[Lnc-business] Email Ballot 2018-11: ACKNOWLEDGE ELECTION OF JC
erin.adams at lp.org
erin.adams at lp.org
Wed Jul 11 10:24:40 EDT 2018
With all due respect Sam, that simply isnt true. It is not true that "
There is nothing we can do about it
at this point except live with it the best we can for two years." and
honestly, Im sickened by the tactics Im seeing here from some in an
attempt to FURTHER silence others. Its vile at best. Buckle up folks, if
this is the tone that sets the way for THIS lnc,Many of you will hate me
the end of this term. Alternate or not I WILL NOT be dismissed and
silenced.
On 2018-07-09 20:09, Sam Goldstein via Lnc-business wrote:
> Caryn Ann,
>
> We all acknowledge that the LNC At Large and JC elections went awry.
> There is nothing we can do about it
> at this point except live with it the best we can for two years. We
> will have a fix in place before the
> convention convenes at Austin that can be passed by the delegates and
> made effective immediately.
>
> At the very least, take the discussion off the email ballot thread
> which is supposed to just be for recording
> votes on the motion.
>
> ---
> Sam Goldstein
> Libertarian National Committee
> 317-850-0726 Cell
>
> On 2018-07-09 20:55, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>> Oh my goodness. I am sorry but this is beyond belief.
>> I think our elections were handled wrongfully and I am supposed to
>> NOT
>> yell it from the rooftops? What Party am I in again?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:52 PM, John Phillips via Lnc-business
>> <[1]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>>
>> Agreed, to a point. At some time, preaching to the choir becomes
>> counter productive. As noted earlier, we are all aware that it
>> sucked, and is a bad situation with no easy fix that will make
>> everyone happy immediately. We all want to fix it, and fix it
>> yesterday. I even agree with all of Caryn Ann's points, and
>> yours.
>> Bring it up once a week. Absolutely. Don't bring it up 5 times
>> a
>> day. Stopping multiple times to read the same arguments takes
>> away
>> time from working on fixing it, and promoting the party in other
>> ways. I love the passion, I really do, but beating us up
>> continually
>> on a point we 90% or more agree on IS counterproductive. Let's
>> move
>> on and FIX IT.
>> Don't shut up, but let's be productive, let's not let this crap
>> happen again.
>> John Phillips
>> Libertarian National Committee Region 6 Representative
>> Cell 217-412-5973
>>
>> On 7/9/2018 7:39 PM, Craig Bowden via Lnc-business wrote:
>>
>> Looking out for the membership and delegates is nothing to be
>> quiet
>> about. I personally hope it is brought up at least once a week
>> until
>> solutions are in place to prevent it from ever happening again.
>> Respectfully,
>> Craig Bowden
>> Region 1 Alternate
>> On 2018-07-09 18:33, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>>
>> I respectfully decline.
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Sam Goldstein
>> <[1][2]sam.goldstein at lp.org>
>> wrote:
>> Caryn Ann,
>> Just shut up about this already!
>> Respectfully,
>> ---
>> Sam Goldstein
>> Libertarian National Committee
>> 317-850-0726 Cell
>> On 2018-07-09 18:34, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business wrote:
>> PS: Before this vote ends, I am going to put something
>> together
>> to try
>> to convince you that this is actually one of the worst ways
>> to
>> solve.
>> My first issue - that of steering the delegates down that
>> road
>> with
>> at-large is unsolvable- at least unsolvable in any way that
>> we
>> would
>> ever do. If it were up to me, I would punt it all back to
>> the
>> delegates.
>> The second issue - of how to handle this situation with the
>> JC
>> -
>> well
>> we are trying to solve it now and I think we are solving it
>> wrong
>> both
>> ethically and procedurally.
>> And a remaining issue - is one where me and RONR come into
>> conflict.
>> Rules are tools. Just because a rule allows something
>> doesn't
>> mean
>> it
>> is right, and this is probably why the first issue is
>> sticking
>> in my
>> craw so badly. It is fundamentally NOT RIGHT to change the
>> rules of
>> an
>> election mid-way. There is a huge difference between
>> majority
>> and
>> plurality and our candidates deserve to know as it effects
>> the
>> way
>> they
>> campaign. We treated them and their efforts as pawns, and
>> it
>> isn't
>> right.
>> I know some of you are thinking, just shut up about this
>> already.
>> Well, I am a hard-nose on some things, and this is one of
>> them.
>> Just
>> like it was with the eternal secrecy clause last term.
