[Lnc-business] Publishing links to candidate articles with some platform deviations

Caryn Ann Harlos caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Tue Mar 27 23:08:19 EDT 2018


I'm for fundraising by having a dunk tank with Daniel Hayes.  We would
raise a ton.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:04 PM, Daniel Hayes <daniel.hayes at lp.org> wrote:

> I’m for deleting the whole platform and rolling the omissions plank into
> the end of the SOP. But that’s a little out of the power of the LNC.
>
> Daniel Hayes
> LNC At Large Member
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 27, 2018, at 9:55 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos <caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >   This  is how we have done it successfully.  And the disclaimer can be
> >   done very politely and professionally that will not embarrass the
> >   candidate.  I would hope that candidates would make that disclaimer
> >   themselves.  Just as an activist I always clearly say when I deviate
> >   from an LP position or when it is unsettled (most notable example being
> >   abortion).
> >
> >   On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Joshua Katz
> >   <[1]planning4liberty at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >        Well, I'm clearly outnumbered, and it's situation-dependent, but
> >     as a
> >        general matter, I think I'd rather not do it than use a
> >     disclaimer (but
> >        I favor running things without the disclaimer, and if we can't do
> >     that,
> >        then just not running it - and, given our current system, I'm
> >     happy
> >        leaving that decision to the APRC and staff).  There are probably
> >        circumstances where I'm fine with the disclaimer, and
> >     circumstances
> >        where I'm less fine.
> >        Joshua A. Katz
> >        On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:08 PM, <[1][2]erin.adams at lp.org> wrote:
> >          I am comfortable with this
> >        On 2018-03-27 18:55, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
> >          I favor this method. As it allows for highlighting a candidate,
> >          while
> >          simultaneously alerting readers that the LP platform differs
> >          somewhat.
> >          ---
> >          Elizabeth Van Horn
> >          LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> >          Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> >          Chair-LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> >          Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> >          [2][3]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >          On 2018-03-27 15:14, Whitney Bilyeu wrote:
> >          What if we just ask staff to include in the blog post a
> >     disclaimer
> >          of
> >             sorts with any such link....acknowledging that there may be
> >          specific
> >             opinions held by the candidate that are not 100% our own...?
> >             Whitney
> >             On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Wes Benedict
> >          <[1][3][4]wes.benedict at lp.org>
> >
> >           wrote:
> >             Dear LNC:
> >             I'm bringing this to your attention now, because it has not
> >        been an
> >             issue for several months, but likely will come up again soon
> >        given
> >             that we have lots of candidates and will be writing lots of
> >        blog
> >             entries about candidates this year.
> >             Staff works to publish articles that comply with the LNC
> >   Bylaws
> >        and
> >             Policy Manual. The Advertising Publications and Review
> >        Committee is
> >             tasked with ensuring publications comply.
> >             I'd like to point out that I think Staff and the APRC have
> >   had
> >        a
> >             pretty good working relationship for at least 3 years and
> >        perhaps
> >             even longer than that if I think about it. So, this is not
> >        meant as
> >             a complaint in general about the APRC, Staff, or the overall
> >             procedures. Most things are fine in that area, in my opinion.
> >   I
> >        just
> >             want to focus on one issue.
> >             Nevertheless, it should come as no surprise that various
> >        members of
> >             the APRC and various staff don't always agree with each other
> >        on
> >             what constitutes a violation.
> >             A particular area of uncertainty has been articles with
> >        coverage of
> >             candidates where the articles include some positions that
> >        violate
> >             platform.
> >             I'll use public schools as a hypothetical, and the article
> >        below
> >             from the imaginary "Alexandria Beach Times."
> >             ====start article====
> >             [Sentence 1] John Doe, Libertarian candidate for Congress,
> >   says
> >        he
> >             wants to cut taxes, cut spending, end the war on drugs, and
> >        bring
> >             our troops home from overseas.
> >             [Sentence 2] When asked about public education, John Doe says
> >        "I'd
> >             like to use some of the savings from those cuts to increase
> >        spending
> >             on public schools."
> >             ====end article====
> >             I think most of the APRC and Staff would feel it's okay to
> >        write a
> >             blog and to quote Sentence 1 of the article above. Most of
> >   the
> >        APRC
> >             and Staff would probably feel it's NOT okay to quote Sentence
> >        2.
> >             The area of likely disagreement is whether or not we could
> >        include a
> >             link to the source article in our blog entry.
> >             If there was an article where 50% or more of the content
> >   about
> >        the
