I'd like to see the number of non-LNC members expanded to five.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
[1]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
On 2018-08-26 18:38, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
There is no stopping Regionals from volnteering or attending.
With all these committees requiring LNC members two things happen:
1. Members see the same people on committee after committee and are
resentful
2. The committees get less effective as we are stretched thin.
-Caryn Ann
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 2:18 PM Elizabeth Van Horn
<[2]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
I have no problem designating a number of LNC members to be on a
Membership Support Committee, and think it would be helpful for LNC
Region Reps to be on such a committee, as we get a lot of direct
feedback from our state affiliates. The type of feedback we get
often
speaks directly to membership issues.
Friday I spend time listening to members who're candidates in my
Region,
as some are very frustrated with the LP launched CRM project. I got
feedback from multiple members, sent emails, and even spoke to
Nicholas
Sarwark on the phone, as he was responsive enough to call me
concerning
this issue. (Tentatively, an issue was resolved.) I plan to do some
follow-up to see if further issues can be resolved, as there are
multiple LP candidates who're not happy with LP national's release
product-options for CRM. I'm not on the Candidate Support Committee,
but
spent time doing candidate support, as it's *member* support. (I
realize
the Candidate Support Committee isn't described as direct support.)
Since various members contact their LNC Region Reps for member
related
issues, I'd like to be on the Membership Support Committee, and
would
like to have the committee composition comprised of four LNC
members.
In addition, I'd expand the non-LNC members and add two more than
proposed, making the non-LNC members five. Small committees
sometimes
have several people unable to make a meeting, even when online, and
when
there's only seven people, and two are missing, it's hard to come to
a
meaningful agreement, as so few are represented. Also, since we do
have
such an abundance of LP members wishing to help, expanding the
non-LNC
members number would help our members, as there'd be a larger pool
of
people would to assist.
For the reasons mentioned above, I'd like to see the Membership
Support
Committee have nine people, four LNC members, and five non-LNC
members.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On 2018-08-26 13:59, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
> Much much better. I have a question though - why so many LNC
members?
> We are stretched thin and there are many many members who want
to
> help. I would like to see committees - particularly ones with
> absolutely no budget - to be member ran with the composition of
that
> committee approved by the LNC not just the LNC chair (if we
reduced
> the
> LNC membership of the committee - if kept as it is right now,
only
> approval by the Chair is necessary).
> The Historical Committee - which actually HAS a budget has NO
> required
> LNC members. Why are we not moving towards that model?
> tldr; I am likely to vote against if the number of LNC members
is
> not
> reduced. We can always volunteer to be appointed. I would
like to
> see
> NO required LNC members.
> ************
>
> ==
>
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 10:49 AM Alex Merced (LNC Vice Chair)
via
> Lnc-business <[4][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> Below is the newer wording for what used to be the
> Retention/Outreach
> committee motion. I have simplified the motion based on
what I
> saw on
> the email ballots of committee motions from previous LNC
terms.
> My intention is to create a committee that want to help
provide
> some
> extra hands to the staff in Membership related tasks and
fact
> finding
> (making thank you calls/emails). Since this can be quite a
wide
> range
> of activities I chose to not define them within the motion
so
> the
> committee chair or the committee can coordinate with the
> Membership
> Manager and other staff on how they can be helpful.
> -------------------------
> Membership Support Committee
> Create a Membership Support Committee consisting of four
LNC
> members or
> LNC alternates and three non-LNC members of the LP. The
LNC
> members of
> the committee are elected by the LNC and the non-LNC
members
> are
> appointed by the LNC Chair based on recommendations from
the
> LNC
> members of the committee. The LNC Chair will appoint an
> Interim
> Chair
> of the Membership Support Committee until a permanent
Chair can
> be
> elected by its' members.
> The Membership Support Committee will seek to find ways to
> support LP
> staff in matters of membership growth and retention. The
> committee
> will submit a report of its activities at the 2nd and 4th
LNC
> meetings
> each year.
> Alex Merced
> Vice Chair of the Libertarian National Committee/LP
>
>
--
References
1. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
2. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blocked.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 118 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20180826/dde8e5ed/attachment.gif>
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list