[Lnc-business] Motion to suspend for cause

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

Well as it has gotten late, and the other voting already started, Alicia I
will co-sponsor your motion.

I ask Elizabeth and Patrick to do likewise.

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org>
wrote:

> Alicia, I need to read over it a few more times, but if the e-meeting is
> not called, I will either be joining you on this proposed motion or
> proposing a modified wording.  I hope the other co-sponsors will join.
> Region 1 wants suspension to be heard.  They. with me, at least in a
> majority, think that censure might actually be worse than nothing.  Their
> primary choice is suspension.
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
> > wrote:
>
>> Alicia, a member would like to know what specific quotes are being
>> referred to in the intent to cause division clause.  I absolutely agree
>> that is the case, and that it is a cumulative case, but I would like to
>> know if you have a specific one in mind.  I am attending a LPWA meeting
>> tomorrow to be on hand to answer questions for them, and a LPWA member
>> asked this.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <
>> caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> That wording at first read is agreeable to me.  I am still waiting word
>>> from a few state chairs.  I will pass along this suggested language to them.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Alicia Mattson <agmattson at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>    If the censure email ballot means we're not going to have an
>>>> electronic
>>>>    meeting, then I want us to still be able to consider both censure and
>>>>    suspension.
>>>>    Since the Platform references in my previous draft were not agreeable
>>>>    to all the potential supporters of a motion for suspension, I'll ask
>>>>    for co-sponsors for the following instead.
>>>>    -Alicia
>>>>    -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ------------
>>>>    --------------------------------
>>>>    Whereas, Bylaw Article 6.7 states that the National Committee may,
>>>> for
>>>>    cause, suspend any officer by a vote of 2/3 of the entire National
>>>>    Committee;
>>>>    Whereas, Vice Chair Arvin Vohra’s public discourse has repeatedly
>>>>    included inflammatory and insulting remarks which bring the Party,
>>>> its
>>>>    candidates, and its principles into disrepute;
>>>>    Whereas Mr. Vohra’s remarks have destructively stereotyped party
>>>>    members and large segments of the population, a behavior completely
>>>> at
>>>>    odds with our Party’s philosophy of recognizing and treating people
>>>> as
>>>>    individuals;
>>>>    Whereas, Mr. Vohra’s stated intent is to cause internal division, and
>>>>    his comments have caused wide-spread offense; and
>>>>    Whereas, the result is that the LNC, its committees, and Party
>>>>    affiliates are distracted from productive activities;
>>>>    Therefore, be it resolved, that the Libertarian National Committee
>>>>    suspends Arvin Vohra for cause from his position as LNC Vice Chair;
>>>> and
>>>>    Furthermore, we disavow and repudiate Mr. Vohra’s comments as being
>>>>    unrepresentative of the Libertarian National Committee.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lnc-business mailing list
>>>> Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>>> http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
   Well as it has gotten late, and the other voting already started,
   Alicia I will co-sponsor your motion.
   I ask Elizabeth and Patrick to do likewise.

   On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
   <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:

   Alicia, I need to read over it a few more times, but if the e-meeting
   is not called, I will either be joining you on this proposed motion or
   proposing a modified wording.  I hope the other co-sponsors will join.
   Region 1 wants suspension to be heard.  They. with me, at least in a
   majority, think that censure might actually be worse than nothing.
   Their primary choice is suspension.

   On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos
   <[2]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:

   Alicia, a member would like to know what specific quotes are being
   referred to in the intent to cause division clause.  I absolutely agree
   that is the case, and that it is a cumulative case, but I would like to
   know if you have a specific one in mind.  I am attending a LPWA meeting
   tomorrow to be on hand to answer questions for them, and a LPWA member
   asked this.

   On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
   <[3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:

   That wording at first read is agreeable to me.  I am still waiting word
   from a few state chairs.  I will pass along this suggested language to
   them.

   On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Alicia Mattson
   <[4]agmattson at gmail.com> wrote:

      If the censure email ballot means we're not going to have an
   electronic
      meeting, then I want us to still be able to consider both censure
   and
      suspension.
      Since the Platform references in my previous draft were not
   agreeable
      to all the potential supporters of a motion for suspension, I'll ask
      for co-sponsors for the following instead.
      -Alicia
      -----------------------------------------------------------
   ------------
      --------------------------------
      Whereas, Bylaw Article 6.7 states that the National Committee may,
   for
      cause, suspend any officer by a vote of 2/3 of the entire National
      Committee;
      Whereas, Vice Chair Arvin Vohra’s public discourse has repeatedly
      included inflammatory and insulting remarks which bring the Party,
   its
      candidates, and its principles into disrepute;
      Whereas Mr. Vohra’s remarks have destructively stereotyped party
      members and large segments of the population, a behavior completely
   at
      odds with our Party’s philosophy of recognizing and treating people
   as
      individuals;
      Whereas, Mr. Vohra’s stated intent is to cause internal division,
   and
      his comments have caused wide-spread offense; and
      Whereas, the result is that the LNC, its committees, and Party
      affiliates are distracted from productive activities;
      Therefore, be it resolved, that the Libertarian National Committee
      suspends Arvin Vohra for cause from his position as LNC Vice Chair;
   and
      Furthermore, we disavow and repudiate Mr. Vohra’s comments as being
      unrepresentative of the Libertarian National Committee.

     _______________________________________________
     Lnc-business mailing list
     [5]Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
     [6]http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business

References

   1. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   2. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   4. mailto:agmattson at gmail.com
   5. mailto:Lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   6. http://hq.lp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lnc-business