[Lnc-business] Note about our electronic meeting

[Joshua Katz]

Can you explain exactly what the objection is?  I don't the book in front
of me, but I do not recall any statement in RONR about voting on censure.

Joshua A. Katz


On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org>
wrote:

>    Oh I know.  This is an informal question in order to learn.
>    Without being binding - and even if raised then no result would be
>    changed - does anyone have any thoughts?  If I’m mistaken can someone
>    explain to me?
>    This is simply an effort to further master RONR not to start a
>    controversy or rehash a settled vote.
>    On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:11 AM Nicholas Sarwark <[1]chair at lp.org>
>    wrote:
>
>      Points of order need to be made at the time.
>      We are no longer at the time.
>      -Nick
>      On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>      <[2]carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
>      >    I think we made an error.  It doesn't affect the outcome but I
>      have
>      >    seen members comment on this (and big surprise, there are a
>      vocal few
>      >    who are seeing a conspiracy in it) but I don't think Arvin
>      should have
>      >    been allowed to vote on the censure motion.
>      >    Our Bylaws supersede RONR on suspension (and I think our Bylaws
>      are
>      >    flawed there but it is what it is) but do not supersede RONR on
>      >    censure.
>      >    Thus I think it was in order for Arvin to vote on suspension
>      but not in
>      >    order for him to vote on censure.
>      >    Thoughts?
>      >    --
>      >    In Liberty,
>      >    Caryn Ann Harlos
>      >    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
>      (Alaska,
>      >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
>      Washington)
>      >    - [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>      >    Communications Director, [2]Libertarian Party of Colorado
>      >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
>      >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>      >    We defend your rights
>      >    And oppose the use of force
>      >    Taxation is theft
>      >
>      > References
>      >
>      >    1. mailto:[3]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>      >    2. [4]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>
> References
>
>    1. mailto:chair at lp.org
>    2. mailto:carynannharlos at gmail.com
>    3. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>    4. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
   Can you explain exactly what the objection is?  I don't the book in
   front of me, but I do not recall any statement in RONR about voting on
   censure.

   Joshua A. Katz
   On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Caryn Ann Harlos
   <[1]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:

        Oh I know.  This is an informal question in order to learn.
        Without being binding - and even if raised then no result would
     be
        changed - does anyone have any thoughts?  If I’m mistaken can
     someone
        explain to me?
        This is simply an effort to further master RONR not to start a
        controversy or rehash a settled vote.
        On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:11 AM Nicholas Sarwark
     <[1][2]chair at lp.org>
        wrote:
          Points of order need to be made at the time.
          We are no longer at the time.
          -Nick
          On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos

        <[2][3]carynannharlos at gmail.com> wrote:
        >    I think we made an error.  It doesn't affect the outcome but
   I
        have
        >    seen members comment on this (and big surprise, there are a
        vocal few
        >    who are seeing a conspiracy in it) but I don't think Arvin
        should have
        >    been allowed to vote on the censure motion.
        >    Our Bylaws supersede RONR on suspension (and I think our
   Bylaws
        are
        >    flawed there but it is what it is) but do not supersede RONR
   on
        >    censure.
        >    Thus I think it was in order for Arvin to vote on suspension
        but not in
        >    order for him to vote on censure.
        >    Thoughts?
        >    --
        >    In Liberty,
        >    Caryn Ann Harlos
        >    Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee
        (Alaska,
        >    Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
        Washington)
        >    - [1]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
        >    Communications Director, [2]Libertarian Party of Colorado
        >    Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
        >    A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
        >    We defend your rights
        >    And oppose the use of force
        >    Taxation is theft
        >
        > References
        >

          >    1. mailto:[3]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
          >    2. [4][4]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
     References
        1. mailto:[5]chair at lp.org
        2. mailto:[6]carynannharlos at gmail.com
        3. mailto:[7]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
        4. [8]http://www.lpcolorado.org/

References

   1. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   2. mailto:chair at lp.org
   3. mailto:carynannharlos at gmail.com
   4. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
   5. mailto:chair at lp.org
   6. mailto:carynannharlos at gmail.com
   7. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
   8. http://www.lpcolorado.org/