> >             Libertarian candidate had platform violations, probably most
> >   of
> >        us
> >             wouldn't want to publicize it.
> >             There can be a great article about one of our candidates
> >   where
> >        90%
> >             of the coverage is positive, but if 10% of the article
> >   includes
> >        a
> >             platform violation, we maybe should not link to it, or maybe
> >   we
> >             should.
> >             I used public school spending as an example above, but all
> >        kinds of
> >             things have come up in the past, such as opposing
> >   legalization
> >        of
> >             hard drugs (or letting the states decide on that), the Fair
> >        Tax,
> >             welfare, some regulations, and so on.
> >             I would like direction from the LNC on whether or not it is
> >        okay to
> >             publish things like blogs that links with some positions that
> >        might
> >             violate the platform.
> >             Based on feedback, I might float a suggest amendment to the
> >        Policy
> >             Manual for you all to consider at the upcoming LNC meeting.
> >
> >               I can work comfortabl[4]y with whichever direction the LNC
> >          might go on
> >               this particular issue, but I think it's an important
> >     enough
> >          issue
> >               that has come up quite a bit in the past, that it should
> >     be
> >               considered by the LNC.
> >               If the LNC prefers to leave the decision up to the APRC,
> >     that
> >          is
> >               another option I'm comfortable with. In fact, I think
> >     that's
> >          the
> >               status quo right now, however, given recent changes in the
> >          APRC, I
> >               could not tell you how they'd rule on the above issue.
> >               Thanks,
> >               --
> >               Wes Benedict, Executive Director
> >               Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
> >               [2]1444 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314
> >               [3][5][5](202) 333-0008 ext. 232,
> >     [4][6][6]wes.benedict at lp.org
> >               [5][7][7]facebook.com/libertarians @LPNational
> >               Join the Libertarian Party at:
> >     [6][8][8]http://lp.org/membership
> >          References
> >             1. mailto:[9][9]wes.benedict at lp.org
> >             2.
> >          [10][10]https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St.,+Alexandria,+
> >     VA+223
> >          14&entry=gmail&source=g
> >             3. tel:[11][11](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
> >             4. mailto:[12][12]wes.benedict at lp.org
> >             5. [13][13]http://facebook.com/libertarians
> >             6. [14][14]http://lp.org/membership
> >     References
> >        1. mailto:[15]erin.adams at lp.org
> >        2. [16]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >        3. mailto:[17]wes.benedict at lp.org
> >        4. [18]https://maps.google.com/?q=y+with+whichever+direction+the+
> >     LNC+&entry=gmail&source=g
> >        5. tel:[19](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
> >        6. mailto:[20]wes.benedict at lp.org
> >        7. [21]http://facebook.com/libertarians
> >        8. [22]http://lp.org/membership
> >        9. mailto:[23]wes.benedict at lp.org
> >       10. [24]https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
> >       11. tel:[25](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
> >       12. mailto:[26]wes.benedict at lp.org
> >       13. [27]http://facebook.com/libertarians
> >       14. [28]http://lp.org/membership
> >
> >   --
> >   --
> >   In Liberty,
> >   Caryn Ann Harlos
> >   Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
> >   Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
> >   - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
> >   Communications Director, [30]Libertarian Party of Colorado
> >   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
> >   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
> >   We defend your rights
> >   And oppose the use of force
> >   Taxation is theft
> >
> > References
> >
> >   1. mailto:planning4liberty at gmail.com
> >   2. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
> >   3. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >   4. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >   5. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
> >   6. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >   7. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> >   8. http://lp.org/membership
> >   9. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >  10. https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
> >  11. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
> >  12. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >  13. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> >  14. http://lp.org/membership
> >  15. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
> >  16. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
> >  17. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >  18. https://maps.google.com/?q=y+with+whichever+direction+the+
> LNC+&entry=gmail&source=g
> >  19. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
> >  20. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >  21. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> >  22. http://lp.org/membership
> >  23. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >  24. https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
> >  25. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
> >  26. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
> >  27. http://facebook.com/libertarians
> >  28. http://lp.org/membership
> >  29. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
> >  30. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>
>


