[Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
Joe Bishop-Henchman
joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
Sat Jul 21 10:04:34 EDT 2018
Given that the LNC voted against acknowledging the election of the top
7, I wouldn't consider the Secretary's promise to adopt anything
submitted by the top 7 to be appropriate action. But since it wouldn't
have the endorsement of the LNC either, it would be a renegade action.
The motion to acknowledge the top 7 got only 6 yes votes. Unless 3
people who voted no or abstained indicate that they would now vote yes,
we are re-treading the same ground with nothing to show for it.
Equity is the application of the common law for resolving disputes
between parties. It's not a magic term for avoiding bylaws and rules in
political party governance.
JBH
On Jul 21, 2018 4:56 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
<lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
If the JC sends me amended appellate rules I will direct the staff
to post
them absent a contrary directive from the Chair or a contrary motion
from
the LNC.
There is no way the delegates intended to leave themselves without a
watchdog. This is a matter of member rights and when I was regional
I
clearly told my Region that there was a big BUT to my
representation. I
would never advocate against my own principles (not merely opinion)
or
removing member rights.
-Caryn Ann
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:20 AM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> JP> On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find the
arguments
> of rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all the
time
> about changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem,
but when
> it comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems sort
of
> hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
> I don't understand how some Libertarians want to tell society
that many
> things will work much better managed by voluntary agreements
rather
> than by government, but then don't care about the terms of the
> voluntary agreement that is our organizational rules. If we
won't
> follow our own agreements, that feels hypocritical to me, and
it sets a
> poor example for the product we're trying to sell.
> -Alicia
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:26 AM, john.phillips--- via
Lnc-business
> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> Shrug. If I wanted to take it to a court of law I would
have a
> 50/50
> shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at
it. Some
> of
> them thought they could win maybe 70%.
> So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as
good as
> the
> argument against.
> However, the vast majority seem to want them from what I
see, so
> I fail
> to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just
accept it
> and
> move on, it is what we should have done from the
beginning.
> On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find the
> arguments of
> rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all
the time
> about
> changing bad laws and rules that have created a problem,
but when
> it
> comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems
sort of
> hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
> So my stance is this. I stand opposed to anything that
continues
> to
> drag this out. I stand opposed to anything other than
accepting
> the
> recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to me
to be
> the will
> of vast majority of our constituents. The correct route
in my
> not so
> humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out of
the
> way,
> move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC
didn't.
> John Phillips
> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
> Cell [1]217-412-5973
> ------ Original message------
> From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
> Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
> To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
> Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[2];[2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
> Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
> They can disagree all they want. But, there's no authority
for
> them.
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> On [3]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> > There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> >
> >> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Elizabeth Van Horn
> >>
> >> On [4]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
wrote:
> >>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve - it
is up
> to the
> >>> membership to complain about that if they wish. I submit
we
> simply
> >>> go
> >>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> >>> -Caryn Ann
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth via
> Lnc-business
>
> >>> <[1[5]][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix. If
> >>> not,
> >>> could
> >>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that discussion
and
> >>> simply
> >>> not having a JC or what are the next points of discussion?
I
> >>> want
> >>> to
> >>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move forward.
I
> >>> abstained
> >>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
> >>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state chairs
put
> >>> very
> >>> simply:
> >>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be detrimental
and
> >>> don't
> >>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody is
> >>> going
> >>> to be
> >>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of the
> >>> first
> >>> true
> >>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> >>> We need to resolve and move forward.
> >>> Richard
> >>> --
> >>> Richard Longstreth
> >>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI,
UT,
> >>> WA,
> >>> WY)
> >>> Libertarian National Committee
>
> >>> [1][2[6]][4]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>> [7]931.538.9300
> >>> References
> >>> 1. mailto:[3[8]][5]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> --
> >>> In Liberty,
> >>> Caryn Ann Harlos
> >>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
> >>> - [4][9]Caryn.Ann.[10] Harlos at LP.org or[11]
Secretary at LP.org.
