[Lnc-business] Motion with previous notice

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

Also Tim, no Oxford comma.  #triggered

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Tim Hagan <tim.hagan at lp.org> wrote:

> I cannot support this motion as written.
> "it's" is the contraction of "it is" or "it has".
> "its" is the possessive form of the neuter pronoun.
> Then there's the matter of the motion not using the Oxford comma.
>
> Does the third part of the motion, the implementation phase, involve
> budget concerns or staff time?
>
> I'm concerned about including the open-ended phrase "and more" in what the
> committee can do.
>
> ---
> Tim Hagan
> Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee
>
>
> On 2018-03-01 16:51, Arvin Vohra wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>    On behalf of Michael Heise, I will be making a motion to create a
>>    Blockchain Committee at the next LNC meeting.
>>    -- Statement of Purpose This committee is being founded to serve 3
>>    purposes:
>>    1. To research blockchain technology and explore it’s potential use and
>>    implementation to solve problems or inefficiency within the Libertarian
>>    Party and how it conducts business and other party functions.
>>    2. To consult/advise with Bloggers, Podcasters, Crypto-currency project
>>    teams members, miners, whales and other related parties to explore how
>>    the Libertarian Party can become more attractive to the
>>    cryptocurrency/blockchain community.
>>    3. To create and promote cross platform promotion and education of the
>>    libertarian party, libertarianism, cryptocurrencies and blockchain
>>    technologies. Potential examples include having crypto-related speakers
>>    at libertarian/ party events, have libertarian party members, including
>>    candidates, at crypto-related events, creating a streamlined
>>    crypto-training procedure for interested candidates, and more
>>    I will also support this motion. To defeat the state and it's two
>>    puppet parties, we have to outthink and outstrategize them. We cannot
>>    limit ourselves to playing by their rules. Using a combination of
>>    political, technological, cultural, and individual choice
>>    libertarianism is, in my view, the strategically superior approach.
>>    Arvin Vohra
>>    [1]www.VoteVohra.com
>>    [2]VoteVohra at gmail.com
>>    (301) 320-3634
>>
>> References
>>
>>    1. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
>>    2. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
   Also Tim, no Oxford comma.  #triggered

   On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Tim Hagan <[1]tim.hagan at lp.org> wrote:

     I cannot support this motion as written.
     "it's" is the contraction of "it is" or "it has".
     "its" is the possessive form of the neuter pronoun.
     Then there's the matter of the motion not using the Oxford comma.
     Does the third part of the motion, the implementation phase, involve
     budget concerns or staff time?
     I'm concerned about including the open-ended phrase "and more" in
     what the committee can do.
     ---
     Tim Hagan
     Treasurer, Libertarian National Committee

   On 2018-03-01 16:51, Arvin Vohra wrote:

     Hi All,
        On behalf of Michael Heise, I will be making a motion to create a
        Blockchain Committee at the next LNC meeting.
        -- Statement of Purpose This committee is being founded to serve
     3
        purposes:
        1. To research blockchain technology and explore it’s potential
     use and
        implementation to solve problems or inefficiency within the
     Libertarian
        Party and how it conducts business and other party functions.
        2. To consult/advise with Bloggers, Podcasters, Crypto-currency
     project
        teams members, miners, whales and other related parties to
     explore how
        the Libertarian Party can become more attractive to the
        cryptocurrency/blockchain community.
        3. To create and promote cross platform promotion and education
     of the
        libertarian party, libertarianism, cryptocurrencies and
     blockchain
        technologies. Potential examples include having crypto-related
     speakers
        at libertarian/ party events, have libertarian party members,
     including
        candidates, at crypto-related events, creating a streamlined
        crypto-training procedure for interested candidates, and more
        I will also support this motion. To defeat the state and it's two
        puppet parties, we have to outthink and outstrategize them. We
     cannot
        limit ourselves to playing by their rules. Using a combination of
        political, technological, cultural, and individual choice
        libertarianism is, in my view, the strategically superior
     approach.
        Arvin Vohra
        [1][2]www.VoteVohra.com
        [2][3]VoteVohra at gmail.com
        [4](301) 320-3634
     References
        1. [5]http://www.VoteVohra.com/
        2. mailto:[6]VoteVohra at gmail.com

References

   1. mailto:tim.hagan at lp.org
   2. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
   3. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com
   4. tel:(301) 320-3634
   5. http://www.VoteVohra.com/
   6. mailto:VoteVohra at gmail.com