-- 
-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
   I'm for fundraising by having a dunk tank with Daniel Hayes.  We would
   raise a ton.

   On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:04 PM, Daniel Hayes <[1]daniel.hayes at lp.org>
   wrote:

     I’m for deleting the whole platform and rolling the omissions plank
     into the end of the SOP. But that’s a little out of the power of the
     LNC.
     Daniel Hayes
     LNC At Large Member
     Sent from my iPhone
     > On Mar 27, 2018, at 9:55 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
     <[2]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
     >
     >   This  is how we have done it successfully.  And the disclaimer
     can be
     >   done very politely and professionally that will not embarrass
     the
     >   candidate.  I would hope that candidates would make that
     disclaimer
     >   themselves.  Just as an activist I always clearly say when I
     deviate
     >   from an LP position or when it is unsettled (most notable
     example being
     >   abortion).
     >
     >   On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Joshua Katz
     >   <[1][3]planning4liberty at gmail.com> wrote:
     >
     >        Well, I'm clearly outnumbered, and it's
     situation-dependent, but
     >     as a
     >        general matter, I think I'd rather not do it than use a
     >     disclaimer (but
     >        I favor running things without the disclaimer, and if we
     can't do
     >     that,
     >        then just not running it - and, given our current system,
     I'm
     >     happy
     >        leaving that decision to the APRC and staff).  There are
     probably
     >        circumstances where I'm fine with the disclaimer, and
     >     circumstances
     >        where I'm less fine.
     >        Joshua A. Katz
     >        On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:08 PM,
     <[1][2][4]erin.adams at lp.org> wrote:
     >          I am comfortable with this
     >        On 2018-03-27 18:55, Elizabeth Van Horn wrote:
     >          I favor this method. As it allows for highlighting a
     candidate,
     >          while
     >          simultaneously alerting readers that the LP platform
     differs
     >          somewhat.
     >          ---
     >          Elizabeth Van Horn
     >          LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
     >          Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
     >          Chair-LP Social Media Process Review Committee
     >          Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
     >          [2][3][5]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >          On 2018-03-27 15:14, Whitney Bilyeu wrote:
     >          What if we just ask staff to include in the blog post a
     >     disclaimer
     >          of
     >             sorts with any such link....acknowledging that there
     may be
     >          specific
     >             opinions held by the candidate that are not 100% our
     own...?
     >             Whitney
     >             On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Wes Benedict
     >          <[1][3][4][6]wes.benedict at lp.org>