> >>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[12]
LPedia at LP.org
> >>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >>> We defend your rights
> >>> And oppose the use of force
> >>> Taxation is theft
> >>>
> >>> References
> >>>
> >>> 1. mailto[13]:[6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> >>> 2. mailto[14]:[7]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>> 3. mailto[15]:[8]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >>> 4. mailto[16]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> > --
> >
> > --
> >
> > IN LIBERTY,
> > CARYN ANN HARLOS
> > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary -
> [17]Caryn.Ann
> .[18] Harlos at LP.org or[19] Secretary at LP.org.
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[20]
LPedia at LP.org
> >
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > _We defend your rights_
> > _And oppose the use of force_
> > _Taxation is theft_
> They can disagree all they want. But, there's no
authority for
> them.
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> On [21]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> There's a JC presently electing its chair that disagrees.
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
> <[1[22]][9]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> On [23]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via
Lnc-business
> wrote:
> > It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve -
it is
> up to
> the
> > membership to complain about that if they wish. I
submit
> we
> simply
> > go
> > on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> > -Caryn Ann
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth
via
> Lnc-business
>
> > <[1][2[24]][10]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> >
> > I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in
Phoenix.
> If
> > not,
> > could
> > we please add it? If not, are we done with that
> discussion
> and
> > simply
> > not having a JC or what are the next points of
> discussion?
> I
> > want
> > to
> > fully resolve this issue the best we can and
move
> forward.
> I
> > abstained
> > last vote to approve but my mind is still not
settled.
> > There is no good solution here, but one of may
state
> chairs put
> > very
> > simply:
> > "I find this whole debacle with process to be
> detrimental
> and
> > don't
> > really care one way or the other how it pans
out. Nobody
> is
> > going
> > to be
> > 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on
some of
> the
> > first
> > true
> > membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> > We need to resolve and move forward.
> > Richard
> > --
> > Richard Longstreth
> > Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM,
OR, HI,
> UT,
> > WA,
> > WY)
> > Libertarian National Committee
>
> > [1][2][3[25]][11]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > [26]931.538.9300
> > References
> > 1.
mailto:[3][4[27]][12]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> >
> > --
> > --
> > In Liberty,
> > Caryn Ann Harlos
> > Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
Committee
> Secretary
> > - [4][28]Caryn.Ann.[29] Harlos at LP.org or[30]
> Secretary at LP.org.
> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[31]
> LPedia at LP.org
> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> > We defend your rights
> > And oppose the use of force
> > Taxation is theft
> >
> > References
> >
> > 1. mailto:[5[32]][13]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> > 2. mailto:[6[33]][14]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > 3. mailto:[7[34]][15]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> > 4. mailto:[8[35]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
> - [9][36]Caryn.Ann.[37] Harlos at LP.org or[38]
Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[39]
LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
> References
> 1. mailto[40]:[16]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 2. mailto[41]:[17]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. mailto[42]:[18]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 4. mailto[43]:[19]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 5. mailto[44]:[20]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 6. mailto[45]:[21]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 7. mailto[46]:[22]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 8. mailto[47]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 9. mailto[48]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> References
> 1. tel:217-412-5973
> 2. mailto:;[23]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. tel:2018-07-20 11
> 4. tel:2018-07-20 08
> 5. mailto:][24]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 6. mailto:][25]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 7. tel:931.538.9300
> 8. mailto:][26]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 9. [27]http://Caryn.An/
> 10. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 11. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 12. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 13. mailto::[28]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 14. mailto::[29]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 15. mailto::[30]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 16. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 17. [31]http://Caryn.An/
> 18. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 19. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 20. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 21. tel:2018-07-20 11
> 22. mailto:][32]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 23. tel:2018-07-20 08
> 24. mailto:][33]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 25. mailto:][34]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 26. tel:931.538.9300
> 27. mailto:][35]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 28. [36]http://Caryn.An/
> 29. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 30. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 31. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 32. mailto:][37]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 33. mailto:][38]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 34. mailto:][39]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 35. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 36. [40]http://Caryn.An/
> 37. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
> 38. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
> 39. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
> 40. mailto::[41]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 41. mailto::[42]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 42. mailto::[43]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 43. mailto::[44]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 44. mailto::[45]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 45. mailto::[46]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 46. mailto::[47]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 47. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> 48. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 4. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 5. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 7. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 8. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 9. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 10. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 11. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 12. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 13. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 14. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 15. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 16. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 17. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 18. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 19. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 20. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 21. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 22. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 23. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 24. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 25. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 26. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 27. http://Caryn.An/
> 28. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 29. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 30. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 31. http://Caryn.An/
> 32. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 33. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 34. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 35. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 36. http://Caryn.An/
> 37. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 38. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 39. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 40. http://Caryn.An/
> 41. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
> 42. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 43. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 44. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 45. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 46. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 47. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
--
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary -
Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org> or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
If the JC sends me amended appellate rules I will direct the
staff to
post them absent a contrary directive from the Chair or a
contrary
motion from the LNC.