>> The only way we are going to learn as an organization is if
>> this is
>> a
>> bit painful. And in so doing we will model over-the-top
>> integrity
>> to
>> our members rather than political expediency.
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos
>> <[1][2][3]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org> wrote:
>> ==I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get the
>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that hundreds
>> of
>> delegates
>> didn't even vote in the two races because we put them off
>> so
>> long.
>> In
>> the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast votes in the
>> At-Large
>> and
>> JC races. Them's the rules - elections are won by those who
>> stay and
>> vote - but oh my did we make it hard. The combination of
>> voting
>> methodology, tabulation method, and scheduling left us in a
>> bad
>> place.===
>> You mean we ran in front of a racing car and now are
>> surprised
>> we
>> got
>> ran over?
>> But it is more than that. The delegates were led to make a
>> decision
>> in
>> a certain direction. There WERE other options. Whether or
>> not one
>> agrees with the voting methodology, it is the methodology
>> and
>> its
>> intent was to use approval voting to show approval and we
>> turned it
>> on
>> its head. Why weren't the delegates given other options?
>> ==All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>> complain.
>> As far
>> as
>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
>> reasonable.
>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all Party
>> members or
>> us
>> filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in motion -
>> are
>> even
>> more
>> violative of the Bylaws and Rules.==
>> Are they all? I don't think so. And I do think my very
>> real
>> complaint
>> of how the delegates were steered in a certain direction is
>> being
>> ignored at best (or maligned at worst).
>> ==The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
>> legality:
>> the
>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
>> candidates
>> and
>> the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's also no
>> doubt in
>> my
>> mind that had they been asked they would have done the same
>> for the
>> JC.
>> A room of several hundred Libertarians were not coerced
>> into
>> doing
>> that
>> - they went with what Nick suggested because that's what
>> they
>> wanted
>> to
>> do. He just told them how.===
>> And that is where the dispute is. Most of the people there
>> trusted
>> us
>> (I use us as Nick was acting as the spokesperson of the LNC
>> and this
>> isn't about Nick ultimately) not to tell them what they
>> wanted.
>> They
>> were presented with two choices in which they were led down
>> a
>> particular path. You are an attorney Joe, you know exactly
>> what I
>> am
>> getting at here.
>> Do you really think that if they were offered a majority
>> rising vote
>> on
>> the spot to choose between options they would not have
>> taken
>> that?
>> It
>> never ocurred to most of them that there WERE any other
>> options. It
>> didn't immediately occur to me and I am well-versed in this
>> stuff.
>> It
>> stinks. If a government acted this way we would be all
>> lathered up.
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Joe Bishop-Henchman
>> <[2][3][4]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org> wrote:
>> I get the anger. I'm angry. When we ultimately do get the
>> state-by-state tallies, I'm sure we'll find that hundreds
>> of
>> delegates didn't even vote in the two races because we
>> put
>> them
>> off
>> so long. In the 2016 convention, whole states didn't cast
>> votes in
>> the At-Large and JC races. Them's the rules - elections
>> are
>> won by
>> those who stay and vote - but oh my did we make it hard.
>> The
>> combination of voting methodology, tabulation method, and
>> scheduling
>> left us in a bad place.
>> All that said, I don't want to just be angry and
>> complain.
>> As far
>> as
>> actions that can be taken, this resolution is the most
>> reasonable.
>> Other possibilities - revotes or mail votes of all Party
>> members
>> or
>> us filling the JC seats or setting multiple JCs in motion
>> -
>> are
>> even
>> more violative of the Bylaws and Rules.
>> I do not dispute that one can reasonably argue that every
>> JC
>> candidate was disapproved and that it should sit empty
>> until
>> 2022.
>> The contrary view admittedly rests on a thread of
>> legality:
>> the
>> delegates expressed their wish to take the top at-large
>> candidates
>> and the Bylaws say the same applies for the JC. There's
>> also
>> no
>> doubt in my mind that had they been asked they would have
>> done the
>> same for the JC. A room of several hundred Libertarians
>> were
>> not
>> coerced into doing that - they went with what Nick
>> suggested
>> because
>> that's what they wanted to do. He just told them how.
>> They
>> didn't
>> want the LNC fighting over who would fill the seats if
>> they
>> were
>> left vacant.
>> I doubt I'm going to convince you but I did want to write
>> this to
>> emphasize that at least I am not sanguine or sweeping
>> anything
>> blithely under the rug. I expect rethinking how we do
>> elections
>> will
>> be a big priority for many of us.