   >
   >           wrote:
   >             Dear LNC:
   >             I'm bringing this to your attention now, because it has
   not
   >        been an
   >             issue for several months, but likely will come up again
   soon
   >        given
   >             that we have lots of candidates and will be writing lots
   of
   >        blog
   >             entries about candidates this year.
   >             Staff works to publish articles that comply with the LNC
   >   Bylaws
   >        and
   >             Policy Manual. The Advertising Publications and Review
   >        Committee is
   >             tasked with ensuring publications comply.
   >             I'd like to point out that I think Staff and the APRC
   have
   >   had
   >        a
   >             pretty good working relationship for at least 3 years and
   >        perhaps
   >             even longer than that if I think about it. So, this is
   not
   >        meant as
   >             a complaint in general about the APRC, Staff, or the
   overall
   >             procedures. Most things are fine in that area, in my
   opinion.
   >   I
   >        just
   >             want to focus on one issue.
   >             Nevertheless, it should come as no surprise that various
   >        members of
   >             the APRC and various staff don't always agree with each
   other
   >        on
   >             what constitutes a violation.
   >             A particular area of uncertainty has been articles with
   >        coverage of
   >             candidates where the articles include some positions that
   >        violate
   >             platform.
   >             I'll use public schools as a hypothetical, and the
   article
   >        below
   >             from the imaginary "Alexandria Beach Times."
   >             ====start article====
   >             [Sentence 1] John Doe, Libertarian candidate for
   Congress,
   >   says
   >        he
   >             wants to cut taxes, cut spending, end the war on drugs,
   and
   >        bring
   >             our troops home from overseas.
   >             [Sentence 2] When asked about public education, John Doe
   says
   >        "I'd
   >             like to use some of the savings from those cuts to
   increase
   >        spending
   >             on public schools."
   >             ====end article====
   >             I think most of the APRC and Staff would feel it's okay
   to
   >        write a
   >             blog and to quote Sentence 1 of the article above. Most
   of
   >   the
   >        APRC
   >             and Staff would probably feel it's NOT okay to quote
   Sentence
   >        2.
   >             The area of likely disagreement is whether or not we
   could
   >        include a
   >             link to the source article in our blog entry.
   >             If there was an article where 50% or more of the content
   >   about
   >        the
   >             Libertarian candidate had platform violations, probably
   most
   >   of
   >        us
   >             wouldn't want to publicize it.
   >             There can be a great article about one of our candidates
   >   where
   >        90%
   >             of the coverage is positive, but if 10% of the article
   >   includes
   >        a
   >             platform violation, we maybe should not link to it, or
   maybe
   >   we
   >             should.
   >             I used public school spending as an example above, but
   all
   >        kinds of
   >             things have come up in the past, such as opposing
   >   legalization
   >        of
   >             hard drugs (or letting the states decide on that), the
   Fair
   >        Tax,
   >             welfare, some regulations, and so on.
   >             I would like direction from the LNC on whether or not it
   is
   >        okay to
   >             publish things like blogs that links with some positions
   that
   >        might
   >             violate the platform.
   >             Based on feedback, I might float a suggest amendment to
   the
   >        Policy
   >             Manual for you all to consider at the upcoming LNC
   meeting.
   >
   >               I can work comfortabl[4]y with whichever direction the
   LNC
   >          might go on
   >               this particular issue, but I think it's an important
   >     enough
   >          issue
   >               that has come up quite a bit in the past, that it
   should
   >     be
   >               considered by the LNC.
   >               If the LNC prefers to leave the decision up to the
   APRC,
   >     that
   >          is
   >               another option I'm comfortable with. In fact, I think
   >     that's
   >          the
   >               status quo right now, however, given recent changes in
   the
   >          APRC, I
   >               could not tell you how they'd rule on the above issue.
   >               Thanks,
   >               --
   >               Wes Benedict, Executive Director
   >               Libertarian National Committee, Inc.
   >               [2]1444 Duke St., Alexandria, VA 22314