There is no way the delegates intended to leave themselves
without a
watchdog. This is a matter of member rights and when I was
regional I
clearly told my Region that there was a big BUT to my
representation.
I would never advocate against my own principles (not merely
opinion)
or removing member rights.
-Caryn Ann
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:20 AM Alicia Mattson via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
JP> On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find
the
arguments
of rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all
the
time
about changing bad laws and rules that have created a
problem,
but when
it comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems
sort of
hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
I don't understand how some Libertarians want to tell
society
that many
things will work much better managed by voluntary agreements
rather
than by government, but then don't care about the terms of
the
voluntary agreement that is our organizational rules. If we
won't
follow our own agreements, that feels hypocritical to me,
and it
sets a
poor example for the product we're trying to sell.
-Alicia
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:26 AM, john.phillips--- via
Lnc-business
<[1][2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Shrug. If I wanted to take it to a court of law I
would
have a
50/50
shot imho, and that of the 8 lawyers I asked to look at
it.
Some
of
them thought they could win maybe 70%.
So i would say the argument for them being the JC is as
good
as
the
argument against.
However, the vast majority seem to want them from what
I
see, so
I fail
to see the issue that people keep making of this. Just
accept it
and
move on, it is what we should have done from the
beginning.
On a personal note. Are we not Libertarians? I find
the
arguments of
rules and legality disturbingly dogmatic. We argue all
the
time
about
changing bad laws and rules that have created a
problem, but
when
it
comes down to our rules failing we can't adjust? Seems
sort
of
hypocritical to me, actually far more than sort of.
So my stance is this. I stand opposed to anything that
continues
to
drag this out. I stand opposed to anything other than
accepting
the
recommendation of the previous JC and what appears to
me to
be
the will
of vast majority of our constituents. The correct
route in
my
not so
humble opinion is that we accept them, get the hell out
of
the
way,
move on, and hope we don't need them like the last LNC
didn't.
John Phillips
Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
Cell [1]217-412-5973
------ Original message------
From: Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:32 AM
To: Caryn Ann Harlos;
Cc: Elizabeth Van Horn[2];[2][3]lnc-business at hq.lp.org;
Subject:Re: [Lnc-business] Agenda in Phoenix
They can disagree all they want. But, there's no
authority
for
them.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On [3]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
> There's a JC presently electing its chair that
disagrees.
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
wrote:
>
>> There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
>>
>> ---
>> Elizabeth Van Horn
>>
>> On [4]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via
Lnc-business
wrote:
>>> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve -
it is
up
to the
>>> membership to complain about that if they wish. I
submit
we
simply
>>> go
>>> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
>>> -Caryn Ann
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard Longstreth
via
Lnc-business
>>> <[1[5]][3][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item in Phoenix.
If
>>> not,
>>> could
>>> we please add it? If not, are we done with that
discussion
and
>>> simply
>>> not having a JC or what are the next points of
discussion? I
>>> want
>>> to
>>> fully resolve this issue the best we can and move
forward. I
>>> abstained
>>> last vote to approve but my mind is still not settled.
>>> There is no good solution here, but one of may state
chairs
put
>>> very
>>> simply:
>>> "I find this whole debacle with process to be
detrimental and
>>> don't
>>> really care one way or the other how it pans out. Nobody
is
>>> going
>>> to be
>>> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock on some of
the
>>> first
>>> true
>>> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
>>> We need to resolve and move forward.
>>> Richard
>>> --
>>> Richard Longstreth
>>> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT, NM, OR, HI,
UT,
>>> WA,
>>> WY)
>>> Libertarian National Committee
>>> [1][2[6]][4][5]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> [7]931.538.9300
>>> References
>>> 1. mailto:[3[8]][5][6]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> In Liberty,
>>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
>>> - [4][9]Caryn.Ann.[10] Harlos at LP.org or[11]
Secretary at LP.org.