>> JBH
>> On 2018-07-09 16:46, Caryn Ann Harlos via Lnc-business
>> wrote:
>> Suspension of the rules has to be specific and there is
>> no
>> way
>> around
>> the fact that we used the number 5 over and over.
>> This is taking things to an even deeper level of
>> improper. I
>> object to
>> the whole at-Large process- I don’t think the
>> delegates
>> made an
>> independent choice and now to just infer this upon
>> that
>> is two
>> bridges
>> too far.
>> This is a big screwup and I won’t be part of sweeping
>> it
>> under
>> the rug.
>> It alarms me to no end how blithely the whole
>> situation
>> is
>> being
>> taken.
>> There are people looking at us and seeing nothing
>> different
>> than
>> the
>> government we wish to reform.
>> There was a controversial election and at least one
>> state
>> chair
>> and
>> candidate has been asking for the state by state
>> rallies
>> with
>> no
>> time
>> frame given him.
>> The whole thing was an affront to people expecting an
>> entirely
>> different thing when they ran. I will not be sanguine
>> about
>> it.
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM Whitney Bilyeu
>> <[1][3][4][5]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org> wrote:
>> This point did come up immediately after
>> adjournment,
>> while
>> Nick
>> was
>> still at the mic. I don't recall who brought it up,
>> but
>> the
>> statement
>> was made that it would follow the same procedure as
>> At-Large
>> at
>> that
>> point, since we were no longer in session.
>> No one raised the question prior to that.
>> Whitney Bilyeu
>> Region 7 Representative
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>> Lnc-business
>> <[2][4][5][6]lnc-business at hq.lp.org> wrote:
>> Joshua they were not given a choice on this.
>> The
>> JC
>> never
>> came
>> up.
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM
>> <[1][3][5][6][7]joshua.smith at lp.org>
>> wrote:
>> I vote yes. Given that the delegates were given
>> the
>> choice
>> at
>> convention
>> just a few short days ago, I believe we should
>> respect
>> that
>> decision.
>> Thanks,
>> Joshua D. Smith
>> On 2018-07-07 22:23, Caryn Ann Harlos via
>> Lnc-business
>> wrote:
>> > We have an electronic mail ballot. Votes are
>> due
>> to the
>> LNC-Business
>> > list by July 14, 2018 at 11:59:59pm Pacific
>> time.
>> Co-Sponsors:
>> > Bishop-Henchman, Goldstein, Hagan, Merced,
>> Van
>> Horn
>> Motion:
>> Move
>> > that
>> > the Libertarian National Committee
>> acknowledge
>> the
>> election of
>> the
>> > following to the Judicial Committee for a
>> four-year
>> term:
>> D.
>> Frank
>> > Robinson, Chuck Moulton, Darryl Perry, Ruth
>> Bennett,
>> Geoff
>> Neale,
>> > Jim
>> > Turney, and Tricia Sprankle. You can keep
>> track
>> of
>> the
>> Secretary's
>> > manual tally of votes here:
>> [1][2][4][6][7][8]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> > --
>> > --
>> > In Liberty,
>> > Caryn Ann Harlos
>> > Region 1 Representative, Libertarian
>> National
>> Committee
>> (Alaska,
>> > Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas,
>> Montana,
>> Utah,
>> Wyoming,
>> > Washington)
>> > - [2]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org
>> > Communications Director, [3]Libertarian
>> Party of
>> Colorado
>> > Chair, LP Historical Preservation
>> Committee
>> > A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> > We defend your rights
>> > And oppose the use of force
>> > Taxation is theft
>> >
>> > References
>> >
>> > 1. [3][5][7][8][9]https://tinyurl.co
>> m/lncvoting
>> > 2. mailto:[4]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> > 3. [5][6][8][9][10]http://www.lpcolor
>> ado.org/
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National
>> Committee
>> Secretary
>> - [6]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or
>> Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>> LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>> References
>> 1. mailto:[7][9][10][11]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 2. [8][10][11][12]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 3. [9][11][12][13]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 4. mailto:[10]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 5. [11][12][13][14]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 6. mailto:[12]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>> Secretary
>> - [13]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>> LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>> References
>> 1. mailto:[13][14][15]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 2. mailto:[14][15][16]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 3. mailto:[15][16][17]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 4. [16][17][18]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 5. [17][18][19]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 6. [18][19][20]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 7. mailto:[19][20][21]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 8. [20][21][22]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 9. [21][22][23]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 10. mailto:[22]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 11. [23][23][24]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 12. mailto:[24]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 13. mailto:[25]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> --
>> JBH
>> ------------
>> Joe Bishop-Henchman
>> LNC Member (At-Large)
>> [26][24][25]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> [27][25][26]www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>> Secretary
>> - [28]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>> LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee
>> Secretary
>> - [29]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee -
>> LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>> References
>> 1. mailto:[26][27]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 2. mailto:[27][28]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 3. mailto:[28][29]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 4. mailto:[29][30]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 5. mailto:[30][31]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 6. [31][32]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 7. [32][33]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 8. [33][34]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 9. mailto:[34][35]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 10. [35][36]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 11. [36][37]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 12. [37][38]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 13. mailto:[38][39]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 14. mailto:[39][40]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 15. mailto:[40][41]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 16. [41][42]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 17. [42][43]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 18. [43][44]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 19. mailto:[44][45]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 20. [45][46]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 21. [46][47]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 22. mailto:[47]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 23. [48][48]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 24. mailto:[49]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 25. mailto:[50]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 26. mailto:[51][49]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 27. [52][50]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> 28. mailto:[53]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 29. mailto:[54]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>> - [55]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>> References
>> 1. mailto:[51]sam.goldstein at lp.org
