[Lnc-business] Motion to Censure

Starchild starchild at lp.org
Fri Jan 19 22:25:28 EST 2018


	Although I oppose the motion to remove Arvin Vohra as vice chair (but might support a well-written censure motion that makes it clear this is not a statement opposing radical libertarianism), I think Caryn Ann is correct on this bylaws point.

Love & Liberty,
                                  
                                   ((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                                 starchild at lp.org
                                 (415) 625-FREE


On Jan 19, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:

>   I quote our Bylaws:
> 
>   ARTICLE 2: PURPOSES
> 
>   The Party is organized to implement and give voice to the principles
>   embodied in the Statement of Principles by: functioning as a
>   libertarian political entity separate and distinct from all other
>   political parties or movements; moving public policy in a libertarian
>   direction by building a political party that elects Libertarians to
>   public office; chartering affiliate parties throughout the United
>   States and promoting their growth and activities; nominating candidates
>   for President and Vice-President of the United States, and supporting
>   Party and affiliate party candidates for political office; and,
>   entering into public information activities.
> 
>   That Bylaw defines our purpose and it DOES NOT say what this Motion
>   says "is primary."  We have ONE purpose.: to implement and give voice
>   to the principles embodied in the Statement of Principles with MANY
>   EQUAL ways to do so.
> 
>   On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>   <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> 
>   Further the motion is contrary to our Bylaws and thus out of order.
>   I challenge the motion on those grounds and ask for a ruling of the
>   Chair.
>   We cannot in motions redefine the primary purpose of the Party which is
>   NOT that and was VOTED DOWN last convention.
>   On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:54 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
>   <[2]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> 
>   Because Region 1 so far wants suspension. I will not have their rights
>   gamed away like this.
> 
>   On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:53 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
>   <[3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
> 
>   I don’t consider it adequate and this seems like an end run around
>   other members when the fair thing is to add this to the electronic
>   call.
> 
>   Colour me not particularly pleased.  Everyone should have a chance to
>   argue their case.
> 
>   Please don’t force my hand to co-sponsor the other one in order to
>   protect Region 1’s rights.
> 
>   On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:02 PM Daniel Hayes <[4]daniel.hayes at lp.org>
>   wrote:
> 
>     Alicia, what would be the end date on this ballot?
>     Daniel
>     Sent from my iPhone
>> On Jan 19, 2018, at 7:50 PM, Alicia Mattson
>     <[5]alicia.mattson at lp.org> wrote:
>> 
>>  Since there are already a sufficient number of people requesting
>     an
>>  electronic meeting, but they're hammering out the meeting
>     date/time
>>  still, why not just add this to the call of the meeting and
>     handle it
>>  at the same time?  Otherwise we're going to have overlapping
>     subjects,
>>  one by email ballot and one by electronic meeting.
>>  -Alicia
>> 
>>  On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Jeff Hewitt
>     <[1][6]jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>     Move to censure LNC Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra for repeated
>     comments
>>  made
>>     on social media that are inflammatory and destructive to the
>>  building
>>     of a competent political entity whose primary function is to
>     draw
>>     people to libertarian ideas and to elect Libertarian
>     candidates to
>>     office.
>>     Jeff Hewitt
>>     LNC Region 4 Representive
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Lnc-business mailing list
>>    [2][7]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>    [3][8]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> 
>> References
>> 
>>  1. mailto:[9]jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org
>>  2. mailto:[10]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>  3. [11]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lnc-business mailing list
>> [12]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> [13]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>     _______________________________________________
>     Lnc-business mailing list
>     [14]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>     [15]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> 
> References
> 
>   1. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>   2. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>   3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>   4. mailto:daniel.hayes at lp.org
>   5. mailto:alicia.mattson at lp.org
>   6. mailto:jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org
>   7. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>   8. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>   9. mailto:jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org
>  10. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  11. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  12. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  13. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>  14. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>  15. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
> _______________________________________________
> Lnc-business mailing list
> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business

-------------- next part --------------
    Although I oppose the motion to remove Arvin Vohra as vice chair (but
   might support a well-written censure motion that makes it clear this is
   not a statement opposing radical libertarianism), I think Caryn Ann is
   correct on this bylaws point.