>>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[12]
LPedia at LP.org
>>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>>> We defend your rights
>>> And oppose the use of force
>>> Taxation is theft
>>>
>>> References
>>>
>>> 1. mailto[13]:[6][7]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>> 2. mailto[14]:[7][8]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> 3. mailto[15]:[8][9]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>>> 4. mailto[16]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> --
>
> --
>
> IN LIBERTY,
> CARYN ANN HARLOS
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary -
[17]Caryn.Ann
.[18] Harlos at LP.org or[19] Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[20]
LPedia at LP.org
>
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> _We defend your rights_
> _And oppose the use of force_
> _Taxation is theft_
They can disagree all they want. But, there's no
authority
for
them.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On [21]2018-07-20 11:08, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:
There's a JC presently electing its chair that
disagrees.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:24 AM Elizabeth Van Horn
<[1[22]][9][10]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
There's no JC, so no resolution can be made.
---
Elizabeth Van Horn
On [23]2018-07-20 08:58, Caryn Ann Harlos via
Lnc-business
wrote:
> It seems that the JC took it upon itself to resolve
- it
is
up to
the
> membership to complain about that if they wish.
I
submit
we
simply
> go
> on about our jobs and stay out of it.
> -Caryn Ann
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Richard
Longstreth
via
Lnc-business
> <[1][2[24]][10][11]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>
> I am assuming that JC will be an agenda item
in
Phoenix.
If
> not,
> could
> we please add it? If not, are we done with
that
discussion
and
> simply
> not having a JC or what are the next points
of
discussion?
I
> want
> to
> fully resolve this issue the best we can and
move
forward.
I
> abstained
> last vote to approve but my mind is still not
settled.
> There is no good solution here, but one of
may
state
chairs put
> very
> simply:
> "I find this whole debacle with process to be
detrimental
and
> don't
> really care one way or the other how it pans
out.
Nobody
is
> going
> to be
> 100% on this as is evidenced by the gridlock
on
some of
the
> first
> true
> membership affecting votes from the LNC."
> We need to resolve and move forward.
> Richard
> --
> Richard Longstreth
> Region 1 Representative (AK, AZ, CO, KS, MT,
NM,
OR, HI,
UT,
> WA,
> WY)
> Libertarian National Committee
>
[1][2][3[25]][11][12]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> [26]931.538.9300
> References
> 1.
mailto:[3][4[27]][12][13]richard.longstreth at lp.org
>
> --
> --
> In Liberty,
> Caryn Ann Harlos
> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
Committee
Secretary
> - [4][28]Caryn.Ann.[29] Harlos at LP.org or[30]
Secretary at LP.org.
> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
-[31]
LPedia at LP.org
> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> We defend your rights
> And oppose the use of force
> Taxation is theft
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[5[32]][13][14]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> 2.
mailto:[6[33]][14][15]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 3.
mailto:[7[34]][15][16]richard.longstreth at lp.org
> 4. mailto:[8[35]]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
Secretary
- [9][36]Caryn.Ann.[37] Harlos at LP.org or[38]
Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -[39]
LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto[40]:[16][17]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
2. mailto[41]:[17][18]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto[42]:[18][19]richard.longstreth at lp.org
4. mailto[43]:[19][20]richard.longstreth at lp.org
5. mailto[44]:[20][21]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. mailto[45]:[21][22]richard.longstreth at lp.org
7. mailto[46]:[22][23]richard.longstreth at lp.org
8. mailto[47]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
9. mailto[48]:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
References
1. tel:217-412-5973
2. mailto:;[23][24]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. tel:2018-07-20 11
4. tel:2018-07-20 08
5. mailto:][24][25]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
6. mailto:][25][26]richard.longstreth at lp.org
7. tel:931.538.9300
8. mailto:][26][27]richard.longstreth at lp.org
9. [27][28]http://Caryn.An/
10. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
11. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
12. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
13. mailto::[28][29]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
14. mailto::[29][30]richard.longstreth at lp.org
15. mailto::[30][31]richard.longstreth at lp.org
16. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
17. [31][32]http://Caryn.An/
18. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
19. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
20. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
21. tel:2018-07-20 11
22. mailto:][32][33]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
23. tel:2018-07-20 08
24. mailto:][33][34]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
25. mailto:][34][35]richard.longstreth at lp.org
26. tel:931.538.9300
27. mailto:][35][36]richard.longstreth at lp.org
28. [36][37]http://Caryn.An/
29. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
30. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
31. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
32. mailto:][37][38]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
33. mailto:][38][39]richard.longstreth at lp.org
34. mailto:][39][40]richard.longstreth at lp.org
35. mailto:]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
36. [40][41]http://Caryn.An/
37. mailto: Harlos at LP.org
38. mailto: Secretary at LP.org.