>> 2. mailto:[52]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 3. mailto:[53]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 4. mailto:[54]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 5. mailto:[55]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 6. mailto:[56]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 7. [57]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 8. [58]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 9. [59]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 10. mailto:[60]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 11. [61]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 12. [62]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 13. [63]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 14. mailto:[64]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 15. mailto:[65]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 16. mailto:[66]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 17. [67]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 18. [68]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 19. [69]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 20. mailto:[70]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 21. [71]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 22. [72]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 23. [73]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 24. mailto:[74]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 25. [75]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> 26. mailto:[76]caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 27. mailto:[77]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 28. mailto:[78]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 29. mailto:[79]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 30. mailto:[80]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 31. [81]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 32. [82]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 33. [83]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 34. mailto:[84]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 35. [85]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 36. [86]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 37. [87]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 38. mailto:[88]whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 39. mailto:[89]lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 40. mailto:[90]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 41. [91]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 42. [92]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 43. [93]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 44. mailto:[94]joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 45. [95]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 46. [96]https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 47. mailto:[97]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 48. [98]http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 49. mailto:[99]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 50. mailto:[100]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 51. mailto:[101]joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 52. [102]http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> 53. mailto:[103]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 54. mailto:[104]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 55. mailto:[105]Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>>
>> --
>> --
>> In Liberty,
>> Caryn Ann Harlos
>> Libertarian Party and Libertarian National Committee Secretary
>> - [106]Caryn.Ann. Harlos at LP.org or Secretary at LP.org.
>> Chair, LP Historical Preservation Committee - LPedia at LP.org
>> A haiku to the Statement of Principles:
>> We defend your rights
>> And oppose the use of force
>> Taxation is theft
>>
>> References
>>
>> 1. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 2. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>> 3. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 4. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 5. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 6. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 7. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 8. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 9. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 10. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 11. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 12. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 13. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 14. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 15. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 16. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 17. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 18. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 19. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 20. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 21. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 22. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 23. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 24. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 25. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 26. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> 27. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 28. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 29. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 30. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 31. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 32. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 33. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 34. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 35. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 36. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 37. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 38. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 39. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 40. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 41. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 42. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 43. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 44. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 45. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 46. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 47. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 48. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 49. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 50. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> 51. mailto:sam.goldstein at lp.org
>> 52. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 53. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 54. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 55. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 56. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 57. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 58. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 59. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 60. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 61. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 62. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 63. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 64. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 65. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 66. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 67. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 68. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 69. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 70. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 71. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 72. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 73. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 74. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 75. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> 76. mailto:caryn.ann.harlos at lp.org
>> 77. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 78. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 79. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 80. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 81. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 82. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 83. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 84. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 85. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 86. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 87. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 88. mailto:whitney.bilyeu at lp.org
>> 89. mailto:lnc-business at hq.lp.org
>> 90. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 91. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 92. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 93. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 94. mailto:joshua.smith at lp.org
>> 95. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 96. https://tinyurl.com/lncvoting
>> 97. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 98. http://www.lpcolorado.org/
>> 99. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 100. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 101. mailto:joe.bishop-henchman at lp.org
>> 102. http://www.facebook.com/groups/189510455174837
>> 103. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 104. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 105. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
>> 106. mailto:Caryn.Ann.Harlos at LP.org
More information about the Lnc-business
mailing list