[Lnc-business] Judicial committee

[Caryn Ann Harlos]

I deny the body legitimately voted to suspend the rules for at-large.  They
were led to that decision.

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business <
lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

> The vote to suspend the rules was specific to the At-Large, as there was a
> question from the floor asking if the rules suspension would also be for
> the judicial committee.  Nick ruled that it would only be for the At-Large.
>
> So, while the delegate body did vote to suspend the rules for the
> At-Large, and let the top five candidates be the winners, that rule
> suspension doesn't apply to the judicial committee.  (Per Nick's decision
> at the convention.)
>
> It's really just the judicial committee that's in limbo.
>
> The previous judicial committee is disbanded when the convention ends.
> The LNC doesn't have the authority to appoint a new judicial committee, as
> the bylaws say only the judicial committee can't appoint members, but there
> is no judicial committee.
>
>
> ---
> Elizabeth Van Horn
> LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
> Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
> LP Social Media Process Review Committee
> Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
> http://www.lpcaucus.org/
>
>
>
>
> On 2018-07-05 18:30, Whitney Bilyeu via Lnc-business wrote:
>
>> Didn't the delegates vote to allow this process?
>>    Whitney Bilyeu
>>
>>    On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 5:22 PM Whitney Bilyeu <[1]whitneycb76 at gmail.com>
>>    wrote:
>>
>>    On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 5:04 PM Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business
>>    <[2]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>
>>         Since we apparently closed the convention without a procedure for
>>         populating the JC, is anyone in the mood for a motion to appoint
>>      the
>>         top seven vote winners as the JC for this term?  I suppose we can
>>      be
>>         anarchists and live without a JC this term or solicit
>>      applications from
>>         people who were not nominated at convention.
>>         I don't have the top seven names handy, we would have to verify
>>      they
>>         have been members for four years.
>>         --
>>         Sam Goldstein
>>         Libertarian National Committee
>>         317-850-0726 Cell
>>
>> References
>>
>>    1. mailto:whitneycb76 at gmail.com
>>    2. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>>
>


-- 
-- 
*In Liberty,*
*Caryn Ann Harlos*
Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington) - Caryn.Ann.
Harlos at LP.org <Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org>
Communications Director, Libertarian Party of Colorado
<http://www.lpcolorado.org/>
Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee

A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
*We defend your rights*
*And oppose the use of force*
*Taxation is theft*
-------------- next part --------------
   I deny the body legitimately voted to suspend the rules for at-large.
   They were led to that decision.

   On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Elizabeth Van Horn via Lnc-business
   <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:

     The vote to suspend the rules was specific to the At-Large, as there
     was a question from the floor asking if the rules suspension would
     also be for the judicial committee.  Nick ruled that it would only
     be for the At-Large.
     So, while the delegate body did vote to suspend the rules for the
     At-Large, and let the top five candidates be the winners, that rule
     suspension doesn't apply to the judicial committee.  (Per Nick's
     decision at the convention.)
     It's really just the judicial committee that's in limbo.
     The previous judicial committee is disbanded when the convention
     ends.  The LNC doesn't have the authority to appoint a new judicial
     committee, as the bylaws say only the judicial committee can't
     appoint members, but there is no judicial committee.
     ---
     Elizabeth Van Horn
     LNC Region 3 (IN, MI, OH, KY)
     Secretary Libertarian Party of Madison Co, Indiana
     LP Social Media Process Review Committee
     Vice-Chair Libertarian Pragmatist Caucus
     [2]http://www.lpcaucus.org/

   On 2018-07-05 18:30, Whitney Bilyeu via Lnc-business wrote:

     Didn't the delegates vote to allow this process?
        Whitney Bilyeu
        On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 5:22 PM Whitney Bilyeu
     <[1][3]whitneycb76 at gmail.com>
        wrote:
        On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 5:04 PM Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business
        <[2][4]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
             Since we apparently closed the convention without a
     procedure for
             populating the JC, is anyone in the mood for a motion to
     appoint
          the
             top seven vote winners as the JC for this term?  I suppose
     we can
          be
             anarchists and live without a JC this term or solicit
          applications from
             people who were not nominated at convention.
             I don't have the top seven names handy, we would have to
     verify
          they
             have been members for four years.
             --
             Sam Goldstein
             Libertarian National Committee
             317-850-0726 Cell
     References
        1. mailto:[5]whitneycb76 at gmail.com
        2. mailto:[6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org

   --
   --
   In Liberty,
   Caryn Ann Harlos
   Region 1 Representative, Libertarian National Committee (Alaska,
   Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Washington)
   - [7]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
   Communications Director, [8]Libertarian Party of Colorado
   Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee
   A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
   We defend your rights
   And oppose the use of force
   Taxation is theft

References

   1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   2. http://www.lpcaucus.org/
   3. mailto:whitneycb76 at gmail.com
   4. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   5. mailto:whitneycb76 at gmail.com
   6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
   7. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
   8. http://www.lpcolorado.org/