[Lnc-business] Motion - Seeking Cosponsors
Caryn Ann Harlos
caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
Sat Jun 2 16:54:35 EDT 2018
I’m not at all pleased with limiting participation and will co-sponsor any
motion that eases or eliminates that. I prefer complete elimination.
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:30 PM Starchild via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
> Would it be any more of a logistical and planning nightmare than
> administering, collecting, and validating candidates' tokens? I suspect
> not. The time between debate rounds while votes are being counted could
> be used for open discussion/debate about the candidates among members
> of the debate audience. Our election process usually does not allow for
> that kind of immediate, open feedback during the process, and I think
> it could be helpful.
>
> Love & Liberty,
> ((( starchild )))
> At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
> [1]RealReform at earthlink.net
> (415) 625-FREE
> @StarchildSF
>
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Justin O'Donnell wrote:
>
> Starchild,
> I like the idea in theory, but I hate the logistical and planning
> nightmare that it would impose upon convention staff. Conducting and
> validating the results of a straw poll between each round would either
> limit the time for each round of debate, or require the CoC to readjuat
> the schedule and eliminate other planned events and speakers to allot
> more time for the debates.
> Justin O'Donnell
> LNC Region 8 Representative
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
>
--
--
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
I’m not at all pleased with limiting participation and will co-sponsor
any motion that eases or eliminates that. I prefer complete
elimination.
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:30 PM Starchild via Lnc-business
<[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
Would it be any more of a logistical and planning nightmare than
administering, collecting, and validating candidates' tokens? I
suspect
not. The time between debate rounds while votes are being counted
could
be used for open discussion/debate about the candidates among
members
of the debate audience. Our election process usually does not
allow for
that kind of immediate, open feedback during the process, and I
think
it could be helpful.
Love & Liberty,
((( starchild )))
At-Large Representative, Libertarian National Committee
[1][2]RealReform at earthlink.net
(415) 625-FREE
@StarchildSF
On Jun 2, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Justin O'Donnell wrote:
Starchild,
I like the idea in theory, but I hate the logistical and planning
nightmare that it would impose upon convention staff. Conducting
and
validating the results of a straw poll between each round would
either
limit the time for each round of debate, or require the CoC to
readjuat
the schedule and eliminate other planned events and speakers to
allot
more time for the debates.
Justin O'Donnell
LNC Region 8 Representative
References
1. mailto:[3]RealReform at earthlink.net
--
--
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann Harlos
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
- [4]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
Communications Director, [5]Libertarian Party of Colorado
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
We defend your rights
And oppose the use of force
Taxation is theft
References
1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
2. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
3. mailto:RealReform at earthlink.net
4. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
5. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list