39. mailto: LPedia at LP.org
40. mailto::[41][42]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
41. mailto::[42][43]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
42. mailto::[43][44]richard.longstreth at lp.org
43. mailto::[44][45]richard.longstreth at lp.org
44. mailto::[45][46]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
45. mailto::[46][47]richard.longstreth at lp.org
46. mailto::[47][48]richard.longstreth at lp.org
47. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
48. mailto::Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
References
1. mailto:[49]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:[50]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto:[51]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. mailto:[52]richard.longstreth at lp.org
5. mailto:[53]richard.longstreth at lp.org
6. mailto:[54]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
7. mailto:[55]richard.longstreth at lp.org
8. mailto:[56]richard.longstreth at lp.org
9. mailto:[57]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
10. mailto:[58]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
11. mailto:[59]richard.longstreth at lp.org
12. mailto:[60]richard.longstreth at lp.org
13. mailto:[61]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
14. mailto:[62]richard.longstreth at lp.org
15. mailto:[63]richard.longstreth at lp.org
16. mailto:[64]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
17. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
18. mailto:[66]richard.longstreth at lp.org
19. mailto:[67]richard.longstreth at lp.org
20. mailto:[68]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
21. mailto:[69]richard.longstreth at lp.org
22. mailto:[70]richard.longstreth at lp.org
23. mailto:[71]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
24. mailto:[72]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
25. mailto:[73]richard.longstreth at lp.org
26. mailto:[74]richard.longstreth at lp.org
27. [75]http://Caryn.An/
28. mailto:[76]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
29. mailto:[77]richard.longstreth at lp.org
30. mailto:[78]richard.longstreth at lp.org
31. [79]http://Caryn.An/
32. mailto:[80]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
33. mailto:[81]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
34. mailto:[82]richard.longstreth at lp.org
35. mailto:[83]richard.longstreth at lp.org
36. [84]http://Caryn.An/
37. mailto:[85]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
38. mailto:[86]richard.longstreth at lp.org
39. mailto:[87]richard.longstreth at lp.org
40. [88]http://Caryn.An/
41. mailto:[89]elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
42. mailto:[90]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
43. mailto:[91]richard.longstreth at lp.org
44. mailto:[92]richard.longstreth at lp.org
45. mailto:[93]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
46. mailto:[94]richard.longstreth at lp.org
47. mailto:[95]richard.longstreth at lp.org
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
- [96]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
3. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
5. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
6. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
7. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
8. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
9. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
10. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
11. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
12. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
13. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
14. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
15. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
16. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
17. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
18. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
19. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
20. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
21. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
22. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
23. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
24. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
25. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
26. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
27. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
28. http://Caryn.An/
29. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
30. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
31. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
32. http://Caryn.An/
33. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
34. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
35. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
36. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
37. http://Caryn.An/
38. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
39. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
40. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
41. http://Caryn.An/
42. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
43. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
44. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
45. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
46. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
47. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
48. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
49. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
50. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
51. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
52. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
53. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
54. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
55. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
56. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
57. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
58. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
59. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
60. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
61. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
62. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
63. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
64. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
66. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
67. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
68. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
69. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
70. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
71. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
72. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
73. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
74. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
75. http://Caryn.An/
76. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
77. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
78. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
79. http://Caryn.An/
80. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
81. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
82. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
83. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
84. http://Caryn.An/
85. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
86. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
87. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
88. http://Caryn.An/
89. mailto:elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org
90. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
91. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
92. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
93. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
94. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
95. mailto:richard.longstreth at lp.org
96. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list