     >               [3][5][5][7](202) 333-0008 ext. 232,
     >     [4][6][6][8]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >               [5][7][7][9]facebook.com/libertarians @LPNational
     >               Join the Libertarian Party at:
     >     [6][8][8][10]http://lp.org/membership
     >          References
     >             1. mailto:[9][9][11]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >             2.
     >          [10][10][12]https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St.,+
     Alexandria,+
     >     VA+223
     >          14&entry=gmail&source=g
     >             3. tel:[11][11][13](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
     >             4. mailto:[12][12][14]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >             5. [13][13][15]http://facebook.com/libertarians
     >             6. [14][14][16]http://lp.org/membership
     >     References
     >        1. mailto:[15][17]erin.adams at lp.org
     >        2. [16][18]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >        3. mailto:[17][19]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >        4. [18][20]https://maps.google.com/?
     q=y+with+whichever+direction+the+
     >     LNC+&entry=gmail&source=g
     >        5. tel:[19][21](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
     >        6. mailto:[20][22]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >        7. [21][23]http://facebook.com/libertarians
     >        8. [22][24]http://lp.org/membership
     >        9. mailto:[23][25]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >       10. [24][26]https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
     >       11. tel:[25][27](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
     >       12. mailto:[26][28]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >       13. [27][29]http://facebook.com/libertarians
     >       14. [28][30]http://lp.org/membership
     >
     >   --
     >   --
     >   In Liberty,
     >   Caryn Ann Harlos
     >   Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
     >   Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming,
     Washington)
     >   - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
     >   Communications Director, [30]Libertarian Party of Colorado
     >   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
     >   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
     >   We defend your rights
     >   And oppose the use of force
     >   Taxation is theft
     >
     > References
     >
     >   1. mailto:[31]planning4liberty at gmail.com
     >   2. mailto:[32]erin.adams at lp.org
     >   3. [33]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >   4. mailto:[34]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >   5. tel:[35](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
     >   6. mailto:[36]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >   7. [37]http://facebook.com/libertarians
     >   8. [38]http://lp.org/membership
     >   9. mailto:[39]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >  10. [40]https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
     >  11. tel:[41](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
     >  12. mailto:[42]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >  13. [43]http://facebook.com/libertarians
     >  14. [44]http://lp.org/membership
     >  15. mailto:[45]erin.adams at lp.org
     >  16. [46]http://www.lpcaucus.org/
     >  17. mailto:[47]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >  18. [48]https://maps.google.com/?q=y+
     with+whichever+direction+the+LNC+&entry=gmail&source=g
     >  19. tel:[49](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
     >  20. mailto:[50]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >  21. [51]http://facebook.com/libertarians
     >  22. [52]http://lp.org/membership
     >  23. mailto:[53]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >  24. [54]https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
     >  25. tel:[55](202) 333-0008 ext. 232
     >  26. mailto:[56]wes.benedict at lp.org
     >  27. [57]http://facebook.com/libertarians
     >  28. [58]http://lp.org/membership
     >  29. mailto:[59]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
     >  30. [60]http://www.lpcolorado.org/

   --
   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
   Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
   - [61]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
   Communications Director, [62]Libertarian Party of Colorado
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:daniel.hayes at lp.org
   2. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
   3. mailto:planning4liberty at gmail.com
   4. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
   5. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
   6. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
   7. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
   8. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
   9. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  10. http://lp.org/membership
  11. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  12. https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
  13. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
  14. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  15. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  16. http://lp.org/membership
  17. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
  18. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  19. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  20. https://maps.google.com/?q=y+with+whichever+direction+the+
  21. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
  22. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  23. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  24. http://lp.org/membership
  25. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  26. https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
  27. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
  28. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  29. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  30. http://lp.org/membership
  31. mailto:planning4liberty at gmail.com
  32. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
  33. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  34. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  35. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
  36. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  37. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  38. http://lp.org/membership
  39. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  40. https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
  41. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
  42. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  43. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  44. http://lp.org/membership
  45. mailto:erin.adams at lp.org
  46. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
  47. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  48. https://maps.google.com/?q=y+with+whichever+direction+the+LNC+&entry=gmail&source=g
  49. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
  50. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  51. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  52. http://lp.org/membership
  53. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  54. https://maps.google.com/?q=1444+Duke+St
  55. tel:(202) 333-0008 ext. 232
  56. mailto:wes.benedict at lp.org
  57. http://facebook.com/libertarians
  58. http://lp.org/membership
  59. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  60. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
  61. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
  62. http://www.lpcolorado.org/


More information about the Lnc-business mailing list