[Lnc-business] Hubbub email chain length for 134-member LNC

[Elizabeth Van Horn]

*laughing out loud!*    I meant 50 one per state.  See?  It's even
better!   

---
Elizabeth Van Horn

On 2018-01-15 00:37, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:

> How is one per state = 100? 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn <elizabeth.vanhorn at lp.org> wrote:
> I think expanding to one representative per state, for a total of 100 members, would be a plus.  (I know that's not what the bylaws people want.)
> 
> Because, it would be easier to get feedback from the members.  The actual people we represent.
> 
> Then some posting rules could be in place, such as no burdening the rest of the LNC with personal rambles and dreams.
> 
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn 
> 
> On 2018-01-15 00:17, david.demarest at lp.org wrote:
> 
> Can you imagine the length of this bruhaha email chain if the bylaws
> committee proposal to expand the the LNC to 134 members was already in
> place. It boggles the imagination.
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business [1] _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business [1]

_______________________________________________
Lnc-business mailing list
Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business 

Links:
------
[1] http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hq.lp.org/pipermail/lnc-business/attachments/20180115/8971a210/attachment-0002.html>