   Love & Liberty,

                                      ((( starchild )))
   At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
                                    [1]starchild at lp.org
                                    (415) 625-FREE

   On Jan 19, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos wrote:

     I quote our Bylaws:
     ARTICLE 2: PURPOSES
     The Party is organized to implement and give voice to the principles
     embodied in the Statement of Principles by: functioning as a
     libertarian political entity separate and distinct from all other
     political parties or movements; moving public policy in a libertarian
     direction by building a political party that elects Libertarians to
     public office; chartering affiliate parties throughout the United
     States and promoting their growth and activities; nominating
   candidates
     for President and Vice-President of the United States, and supporting
     Party and affiliate party candidates for political office; and,
     entering into public information activities.
     That Bylaw defines our purpose and it DOES NOT say what this Motion
     says "is primary."  We have ONE purpose.: to implement and give voice
     to the principles embodied in the Statement of Principles with MANY
     EQUAL ways to do so.
     On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
     <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
     Further the motion is contrary to our Bylaws and thus out of order.
     I challenge the motion on those grounds and ask for a ruling of the
     Chair.
     We cannot in motions redefine the primary purpose of the Party which
   is
     NOT that and was VOTED DOWN last convention.
     On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:54 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
     <[2]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
     Because Region 1 so far wants suspension. I will not have their
   rights
     gamed away like this.
     On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:53 PM Caryn Ann Harlos
     <[3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
     I don�t consider it adequate and this seems like an end run around
     other members when the fair thing is to add this to the electronic
     call.
     Colour me not particularly pleased.  Everyone should have a chance to
     argue their case.
     Please don�t force my hand to co-sponsor the other one in order to
     protect Region 1�s rights.
     On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:02 PM Daniel Hayes <[4]daniel.hayes at lp.org>
     wrote:
       Alicia, what would be the end date on this ballot?
       Daniel
       Sent from my iPhone

     On Jan 19, 2018, at 7:50 PM, Alicia Mattson

       <[5]alicia.mattson at lp.org> wrote:

      Since there are already a sufficient number of people requesting

       an

      electronic meeting, but they're hammering out the meeting

       date/time

      still, why not just add this to the call of the meeting and

       handle it

      at the same time?  Otherwise we're going to have overlapping

       subjects,

      one by email ballot and one by electronic meeting.

      -Alicia

      On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Jeff Hewitt

       <[1][6]jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org>

      wrote:

         Move to censure LNC Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra for repeated

       comments

      made

         on social media that are inflammatory and destructive to the

      building

         of a competent political entity whose primary function is to

       draw

         people to libertarian ideas and to elect Libertarian

       candidates to

         office.

         Jeff Hewitt

         LNC Region 4 Representive

        _______________________________________________

        Lnc-business mailing list

        [2][7]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org

        [3][8]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business

     References

      1. mailto:[9]jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org

      2. mailto:[10]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org

      3. [11]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business

     _______________________________________________

     Lnc-business mailing list

     [12]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org

     [13]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business

       _______________________________________________
       Lnc-business mailing list
       [14]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
       [15]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
   References
     1. [2]mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
     2. [3]mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
     3. [4]mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
     4. [5]mailto:daniel.hayes at lp.org
     5. [6]mailto:alicia.mattson at lp.org
     6. [7]mailto:jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org
     7. [8]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     8. [9]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
     9. [10]mailto:jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org
    10. [11]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
    11. [12]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
    12. [13]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
    13. [14]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
    14. [15]mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
    15. [16]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
   _______________________________________________
   Lnc-business mailing list
   [17]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business

References

   1. mailto:starchild at lp.org
   2. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   4. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   5. mailto:daniel.hayes at lp.org
   6. mailto:alicia.mattson at lp.org
   7. mailto:jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org
   8. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   9. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  10. mailto:jeffrey.hewitt at lp.org
  11. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  12. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  13. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  14. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  15. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
  16. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
  17. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list